Shoulder to shoulder with you in this battle pede. It's the hardest battle in the entire awakening war, but (as you already know) ironically it should be by far among the easiest.
It's sad for me to see otherwise fully awake people fall so easily in-line with the cabalist globe creation. Almost everything associated with it is just plain stupid and ridiculous, but since it comes from authority figures it must be so. Just the concept of the atmosphere alone should be enough to wake up most people. I've seen estimates that the entire mass of the atmosphere is 5.5 quadrillion tons. This is a GAS and WITHOUT A CONTAINER (according to the globalists) and somehow it precisely follows the earth around the sun at ~ 67,000 MPH while also rotating ~ 1000 MPH faster at the "equator" than at the "poles".
Do people ever consider this compared to the devastating damage caused by a direct hit from a tornado? The average tornado wind speed is somewhere around 250 MPH and entire communities are wiped out by them, but I'm expected to believe in the whimsical gentleness of a 5.5 quadrillion ton atmosphere magically speeding along (dragged along) at nearly 270 times that speed?! Give me a break.
As you know nothing puts people at greater risk of being ostracized by their family and friends more than converting to the flat earth model. Pride plays a huge role too. I implore sceptics to at least apply Proverbs 18:13 "He who answers a matter before he hears it - this is folly and disgrace to him", or as the New Living Translation puts it "Spouting off before listening to the facts is both shameful and foolish".
The impossible math of the curve observations (more accurately the no-curve observations) is the nail in the coffin to the globe. I doubt I could bring up any examples you don't already know, but I did come up with a couple of images that if you find useful please feel free to appropriate them.
This first image is intended to very clearly visually illustrate the exponential (rather than linear) impact on target hidden heights as measured from different distances "along with curve":
https://imgur.com/gallery/Z9IL9O0
In the image the distance along the curve from 90 degrees to 110 degrees is exactly the same as from 110 to 130, but the red line "b" is much more than twice as long as the red line "a". I think this helps to illustrate why cameras like the P900 and P1000 have delivered devastating blows to the globe.
This next image combines Google Earth and M.I.T. (the M.I.T. derived formula for the most accurate earth curve calculations) in a way that I hope causes sceptics to at least stop and think about what it is showing.
https://imgur.com/gallery/FtNAJrC
Using a distance that more people might have access to in person (only 3.88 miles) this illustration shows with 100% certainty (at least to those with a reasonably open mind) that the CURVE of the WATER (of only 3.88 miles) is causing a target hidden height equal to the height of an regulation NBA rim (10 feet). In this illustration I'm not arguing whether or not refraction has a material impact on "real world observations". The point is that when isolating for just one variable (the curve of the water), the water curve alone is causing a target hidden height of 10 feet. This means that if a buoy were floating just inside one of the shore lines it would have to be 10 feet tall before it could be seen from the surface of the opposite shore line. If I tried to sell that to people who grew up on this lake (lake Wawasee in Indiana) they would rightly look at me like I had lost my mind. Whether they will admit it or not, globalists MUST accept this math if they expect to be taken seriously, but instead they like to mock the incense burning, spirit animal invoking, bongo drum beating, flat-earth "meetup" nut jobs like you pointed out. It's so much easier to continue going along being their smug selves by so easily defeating the straw man arguments than dealing with the subject seriously.
You know I could go on and on, but this reply is bordering on being embarrassingly long even for a chatterbox like me.
Shoulder to shoulder with you in this battle pede. It's the hardest battle in the entire awakening war, but (as you already know) ironically it should be by far among the easiest.
It's sad for me to see otherwise fully awake people fall so easily in-line with the cabalist globe creation. Almost everything associated with it is just plain stupid and ridiculous, but since it comes from authority figures it must be so. Just the concept of the atmosphere alone should be enough to wake up most people. I've seen estimates that the entire mass of the atmosphere is 5.5 quadrillion tons. This is a GAS and WITHOUT A CONTAINER (according to the globalists) and somehow it precisely follows the earth around the sun at ~ 67,000 MPH while also rotating ~ 1000 MPH faster at the "equator" than at the "poles".
Do people ever consider this compared to the devastating damage caused by a direct hit from a tornado? The average tornado wind speed is somewhere around 250 MPH and entire communities are wiped out by them, but I'm expected to believe in the whimsical gentleness of an atmosphere magically speeding along at nearly 270 times that speed?! Give me a break.
