Here are some curiouser and curiouser particulars concerning the motion of Judge Aileen M. Cannon granting appointment of a Special Master in the case of Trump v United States in regard to the FBI search and seizure of property from Mar A Lago.
First, page 2 of Judge Cannon's motion granting motion to appoint a Special Master. For emphasis, note motion was filed 09/05/22, or in layman's terms... today.
Document 64 / Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Trump v United States filed 09/05/22
Page 2
RELEVANT BACKGROUND
The following is a summary of the record based on the parties’ submissions and oral presentation.1 Throughout 2021, former President Donald J. Trump (“Plaintiff”) and the National Archives and Records Administration (“NARA”) were engaged in conversations concerning records from Plaintiff’s time in office [ECF No. 1 p. 4; ECF No. 48-1 p. 2].2
[bold type face - mine]
See full filing below (24 pages)
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.64.0_3.pdf
Next, page 1 of a letter addressed to Judge Cannon from A distressed US citizen.
[bold type face - mine]
Document 63 / Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Trump v United States filed 09/02/22
O'rane M. Cornish, Sr.,
3767 New Getwell Road,
Memphis, TN 38118.
901/795-4405
United States District Court
Southern District of Florida.
Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr Building
400 NW 1st Avenue
Miami, FL 33128
RE: Case No.22-cv-81294 - and OFFENSIVE filing....
Attn: Hon Aileen M. Cannon (AMC);
August 20, 2022 (date of letter)
While perusing the Yahoo News face page on my computer, I saw an item that announced the attached was filed. I began reading it, and was immediately offended and repulsed by the statement of the very first line the end of which falsely state "... ... ...President ... ... ...". I find this extremely offensive as a citizen of the United States, as a United States Air Force Vietnam-era Veteran (1072-2002) Attach 2 just so you know. The offensive verbiage is highlighted in yellow fyi. It is my fervent hope that your responses, whatever form it takes, to the filing, repudiates the impudent claim evidenced by that verbiage. May I suggest that your very first line state something such as: Movant Donald H. Trump improperly identified as 'President', ... ... .... Fact is, as I am sure you know, the USA has just one President at a time.
To allow such verbiage to go unchallenged, is to give aid and comfort to the continued effort to undermine Democracy; the good order, discipline and freedoms, which have been the hallmarks of the grand experiment - - - the United States of America. Please, I beseech you not to let that arrogant falsity go unchallenged, because it is corrosive to our freedoms - our society, the form of government we chose to live by -- see what happened on January 6th? Further, the Attorneys who submitted the filing should be sanctioned for they should know better.
Respectfully,
[signature]
O'rane M. Cornish, Sr.
A distressed U.S. citizen
[bold face type face O'rane M. Cornish, Sr.. note - some of the text in bold face is originally in italic type face, but the green italic color on GAW sucks, so see original document for original bold and original italic emphasis by O'rane.]
See full filing below for attachments (3 pages):
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.63.0_1.pdf
Document 1 / Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Trump v United States filed 08/22/22
MOTION FOR JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT AND ADDITIONAL RELIEF
President Donald J. Trump ("Movant"), through his undersigned counsel, respectfully files the Motion For Judicial Oversight And Additional Relief, which seeks an order that: (a) appoints a Special Master; (b) enjoins further review of seized materials by the Government until a Special Master is appointed; (c) requires the Government to provide a more detailed Receipt of Property; and (d) requires the Government to return any item seized that was not within the scope of the Search Warrant, and states as follows:
Link docket Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Trump v United States / all filings
Now, on the face of it would appear that in making the observation about how to address President Donald J. Trump by Judge Cannon is the point of this comment. By filing O'rane's letter (filing the letter at all is a mystery in and of itself), and Judge Cannon using former President Trump in her order granting the motion, one might, with understandable logic, conclude a cause and effect relationship based on Orane's letter telling Judge Cannon how to address President Trump in the court's proceedings
A good question could be why was this letter, of all letters the court must be receiving in connection with the case, filed at all on the dockets page? A letter that gets into the official record of the case history not submitted by or through attorneys?
A good subject for conversation would be to opine on whether the fact that Judge Cannon does refer to President Trump as former President Trump in her order granting Movant's request for a Special Master was a result, for what ever reason, of Cornish's letter.
A good question could be, why did the clerk not file a letter dated 20 August 2022 (and assumed sent the 21st by the tone of the the author) and presumably received shortly thereafter, until 02 September 2022?
Original Motion by President Trump, Document 1, was filed on 08/22/22.
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment, Document 2, was filed on 08/22/22
Description of Document 2:
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case.
You can read the descriptions of the filings on the court docket home page for the Trump v United States and get of sense of when what is filed and, furthermore, not available for online viewing (grey tabs on the far right of the page), in contrast to documents that are available to be accessed online (the ones with the blue highlighted tabs for accessing the documents).
Sometimes what you cannot read can be deduced from the description of the filing.
So, here is the issue.
How does a distressed US Citizen in Memphis, TN, on 20 August 2022 have access to a Motion that has not been filed in court until 22 August 2022 and address his letter of offense and repulsion to Judge Aileen M. Cannon, who is not assigned to the case until 22 August 2022."
Orane's letter dated 20 August 2022
Motion to appoint Special Master filed 22 August 2022.
Judge Cannon assigned to decide on the motion 22 August 2022.
Let me offer an answer to my own question:
https://youtu.be/DNy0TElah18 (10 min)
Just sayin...
