(Sorry for the SLOPPY voice to text, but I think you’ll get the gist of what I’m saying and I don’t have time to edit the entirety right now. Sorry)

I don’t know, just feels suspicious to me. Is this just a plan to get us to accept the 148 per million number? That’s incredibly high, can’t be overstated, but Normies don’t know that. They think that sounds low. The way we describe it, people are dropping dead right and left, millions of people are dying. That’s what they think we are saying. 148 cases per million, not necessarily deaths, if you vaccinated the entire US population 51,000 people would be hit with events. Maybe not even die. We know it’s higher than that, right?

Now, granted we’re talking about a specific age group of men with that 148 cases per million, and it’s very rough math on the back of a napkin to carry that out to all demographics but I don’t have the numbers on me.

Either way, even if it’s ballpark, that number seem awfully low, doesn’t it? Are they trying to get us to take it? Is this bait?

Remember, they tried to do this with Covid mortality rates. Remember? They started pretending that they were “hiding” that the mortality rate was as “low” as 1.03%. You guys remember that? I do.

I think that might’ve been the same format, a situation where a document mysteriously vanished from the CDC website. I’m just going from memory here, I’m sure some of you might also recall this.

But it was right around the time when we were making headway in convincing people that the mortality rate exaggerated. Then, all of a sudden, here we go with this mysterious document and we had to hear about how 1.03%, or whatever the number was, “is actually quite high!“ Which it would be. It would be very high. We got suckered on that one I think.

Here I go offending people again, but let’s be honest, many of the people who hang out in the places we hang out really don’t understand viruses, pathology, virology or epidemiology. I mean they fall for fake videos with regularity and many of us just really aren’t that smart. So we run with it, like fake videos of ballots being destroyed, claims from grifters that are preposterous on the face of it but we want to believe it so we keep passing it around on social media, we fall for this shit a lot. I don’t know if this is another one of those baited traps.

Because while these numbers of events are very very high, you know damn well most Normies would think that’s a perfectly acceptable number to protect us from the worst virus we’ve ever ever seen ever in our entire history of mankind!!!

And would be much lower than what I had expected. I’ll be just based on what I see, around here especially, I would think this number would be much much higher.

Suspicious.

(Sorry for the SLOPPY voice to text, but I think you’ll get the gist of what I’m saying and I don’t have to edit the entirety right now. Sorry)

I don’t know, just feels suspicious to me. Is this just a plan to get us to accept the 148 per million number? That’s incredibly high, can’t be overstated, but Normies don’t know that. They think that sounds low. The way we describe it, people are dropping dead right and left, millions of people are dying. That’s what they think we are saying. 148 cases per million, not necessarily deaths, if you vaccinated the entire US population 51,000 people would be hit with events. Maybe not even die. We know it’s higher than that, right?

Now, granted we’re talking about a specific age group of men with that 148 cases per million, and it’s very rough math on the back of a napkin to carry that out to all demographics but I don’t have the numbers on me.

Either way, even if it’s ballpark, that number seem awfully low, doesn’t it? Are they trying to get us to take it? Is this bait?

Remember, they tried to do this with Covid mortality rates. Remember? They started pretending that they were “hiding” that the mortality rate was as “low” as 1.03%. You guys remember that? I do.

I think that might’ve been the same format, a situation where a document mysteriously vanished from the CDC website. I’m just going from memory here, I’m sure some of you might also recall this.

But it was right around the time when we were making headway in convincing people that the mortality rate exaggerated. Then, all of a sudden, here we go with this mysterious document and we had to hear about how 1.03%, or whatever the number was, “is actually quite high!“ Which it would be. It would be very high. We got suckered on that one I think.

Here I go offending people again, but let’s be honest, many of the people who hang out in the places we hang out really don’t understand viruses, pathology, virology or epidemiology. I mean they fall for fake videos with regularity and many of us just really aren’t that smart. So we run with it, like fake videos of ballots being destroyed, claims from grifters that are preposterous on the face of it but we want to believe it so we keep passing it around on social media, we fall for this shit a lot. I don’t know if this is another one of those baited traps.

Because while these numbers of events are very very high, you know damn well most Normies would think that’s a perfectly acceptable number to protect us from the worst virus we’ve ever ever seen ever in our entire history of mankind!!!

And would be much lower than what I had expected. I’ll be just based on what I see, around here especially, I would think this number would be much much higher.

Suspicious.

