Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

things going on over on qagg.news that may or may not be of relevance. over the last 24 hours it appears that more of devin nunes beta testing phase drops were allowed through the qagg.news filter... appreciate anyone who has scanned the truth OTHERS option to review and if you come to the same conclusion.

whether this occurred because truthsocial made them available or the qagg.news board owner had only extracted a sample portion of the nunes beta drops starting on 11 Feb 22 when they added all the new message sources and functions to the aggregate is unknown..

link below is what was there 2 days ago and some speculation about what looked like some kind of initial handshake messaging between nunes and Q at that time (att)...

https://greatawakening.win/p/141rsvahTI/ts-kash-patel-post-rt-q-/

with the new additional nunes drops, later drops of all kinds (Q, scavino, etc) TO one up serial numbers have changed... pushed to higher TO# serial numbers than originally

ok, so what...

there is no knowing why nunes drops were initially incomplete, whether by design or not... setting aside the debate on that and whether the Q now posting on truthsocial is Q or not (despite the cagey denials), suspend disbelief and track this train of thought...

The first "truth" / drop (like this term better) that was a retruth (retweet) / redrop of any earlier message was NunesTO6 / with QTO4 / embedded... (adding two photos to the original graphic)

since it is impossible to redrop / retruth a higher numbered drop i am assuming the the formula is 6 - 4 = 2 and (testing the waters here) this points to 8kun sourced (old) Q drop #2...

Here is the list of TruthSocial Q/Q, Nunes/Q, and Q/Nunes combined drops

TOQ6 - TOQ4 = Q2
TON7 - TOQ4 = Q3
TON76 - TOQ61 = Q15
TOQ85 - TON84 = Q1
TON275 - TOQ15 = Q260

(only surveyed through TO275 att)

and here is a link to those old (8kun) Q drops (retrieval search string was 2,3,15,1,260... however the return is in normal chronological order)

https://qagg.news/?q=%23%232%2C3%2C15%2C1%2C260

that is just one way to test this hypothesis that there is messaging going on between the clients that are showing up on the OTHERS filter for TruthSocial

All kinds of possibilities here... Q resending one of his own messages ( Q / Q drop) could mean to add instead of subtract... or a nunes message with a Q drop embedded could mean add, Q drop with nunes embed could mean subtract --- or vice versa....

will continue to survey till up to date... its a rabbit hole... maybe it leads somewhere many not, however

qagg.news admin is filtering a select group onto the site via Truth/ Others... why them?

if new Q is not old Q, why allow that user in....

why all the very sophisticated upgrades to the site... and update the site the same day that truthsocial went public.... there had to have been considerable coordination, capital and resource outlay to accomplish all the upgrades

there is no money to follow... so its rabbit holes for now...

u/MAGAdeburger u/v8power ... its a rabbit hole guys, and a work in progress,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBjWHBHlvAs

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

things going on over on qagg.news that may or may not be of relevance. over the last 24 hours it appears that more of devin nunes beta testing phase drops were allowed through the qagg.news filter... appreciate anyone who has scanned the truth OTHERS option to review and if you come to the same conclusion.

whether this occurred because truthsocial made them available or the qagg.news board owner had only extracted a sample portion of the nunes beta drops starting on 11 Feb 22 when they added all the new message sources and functions to the aggregate is unknown..

link below is what was there 2 days ago and some speculation about what looked like some kind of initial handshake messaging between nunes and Q at that time (att)...

https://greatawakening.win/p/141rsvahTI/ts-kash-patel-post-rt-q-/

with the new additional nunes drops, later drops of all kinds (Q, scavino, etc) TO one up serial numbers have changed... pushed to higher TO# serial numbers than originally

ok, so what...

there is no knowing why nunes drops were initially incomplete, whether by design or not... setting aside the debate on that and whether the Q now posting on truthsocial is Q or not (despite the cagey denials), suspend disbelief and track this train of thought...

The first "truth" / drop (like this term better) that was a retruth (retweet) / redrop of any earlier message was NunesTO6 / with QTO4 / embedded... (adding two photos to the original graphic)

since it is impossible to redrop / retruth a higher numbered drop i am assuming the the formula is 6 - 4 = 2 and (testing the waters here) this points to 8kun sourced (old) Q drop #2...

Here is the list of TruthSocial Q/Q, Nunes/Q, and Q/Nunes combined drops

TOQ6 - TOQ4 = Q2
TON7 - TOQ4 = Q3
TON76 - TOQ61 = Q15
TOQ85 - TON84 = Q1
TON275 - TOQ15 = Q260

(only surveyed through TO275 att)

and here is a link to those old (8kun) Q drops (retrieval search string was 2,3,15,1,260... however the return is in normal chronological order)

https://qagg.news/?q=%23%232%2C3%2C15%2C1%2C260

that is just one way to test this hypothesis that there is messaging going on between the clients that are showing up on the OTHERS filter for TruthSocial

All kinds of possibilities here... Q resending one of his own messages ( Q / Q drop) could mean to add instead of subtract... or a nunes message with a Q drop embedded could mean add, Q drop with nunes embed could mean subtract --- or vice versa....

will continue to survey till up to date... its a rabbit hole... maybe it leads somewhere many not, however

qagg.news admin is filtering a select group onto the site via Truth/ Others... why them?

if new Q is not old Q, why allow that user in....

why all the very sophisticated upgrades to the site... and update the site the same day that truthsocial went public.... there had to have been considerable coordination, capital and resource outlay to accomplish all the upgrades

there is no money to follow... so its rabbit holes for now...

u/MAGAdeburger u/v8power ... its a rabbit hole guys, and a work in progress,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBjWHBHlvAs

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

things going on over on qagg.news that may or may not of relevence. over the last 24 hours it appears that more of devin nunes beta testing phase drops were allowed through the qagg.news filter... appreciate anyone who has scanned the truth OTHERS option to review and if you come to the same conclusion.

whether this occurred because truthsocial made them available or the qagg.news board owner had only extracted a sample portion of the nunes beta drops starting on 11 Feb 22 when began to all the new message sources and functions to the aggregate is unknown..

link below is what was there 2 days ago and some speculation about what looked like some kind of initial handshake messaging between nunes and Q at that time (att)...

https://greatawakening.win/p/141rsvahTI/ts-kash-patel-post-rt-q-/

with the new additional nunes drops, later drops of all kinds (Q, scavino, etc) TO one up serial numbers have changed... pushed to higher TO# serial numbers than originally

ok, so what...

there is no knowing why nunes drops were incomplete by design or not... setting aside the debate on whether the Q now posting is Q or not (despite the cagey denials) suspend disbelief and track this train of thought...

The first "truth" / drop (like this term better) that was a retruth (retweet) / redrop of any earlier message was TO6 / Q with TO4 / Q embedded... (adding two photos to the original graphic)

since it is impossible to redrop / retruth a higher numbered drop i am assuming the the formula is 6 - 4 = 2 and (testing the waters here) this points to 8kun sourced (old) Q drop #2...

Here is the list of TruthSocial Q/Q, Nunes/Q, and Q/Nunes combined drops

TOQ6 - TOQ4 = Q2
TON7 - TOQ4 = Q3
TON76 - TOQ61 = Q15
TOQ85 - TON84 = Q1
TON275 - TOQ15 = Q260

(only surveyed through TO275 att)

and here is a link to those old (8kun) Q drops (retrieval search string was 2,3,15,1,260... however the return is in normal chronological order)

https://qagg.news/?q=%23%232%2C3%2C15%2C1%2C260

that is just one way to test this hypothesis that there is messaging going on between the clients that are showing up on the OTHERS filter for TruthSocial

All kinds of possibilities here... Q resending one of his own messages ( Q / Q drop) could mean to add instead of subtract... or a nunes message with a Q drop embedded could mean add, Q drop with nunes embed could mean subtract --- or vice versa....

will continue to survey till up to date... its a rabbit hole... maybe it leads somewhere many not, however

qagg.news admin is filtering a select group onto the site via Truth/ Others... why them?

if new Q is not old Q, why allow that user in....

why all the very sophisticated upgrades to the site... and update the site the same day that truthsocial went public.... there had to have been considerable coordination, capital and resource outlay to accomplish all the upgrades

there is no money to follow... so its rabbit holes for now...

u/MAGAdeburger u/v8power ... its a rabbit hole guys, and a work in progress,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBjWHBHlvAs

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

things going on over on qagg.news that may or may not of relevence. over the last 24 hours it appears that more of devin nunes beta testing phase drops were allowed on the qagg.news filter... appreciate anyone who has scanned the truth OTHERS option to review and if you come to the same conclusion.

whether this occurred because truthsocial made them available or the qagg.news board owner had only extracted nunes drops starting on 11 Feb 22 when they added all the news sources to the aggregate is unknown..

link below is what was there 2 days ago and some speculation about what looked like some kind of handshake messaging between nunes and Q at that time (att)

https://greatawakening.win/p/141rsvahTI/ts-kash-patel-post-rt-q-/

with the new additional nunes drops, later drops of all kinds (Q, scavino, etc) TO one serial numbers have changed... pushed to higher TO# serial numbers than originally

ok, so what...

there is no knowing why nunes drops were incomplete by design or not... setting aside the debate on whether the Q now posting is Q or not (despite the cagey denials) suspend disbelief and track this train of thought...

The first "truth" / drop (like this term better) that was a retruth (retweet) / redrop of any earlier message was TO6 / Q with TO4 / Q embedded... (adding two photos to the original graphic)

since it is impossible to redrop / retruth a higher numbered drop i am assuming the the formula is 6 - 4 = 2 and (testing the waters here) this points to 8kun sourced (old) Q drop #2...

Here is the list of TruthSocial Q/Q, Nunes/Q, and Q/Nunes combined drops

TOQ6 - TOQ4 = Q2
TON7 - TOQ4 = Q3
TON76 - TOQ61 = Q15
TOQ85 - TON84 = Q1
TON275 - TOQ15 = Q260

(only surveyed through TO275 att)

and here is a link to those old (8kun) Q drops (retrieval search string was 2,3,15,1,260... however the return is in normal chronological order)

https://qagg.news/?q=%23%232%2C3%2C15%2C1%2C260

that is just one way to test this hypothesis that there is messaging going on between the clients that are showing up on the OTHERS filter for TruthSocial

All kinds of possibilities here... Q resending one of his own messages ( Q / Q drop) could mean to add instead of subtract... or a nunes message with a Q drop embedded could mean add, Q drop with nunes embed could mean subtract --- or vice versa....

will continue to survey till up to date... its a rabbit hole... maybe it leads somewhere many not, however

qagg.news admin is filtering a select group onto the site via Truth/ Others... why them?

if new Q is not old Q, why allow that user in....

why all the very sophisticated upgrades to the site... and update the site the same day that truthsocial went public.... there had to have been considerable coordination, capital and resource outlay to accomplish all the upgrades

there is no money to follow... so its rabbit holes for now...

u/MAGAdeburger u/v8power ... its a rabbit hole guys, and a work in progress,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBjWHBHlvAs

2 years ago
1 score