Based on the fact he is doing some things which could be highly considered Q proofs here.

Come on, whole our side thing is because we believe in Q proofs being legit, and not being some kind of cabal manipulation over us - isn't it?

I would like conclusive 100% undeniable proof about operation being legit to throw it to normies to make them see it or if not to be calm everything will be all right at the end. I have my doubts about Q too,I never were hiding it.

But we don't have conclusive undeniable proofs now.We don't have conclusive undeniable leaks who is who.Sorry.All we really have are our guesswork,Q posts and incidents looking highly related to Q posts,things we call "Q proofs" here

Looking at things we have it is highly probable Musk can be defactor if Q is legit. Is that true ? I don't know. I'm not even 100% sure Q is reliable or not about military doing the job. Q is reliable about cabal,but we would notice it probably alone and that would lead people on the streets in "uncontrollable way". Is that really good thing or bad - and for whom ? I don't know for sure...

I got interesting material from u/Jacobin on conspiracies win. Article by Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule: "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures".

Are they using Q ? Or maybe you shall suspect me I am spreading doubts ? (Yes,you shouldn't trust me too - "paranoid" means "safer" I say I am anon like you,but you shouldn't blindly trust anybody who says that)

Q team can be against cabal - or against us (and in such case being part of cabal). We will see how situation will develop.

Most people here trust Q and think easiest explaination is the best,and those easiest one looks like there could be indeed "white hats" on our side. At least situation with "covid scare" is being getting to normal,lockdowns look ending,so if there are white hats and it isn't some trick - I am grateful for that thing. Hope there are white hats,because if not we would be in very deep and stinky shit.

Based on the fact he is doing some things which could be highly considered Q proofs here.

Come on, whole our side thing is because we believe in Q proofs being legit, and not being some kind of cabal manipulation over us - isn't it?

I would like conclusive 100% undeniable proof about operation being legit to throw it to normies to make them see it or if not to be calm everything will be all right at the end. I have my doubts about Q too,I never were hiding it.

But we don't have conclusive undeniable proofs now.We don't have conclusive undeniable leaks who is who.Sorry.All we really have are our guesswork,Q posts and incidents looking highly related to Q posts,things we call "Q proofs" here

Looking at things we have it is highly probable Musk can be defactor if Q is legit. Is that true ? I don't know. I'm not even 100% sure Q is reliable or not about military doing the job. Q is reliable about cabal,but we would notice it probably alone and that would lead people on the streets in "uncontrollable way". Is that really good thing or bad - and for whom ? I don't know for sure...

I got interesting material from u/Jacobin on conspiracies win. Article by Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule: "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures".

Are they using Q ? Or maybe you shall suspect me I am spreading doubts ? (Yes,you shouldn't trust me too - "paranoid" means "safer" I say I am anon like you,but you shouldn't blindly trust anybody who says that)

Q team can be against cabal - or against us (and in such case being part of cabal). We will see how situation will develop.

Most people here trust Q and think easiest explaination is the best,and those easiest one looks like there could be indeed "white hats" on our side. Hope so,because if not we would be in very deep and stinky shit.

Based on the fact he is doing some things which could be highly considered Q proofs here.

Come on, whole our side thing is because we believe in Q proofs being legit, and not being some kind of cabal manipulation over us - isn't it?

I would like conclusive 100% undeniable proof about operation being legit to throw it to normies to make them see it or if not to be calm everything will be all right at the end. I have my doubts about Q too,I never were hiding it.

But we don't have conclusive undeniable proofs now.We don't have conclusive undeniable leaks who is who.Sorry.All we really have are our guesswork,Q posts and incidents looking highly related to Q posts,things we call "Q proofs" here

Looking at things we have it is highly probable Musk can be defactor if Q is legit. Is that true ? I don't know. I'm not even 100% sure Q is reliable or not about military doing the job. Q is reliable about cabal,but we would notice it probably alone and that would lead people on the streets in "uncontrollable way". Is that really good thing or bad - and for whom ? I don't know for sure...

I got interesting material from u/Jacobin on conspiracies win. Article by Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule: "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures".

Are they using Q ? Or maybe you shall suspect me I am spreading doubts ? (Yes,you shouldn't trust me too - "paranoid" means "safer" I say I am anon like you,but you shouldn't blindly trust anybody who says that)

Q team can be against cabal - or against us (and in such case being part of cabal). We will see how situation will develop.

Most people here trust Q and think easiest explaination is the best,and those easiest one looks like there could be indeed "white hats" on our side. Hope so,because if not we would be in very deep and stinky shit.

Based on the fact he is doing some things which could be highly considered Q proofs here.

Come on, whole our side thing is because we believe in Q proofs being legit, and not being some kind of cabal manipulation over us - isn't it?