(Sorry for the SLOPPY voice to text, but I think you’ll get the gist of what I’m saying and I don’t have time did it right now. Sorry)

I don’t know, just feels suspicious to me. Is this just a plan to get us to accept the 148 per million number? That’s incredibly high, can’t be overstated, but Normies don’t know that. They think that sounds low. The way we describe it, people are dropping dead right and left, millions of people are dying. That’s what they think we are saying. 148 cases per million, not necessarily deaths, if you vaccinated the entire US population 51,000 people would be hit events. Maybe not even die. We know it’s higher than that, right?

No, granted we’re talking about a specific age group of men with that 148 cases per million, and it’s very rough math on the back of a napkin to carry that out to all demographics but I don’t have the numbers on me.

Either way, even if it’s ballpark, that number’s he is off a low, doesn’t it? Are they trying to get us to take it? Is this bait?

Remember, they tried to do this with Covid mortality rates. Remember? They started pretending that they were “hiding” that the mortality rate was as “low” as 1.03%. You guys remember that? I do.

I think that might’ve been the same format, a situation where a document mysteriously vanished from the CDC website. I’m just going from memory here, I’m sure some of you might also recall this.

But it was right around the time when we were making headway in convincing people that the mortality rate exaggerated. Then, all of a sudden, here we go with this mysterious document and we had to hear about how 1.03%, or whatever the number was, “is actually quite high!“ Which it would be. It would be very high. We got suckered on that one I think.

Here I go offending people again, but let’s be honest, many of the people who hang out in the places we hang out really don’t understand viruses, pathology, virology or epidemiology. I mean they fall for fake videos consulate, many of us just really aren’t that smart. So we run with it, like fake videos of ballots being destroyed, claims from grifters that are preposterous on the face of it but we want to believe it so we keep passing it around on social media, we fall for this shit a lot. I don’t know if this is another one of those baited traps.

Because while these numbers of events are very very high, you know damn well most Normies would think that’s a perfectly acceptable number to protect us from the worst virus we’ve ever ever seen ever in our entire history of mankind!!!

And would be much lower than what I had expected. I’ll be just based on what I see, around here especially, I would think this number would be much much higher.

Suspicious.

I don’t know, just feels suspicious to me. Is this just a plan to get us to accept the 148 per million number? That’s incredibly high, can’t be overstated, but Normies don’t know that. They think that sounds low. The way we describe it, people are dropping dead right and left, millions of people are dying. That’s what they think we are saying. 148 cases per million, not necessarily deaths, if you vaccinated the entire US population 51,000 people would be hit events. Maybe not even die. We know it’s higher than that, right?

No, granted we’re talking about a specific age group of men with that 148 cases per million, and it’s very rough math on the back of a napkin to carry that out to all demographics but I don’t have the numbers on me.

Either way, even if it’s ballpark, that number’s he is off a low, doesn’t it? Are they trying to get us to take it? Is this bait?

Remember, they tried to do this with Covid mortality rates. Remember? They started pretending that they were “hiding” that the mortality rate was as “low” as 1.03%. You guys remember that? I do.

I think that might’ve been the same format, a situation where a document mysteriously vanished from the CDC website. I’m just going from memory here, I’m sure some of you might also recall this.

But it was right around the time when we were making headway in convincing people that the mortality rate exaggerated. Then, all of a sudden, here we go with this mysterious document and we had to hear about how 1.03%, or whatever the number was, “is actually quite high!“ Which it would be. It would be very high. We got suckered on that one I think.

Here I go offending people again, but let’s be honest, many of the people who hang out in the places we hang out really don’t understand viruses, pathology, virology or epidemiology. I mean they fall for fake videos consulate, many of us just really aren’t that smart. So we run with it, like fake videos of ballots being destroyed, claims from grifters that are preposterous on the face of it but we want to believe it so we keep passing it around on social media, we fall for this shit a lot. I don’t know if this is another one of those baited traps.

Because while these numbers of events are very very high, you know damn well most Normies would think that’s a perfectly acceptable number to protect us from the worst virus we’ve ever ever seen ever in our entire history of mankind!!!

And would be much lower than what I had expected. I’ll be just based on what I see, around here especially, I would think this number would be much much higher.

Suspicious.

I don’t know, just feels suspicious to me. Is this just a plan to get us to accept the 148 per million number? That’s incredibly high, can’t be overstated, but Normies don’t know that. They think that sounds low. The way we describe it, people are dropping dead right and left, millions of people are dying. That’s what they think we are saying. 148 cases per million, not necessarily deaths, if you vaccinated the entire US population 51,000 people would be hit events. Maybe not even die. We know it’s higher than that, right?

No, granted we’re talking about a specific age group of men with that 148 cases per million, and it’s very rough math on the back of a napkin to carry that out to all demographics but I don’t have the numbers on me.

Either way, even if it’s ballpark, that number’s he is off a low, doesn’t it? Are they trying to get us to take it? Is this bait?