I know. But do you know what that means, or why? Do you think you know? How certain are you that you know?

Question: how much of your conviction is based on empirical data, facts, conjecture, belief, and/or theory?

Asking for a fren.

For example, DJT re-truthed that in the context of a statement he himself made at his rally, right? Aka "Confirmation of citizenship" while referring to (apparently) horrible laws put in place where no confirmation of citizenship is required in order to vote.

So, how much evidence is there that this re-truth is and/or is not related directly to and only to the confirmation of citizenship statement? And how much evidence is there that this re-truth is in directly related to and in response to requests for 'confirmation' of the authenticity of the recent Q drops?

To me, these are reasonable questions that deserve to be vetted.

For my part, as I suspected, the reality of the nature and purpose of the recent Q drops will emerge over time. Very short time, I think. But, I'm more interested in the impact and effect these drops are having than in watching out for DJT or some such to 'confirm' the validity or authenticity of these drops.

Actually, the 'Q proofs' were never a big thing for me. I primarily came to my conclusions about the authenticity of Q via the nature of the drops and the impact they generated. But maybe that's just me.

Have a great day!

I know. But do you know what that means, or why? Do you think you know? How certain are you that you know?

Question: how much of your conviction is based on empirical data, facts, conjecture, belief, and/or theory?

Asking for a fren.