Hmmm. I'll confess, not getting it. My point was, tippy top was requested (by an anon) and tippy top was delivered (by Q+), I believe. Not "tip top" tho.

Am I missing something?

Remember: no outside comms. I guess that plausible deniability works here, but again, "tip top" shape itself is so common as to allow for no correlation. But when tippy top was requested, it came though, and that context was confirmation. Exact same phrase, I believe.

That context does not exist here.

I'm just rather wary of some anons reading TOO much into things, instead of applying logical thinking, due diligence, and empirical evidence.

Not saying it ain't. Just saying that I cannot say it is, either.

Hmmm. I'll confess, not getting it. My point was, tippy top was requested (by an anon) and tippy top was delivered (by Q+), I believe. Not "tip top" tho.

Am I missing something?

Remember: no outside comms. I guess that plausible deniability works here, but again, "tip top" shape itself is so common as to allow for no correlation. But when tippy top was requested, it came though, and that context was confirmation. Exact same phrase, I believe.

That context does not exist here.

I'm just rather wary of some anons reading TOO much into things, instead of applying logical thinking, due diligence, and empirical evidence.

Hmmm. I'll confess, not getting it. My point was, tippy top was requested (by an anon) and tippy top was delivered (by Q+), I believe. Not "tip top" tho.

Am I missing something?