However, that does not change the fact that the Federal Reserve itself is wholly within the jurisdicion of the US federal government to audit it

This is not true. Our jurisdiction is limited by our laws. If we sign away our jurisdiction through the laws (which are shown in the link I provided) then we have no jurisdiction. We signed over our right to enforce any laws on the Federal Reserve by signing away the right to enforce our laws on the BIS. The Federal Reserve is, by law, an agent of the BIS. None of what I am saying is controversial. If you look at the links in the document I linked in my previous post it makes it perfectly clear. We do NOT have jurisdiction, because we said we don't. That is how it works with Sovereign Entities. We determine ourselves who has what jurisdiction. That is simply the law. You can argue against the constitutionality of the law itself, but you can't argue against that it is the law.

The FR does NOT have sovereign immunity via BIS. They can CLAIM it, but that does not make it so.

THEY didn't claim it, WE did (our government). It is the law. Please look at the links provided.

The Board of Governors do have ONE function that they control, from what I see, and that is they determine the Discount Rate

You may be correct on this. I am still digging into the legal structure of the FOMC, and this was something I thought might be the case as well. It makes no sense to me though, so I am thinking there is probably a loophole somewhere.

Nelson was a meaningless player who lived off the work of his grandfather.

Nothing could be further from the truth. They are all major players. JD himself is likely an agent of the Rothschilds. Yes, JD set up a great deal. I have about a thousand page book coming out that shows all the structure of the system he created. It is incredibly well sourced and will show everything. Discounting the efforts of JD's descendants misses a huge scope of what is, and who the real players are. JD was just one cog in the machine. It wasn't a machine built by him. The evidence suggests it was built many thousands of years ago. I'm not sure how long ago, but I have traced it back in primary sources to at least Babylon. Overplay JD, or underplay the others at the expense of appreciating the real scope of what the evidence suggests.

Having said that, if you have the source for Rockefeller saying it (Primary only, I only work in primary sources) that would be great.

The problem is not the structures

They designed all the structures specifically to commit fuckery. I will show all the evidence to support that statement in my book. The structures are absolutely the problem. There is no reason to have a Corporation (legal entity) except to commit fuckery. It is a legal separation of ownership and control to limit liability of the controllers of the structure. It serves no other purpose than that. The same with Trusts, Foundations, etc. I will show that in painstaking detail soon.

However, that does not change the fact that the Federal Reserve itself is wholly within the jurisdicion of the US federal government to audit it

This is not true. Our jurisdiction is limited by our laws. If we sign away our jurisdiction through the laws (which are shown in the link I provided) then we have no jurisdiction. We signed over our right to enforce any laws on the Federal Reserve by signing away the right to enforce our laws in the BIS. The Federal Reserve is, by law, an agent of the BIS. None of what I am saying is controversial. If you look at the links in the document I linked in my previous post it makes it perfectly clear. We do NOT have jurisdiction, because we said we don't. That is how it works with Sovereign Entities. We determine ourselves who has what jurisdiction. That is simply the law. You can argue against the constitutionality of the law itself, but you can't argue against that it is the law.

The FR does NOT have sovereign immunity via BIS. They can CLAIM it, but that does not make it so.

THEY didn't claim it, WE did (our government). It is the law. Please look at the links provided.

The Board of Governors do have ONE function that they control, from what I see, and that is they determine the Discount Rate

You may be correct on this. I am still digging into the legal structure of the FOMC, and this was something I thought might be the case as well. It makes no sense to me though, so I am thinking there is probably a loophole somewhere.

Nelson was a meaningless player who lived off the work of his grandfather.

Nothing could be further from the truth. They are all major players. JD himself is likely an agent of the Rothschilds. Yes, JD set up a great deal. I have about a thousand page book coming out that shows all the structure of the system he created. It is incredibly well sourced and will show everything. Discounting the efforts of JD's descendants misses a huge scope of what is, and who the real players are. JD was just one cog in the machine. It wasn't a machine built by him. The evidence suggests it was built many thousands of years ago. I'm not sure how long ago, but I have traced it back in primary sources to at least Babylon. Overplay JD, or underplay the others at the expense of appreciating the real scope of what the evidence suggests.

Having said that, if you have the source for Rockefeller saying it (Primary only, I only work in primary sources) that would be great.

The problem is not the structures

They designed all the structures specifically to commit fuckery. I will show all the evidence to support that statement in my book. The structures are absolutely the problem. There is no reason to have a Corporation (legal entity) except to commit fuckery. It is a legal separation of ownership and control to limit liability of the controllers of the structure. It serves no other purpose than that. The same with Trusts, Foundations, etc. I will show that in painstaking detail soon.