What this article isn't: proof or new data about "vaccine",it is hypothesis having very good data from VAERS.

What this article is: like u/M-I-vet says:

study is the injection smoking gun. It shows the mechanisms that cause all the adverse effects (a small fraction of which are documented in VAERS).

Ok,they can say:

• muh, Greg Nigh isn't "real scientist",and claim something about the rest. This is however unimportant Who points thing,but WHAT is pointed.

• muh that is only "hypothesis" - sorry,but in public health thing shall be proven to be safe,not proven not being unsafe.

Thing is: with such smoking gun indeed injections shall be stopped until it is proven that those Hypothesis (and VAERS data) is somehow wrong. It may be powerful Hypothesis "only" and it is enough - we not really need 100% proof but it is 100% scientific and solid based on solid science without any claims other than related to solid and mainstream science - ignoring it all is already crime and vaxxers admission of guilt

What this article isn't: proof or new data about "vaccine",it is hypothesis having very good data from VAERS.

What this article is: like u/M-I-vet says:

study is the injection smoking gun. It shows the mechanisms that cause all the adverse effects (a small fraction of which are documented in VAERS).

Ok,they can say:

• muh, Greg Nigh isn't "real scientist",and claim something about the rest. This is however unimportant Who points thing,but WHAT is pointed.

• muh that is only "hypothesis" - sorry,but in public health thing shall be proven to be safe,not proven not being unsafe.

Thing is: with such smoking gun indeed injections shall be stopped until it is proven that those Hypothesis (and VAERS data) is somehow wrong. It may be powerful Hypothesis,we not need 100% proof,and ignoring it all is already crime and vaxxers admission of guilt

What this article isn't: proof or new data about "vaccine",it is hypothesis having very good data from VAERS.

What this article is: like u/M-I-vet says:

study is the injection smoking gun. It shows the mechanisms that cause all the adverse effects (a small fraction of which are documented in VAERS).

Ok,they can say:

• muh, Greg Nigh isn't "real scientist",and claim something about the rest. This is however unimportant Who points thing,but WHAT is pointed.

• muh that is only "hypothesis" - **sorry,but in public health thing shall be proven to be safe,not proven not being unsafe. **

So with such smoking gun indeed injections shall be stopped until it is proven that those Hypothesis (and VAERS data) is somehow wrong.