As you know nothing puts people at greater risk of being ostracized by their family and friends more than converting to the flat earth model. Pride plays a huge role too. I implore sceptics to at least apply Proverbs 18:13 "He who answers a matter before he hears it - this is folly and disgrace to him", or as the New Living Translation puts it "Spouting off before listening to the facts is both shameful and foolish".
The impossible math of the curve observations (more accurately the no-curve observations) is the nail in the coffin to the globe. I doubt I could bring up any examples you don't already know, but I did come up with a couple of images that if you find useful please feel free to appropriate them.
This first image is intended to very clearly visually illustrate the exponential (rather than linear) impact on target hidden heights as measured from different distances "along with curve":
https://imgur.com/gallery/Z9IL9O0
In the image the distance along the curve from 90 degrees to 110 degrees is exactly the same as from 110 to 130, but the red line "b" is much more than twice as long as the red line "a". I think this helps to illustrate why cameras like the P900 and P1000 have delivered devastating blows to the globe.
This next image combines Google Earth and M.I.T. (the M.I.T. derived formula for the most accurate earth curve calculations) in a way that I hope causes sceptics to at least stop and think about what it is showing.
https://imgur.com/gallery/FtNAJrC
Using a distance that more people might have access to in person (only 3.88 miles) this illustration shows with 100% certainty (at least to those with a reasonably open mind) that the CURVE of the WATER (of only 3.88 miles) is causing a target hidden height equal to the height of an regulation NBA rim (10 feet). In this illustration I'm not arguing whether or not refraction has a material impact on "real world observations". The point is that when isolating for just one variable (the curve of the water), the water curve alone is causing a target hidden height of 10 feet. This means that if a buoy were floating just inside one of the shore lines it would have to be 10 feet tall before it could be seen from the surface of the opposite shore line. If I tried to sell that to people who grew up on this lake (lake Wawasee in Indiana) they would rightly look at me like I had lost my mind. Whether they will admit it or not, globalists MUST accept this math if they expect to be taken seriously, but instead they like to mock the incense burning, spirit animal invoking, bongo drum beating, flat-earth "meetup" nut jobs like you pointed out. It's so much easier to continue going along being their smug selves by so easily defeating the straw man arguments than dealing with the subject seriously.
You know I could go on and on, but this reply is bordering on being embarrassingly long even for a chatterbox like me.
Shoulder to shoulder with you in this battle pede. It's the hardest battle in the entire awakening war, but (as you already know) ironically it should be by far among the easiest.
It's sad for me to see otherwise fully awake people fall so easily in-line with the cabalist globe creation. Almost everything associated with it is just plain stupid and ridiculous, but since it comes from authority figures it must be so. Just the concept of the atmosphere alone should be enough to wake up most people. I've seen estimates that the entire mass of the atmosphere is 5.5 quadrillion tons. This is a GAS and WITHOUT A CONTAINER (according to the globalists) and somehow it precisely follows the earth around the sun at ~ 67,000 MPH while also rotating ~ 1000 MPH faster at the "equator" than at the "poles".
Do people ever consider this compared to the devastating damage caused by a direct hit from a tornado? The average tornado wind speed is somewhere around 250 MPH and entire communities are wiped out by them, but I'm expected to believe in the whimsical gentleness of an atmosphere magically speeding along at nearly 270 times that speed?! Give me a break.
As you know nothing puts people at greater risk of being ostracized by their family and friends more than converting to the flat earth model. Pride plays a huge role too. I implore sceptics to at least apply Proverbs 18:13 "He who answers a matter before he hears it - this is folly and disgrace to him", or as the New Living Translation puts it "Spouting off before listening to the facts is both shameful and foolish".
The impossible math of the curve observations (more accurately the no-curve observations) is the nail in the coffin to the globe. I doubt I could bring up any examples you don't already know, but I did come up with a couple of images that if you find useful please feel free to appropriate them.
This first image is intended to very clearly visually illustrate the exponential (rather than linear) impact on target hidden heights as measured from different distances "along with curve":
https://imgur.com/gallery/Z9IL9O0
In the image the distance along the curve from 90 degrees to 110 degrees is exactly the same as from 110 to 130, but the red line "b" is much more than twice as long as the red line "a". I think this helps to illustrate why cameras like the P900 and P1000 have delivered devastating blows to the globe.