Here are some curiouser and curiouser particulars concerning the motion of Judge Aileen M. Cannon granting appointment of a Special Master in the case of Trump v United States in regard to the FBI search and seizure of property from Mar A Lago.
First, page 2 of Judge Cannon's motion granting motion to appoint a Special Master. For emphasis, note motion was filed 09/05/22, or in layman's terms... today.
Document 64 / Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Trump v United States filed 09/05/22
Page 2
RELEVANT BACKGROUND
The following is a summary of the record based on the parties’ submissions and oral presentation.1 Throughout 2021, former President Donald J. Trump (“Plaintiff”) and the National Archives and Records Administration (“NARA”) were engaged in conversations concerning records from Plaintiff’s time in office [ECF No. 1 p. 4; ECF No. 48-1 p. 2].2
[bold type face - mine]
See full filing below (24 pages)
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.64.0_3.pdf
Next, page 1 of a letter addressed to Judge Cannon from A distressed US citizen.
[bold type face - mine]
Document 63 / Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Trump v United States filed 09/02/22
O'rane M. Cornish, Sr.,
3767 New Getwell Road,
Memphis, TN 38118.
901/95-4405
United States District Court
Southern District of Florida.
Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr Building
400 NW 1st Avenue
Miami, FL 33128
RE: Case No.22-cv-81294 - and OFFENSIVE filing....
Attn: Hon Aileen M. Cannon (AMC);
August 20, 2022 (date of letter)
While perusing the Yahoo News face page on my computer, I saw an item that announced the attached was filed. I began reading it, and was immediately offended and repulsed by the statement of the very first line the end of which falsely state "... ... ...President ... ... ...". I find this extremely offensive as a citizen of the United States, as a United States Air Force Vietnam-era Veteran (1072-2002) Attach 2 just so you know. The offensive verbiage is highlighted in yellow fyi. It is my fervent hope that your responses, whatever form it takes, to the filing, repudiates the impudent claim evidenced by that verbiage. May I suggest that your very first line state something such as: Movant Donald H. Trump improperly identified as 'President', ... ... .... Fact is, as I am sure you know, the USA has just one President at a time.
To allow such verbiage to go unchallenged, is to give aid and comfort to the continued effort to undermine Democracy; the good order, discipline and freedoms, which have been the hallmarks of the grand experiment - - - the United States of America. Please, I beseech you not to let that arrogant falsity go unchallenged, because it is corrosive to our freedoms - our society, the form of government we chose to live by -- see what happened on January 6th? Further, the Attorneys who submitted the filing should be sanctioned for they should know better.
Respectfully,
[signature]
O'rane M. Cornish, Sr.
A distressed U.S. citizen
[bold face type face O'rane M. Cornish, Sr.. note - some of the text in bold face is originally in italic type face, but the green italic color on GAW sucks, so see original document for original bold and original italic emphasis by O'rane.]
See full filing below for attachments (3 pages):
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.63.0_1.pdf
Document 1 / Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Trump v United States filed 08/22/22
MOTION FOR JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT AND ADDITIONAL RELIEF
President Donald J. Trump ("Movant"), through his undersigned counsel, respectfully files the Motion For Judicial Oversight And Additional Relief, which seeks an order that: (a) appoints a Special Master; (b) enjoins further review of seized materials by the Government until a Special Master is appointed; (c) requires the Government to provide a more detailed Receipt of Property; and (d) requires the Government to return any item seized that was not within the scope of the Search Warrant, and states as follows:
Link docket Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Trump v United States / all filings
Now, on the face of it would appear that in making the observation about how to address President Donald J. Trump by Judge Cannon is the point of this comment. By filing O'rane's letter (filing the letter at all is a mystery in and of itself), and Judge Cannon using former President Trump in her order granting the motion, one might, with understandable logic, conclude a cause and effect relationship based on Orane's letter telling Judge Cannon how to address President Trump in the court's proceedings
A good question could be why was this letter, of all letters the court must be receiving in connection with the case, filed at all on the dockets page? A letter that gets into the official record of the case history not submitted by or through attorneys?
A good subject for conversation would be to opine on whether the fact that Judge Cannon does refer to President Trump as former President Trump in her order granting Movant's request for a Special Master was a result, for what ever reason, of Cornish's letter.
A good question could be, why did the clerk not file a letter dated 20 August 2022 (and assumed sent the 21st by the tone of the the author) and presumably received shortly thereafter, until 02 September 2022?
Original Motion by President Trump, Document 1, was filed on 08/22/22.
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment, Document 2, was filed on 08/22/22
Description of Document 2:
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case.
You can read the descriptions of the filings on the court docket home page for the Trump v United States and get of sense of when what is filed and, furthermore, not available for online viewing (grey tabs on the far right of the page), in contrast to documents that are available to be accessed online (the ones with the blue highlighted tabs for accessing the documents).
Sometimes what you cannot read can be deduced from the description of the filing.
So, here is the issue.
How does a distressed US Citizen in Memphis, TN, on 20 August 2022 have access to a Motion that has not been filed in court until 22 August 2022 and address his letter of offense and repulsion to Judge Aileen M. Cannon, who is not assigned to the case until 22 August 2022."
Orane's letter dated 20 August 2022
Motion to appoint Special Master filed 22 August 2022.
Judge Cannon assigned to decide on the motion 22 August 2022.
Let me offer an answer to my own question:
https://youtu.be/DNy0TElah18 (10 min)
Just sayin...