This next image combines Google Earth and M.I.T. (the M.I.T. derived formula for the most accurate earth curve calculations) in a way that I hope causes sceptics to at least stop and think about what it is showing.
https://imgur.com/gallery/FtNAJrC
Using a distance that more people might have access to in person (only 3.88 miles) this illustration shows with 100% certainty (at least to those with a reasonably open mind) that the CURVE of the WATER (of only 3.88 miles) is causing a target hidden height equal to the height of an regulation NBA rim (10 feet). In this illustration I'm not arguing whether or not refraction has a material impact on "real world observations". The point is that when isolating for just one variable (the curve of the water), the water curve alone is causing a target hidden height of 10 feet. This means that if a buoy were floating just inside one of the shore lines it would have to be 10 feet tall before it could be seen from the surface of the opposite shore line. If I tried to sell that to people who grew up on this lake (lake Wawasee in Indiana) they would rightly look at me like I had lost my mind. Whether they will admit it or not, globalists MUST accept this math if they expect to be taken seriously, but instead they like to mock the incense burning, spirit animal invoking, bongo drum beating, flat-earth "meetup" nut jobs like you pointed out. It's so much more comfortable to just going along being their smug selves by so easily defeating the straw man arguments than dealing with the subject seriously.
You know I could go on and on, but this reply is bordering on being embarrassingly long even for a chatterbox like me.
Shoulder to shoulder with you in this battle pede. It's the hardest battle in the entire awakening war, but (as you already know) ironically it should be by far among the easiest.
It's sad for me to see otherwise fully awake people fall so easily in-line with the cabalist globe creation. Almost everything associated with it is just plain stupid and ridiculous, but since it comes from authority figures it must be so. Just the concept of the atmosphere alone should be enough to wake up most people. I've seen estimates that the entire mass of the atmosphere is 5.5 quadrillion tons. This is a GAS and WITHOUT A CONTAINER (according to the globalists) and somehow it precisely follows the earth around the sun at ~ 67,000 MPH while also rotating ~ 1000 MPH faster at the "equator" than at the "poles".
Do people ever consider this compared to the devastating damage caused by a direct hit from a tornado? The average tornado wind speed is somewhere around 250 MPH and entire communities are wiped out by them, but I'm expected to believe in the whimsical gentleness of an atmosphere magically speeding along at nearly 270 times that speed?! Give me a break.
As you know nothing puts people at greater risk of being ostracized by their family and friends more than converting to the flat earth model. Pride plays a huge role too. I implore sceptics to at least apply Proverbs 18:13 "He who answers a matter before he hears it - this is folly and disgrace to him", or as the New Living Translation puts it "Spouting off before listening to the facts is both shameful and foolish".
The impossible math of the curve observations (more accurately the no-curve observations) is the nail in the coffin to the globe. I doubt I could bring up any examples you don't already know, but I did come up with a couple of images that if you find useful please feel free to appropriate them.
This first image is intended to very clearly visually illustrate the exponential (rather than linear) impact on target hidden heights as measured from different distances "along with curve":
https://imgur.com/gallery/Z9IL9O0
In the image the distance along the curve from 90 degrees to 110 degrees is exactly the same as from 110 to 130, but the red line "b" is much more than twice as long as the red line "a". I think this helps to illustrate why cameras like the P900 and P1000 have delivered devastating blows to the globe.
This next image combines Google Earth and M.I.T. (the M.I.T. derived formula for the most accurate earth curve calculations) in a way that I hope causes sceptics to at least stop and think about what it is showing.
https://imgur.com/gallery/FtNAJrC
Using a distance that more people might have access to in person (only 3.88 miles) this illustration shows with 100% certainty (at least to those with a reasonably open mind) that the CURVE of the WATER (of only 3.88 miles) is causing a target hidden height equal to the height of an regulation NBA rim (10 feet). In this illustration I'm not arguing whether or not refraction has a material impact on "real world observations". The point is that when isolating for just one variable (the curve of the water), the water curve alone is causing a target hidden height of 10 feet. This means that if a buoy were floating just in the inside shore it would have to be 10 feet tall before it could be seen from the surface of the opposite shore line. If I tried to sell that to people who grew up on this lake (lake Wawasee in Indiana) they would rightly look at me like I had lost my mind. Whether they will admit it or not, globalists MUST accept this math if they expect to be taken seriously, but instead they like to mock the incense burning, spirit animal invoking, bongo drum beating, flat-earth "meetup" nut jobs like you pointed out. It's so much more comfortable to just going along being their smug selves by so easily defeating the straw man arguments than dealing with the subject seriously.
You know I could go on and on, but this reply is bordering on being embarrassingly long even for a chatterbox like me.