I would like conclusive 100% undeniable proof about operation being legit to throw it to normies to make them see it or if not to be calm everything will be all right at the end. I have my doubts about Q too,I never were hiding it.

But we don't have conclusive undeniable proofs now.We don't have conclusive undeniable leaks who is who.Sorry.All we really have are our guesswork,Q posts and incidents looking highly related to Q posts,things we call "Q proofs" here

Looking at things we have it is highly probable Musk can be defactor if Q is legit. Is that true ? I don't know. I'm not even 100% sure Q is reliable or not about military doing the job. Q is reliable about cabal,but we would notice it probably alone and that would lead people on the streets in "uncontrollable way". Is that really good thing or bad - and for whom ? I don't know for sure...

I got interesting material from u/Jacobin on conspiracies win. Article by Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule: "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures".

Are they using Q ? Or maybe you shall suspect me I am spreading doubts ? (Yes,you shouldn't trust me too - "paranoid" means "safer")

Q team can be against cabal - or against us (and in such case being part of cabal). We will see how situation will develop.

Most people here trust Q and think easiest explaination is the best,and those easiest one looks like there could be indeed "white hats" on our side. Hope so,because if not we would be in very deep and stinky shit.

Based on the fact he is doing some things which could be highly considered Q proofs here.

Come on, whole our side thing is because we believe in Q proofs being legit, and not being some kind of cabal manipulation over us - isn't it?

I would like conclusive 100% undeniable proof about operation being legit to throw it to normies to make them see it or if not to be calm everything will be all right at the end. I have my doubts about Q too,I never were hiding it.

But we don't have conclusive undeniable proofs now.We don't have conclusive undeniable leaks who is who.Sorry.All we really have are our guesswork,Q posts and incidents looking highly related to Q posts,things we call "Q proofs" here

Looking at things we have it is highly probable Musk can be defactor if Q is legit. Is that true ? I don't know. I'm not even 100% sure Q is reliable or not about military doing the job. Q is reliable about cabal,but we would notice it probably alone and that would lead people on the streets in "uncontrollable way". Is that really good thing or bad - and for whom ? I don't know for sure...

I got interesting material from u/Jacobin on conspiracies win. Article by Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule: "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures".

Are they using Q ? Or maybe you shall suspect me I am spreading doubts ? (Yes,you shouldn't trust me too - "paranoid" means "safer")

Q team can be against cabal - or against us (and in such case being part of cabal). We will see how situation will develop.

Most people think easiest explaination is the best,and easiest one looks like there could be indeed "white hats" on our side.

Based on the fact he is doing some things which could be highly considered Q proofs here.

Come on, whole our side thing is because we believe in Q proofs being legit, and not being some kind of cabal manipulation over us - isn't it?

I would like conclusive 100% undeniable proof about operation being legit to throw it to normies to make them see it or if not to be calm everything will be all right at the end. I have my doubts about Q too,I never were hiding it.

But we don't have conclusive undeniable proofs now.We don't have conclusive undeniable leaks who is who.Sorry.All we really have are our guesswork,Q posts and incidents looking highly related to Q posts,things we call "Q proofs" here

Looking at things we have it is highly probable Musk can be defactor if Q is legit. Is that true ? I don't know. I'm not even 100% sure Q is reliable or not about military doing the job. Q is reliable about cabal,but we would notice it probably alone and that would lead people on the streets in "uncontrollable way". Is that really good thing or bad - and for whom ? I don't know for sure...

I got interesting material from u/Jacobin on conspiracies win. Article by Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule: "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures".

Are they using Q ? Or maybe you shall suspect me I am spreading doubts ? (Yes,you shouldn't trust me too - "paranoid" means "safer")

Q team can be against cabal - or against us (and in such case being part of cabal). We will see how situation will develop.

Based on the fact he is doing some things which could be highly considered Q proofs here.

Come on, whole our side thing is because we believe in Q proofs being legit, and not being some kind of cabal manipulation over us - isn't it?

I would like conclusive 100% undeniable proof about operation being legit to throw it to normies to make them see it or if not to be calm everything will be all right at the end. I have my doubts about Q too,I never were hiding it.

But we don't have conclusive undeniable proofs now.We don't have conclusive undeniable leaks who is who.Sorry.All we really have are our guesswork,Q posts and incidents looking highly related to Q posts,things we call "Q proofs" here

Looking at things we have it is highly probable Musk can be defactor if Q is legit. Is that true ? I don't know. I'm not even 100% sure Q is reliable or not about military doing the job. Q is reliable about cabal,but we would notice it probably alone and that would lead people on the streets in "uncontrollable way". Is that really good thing or bad - and for whom ? I don't know for sure...

I got interesting material from u/Jacobin on conspiracies win. Article by Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule: "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures".

Q team can be against cabal - or against us (and in such case being part of cabal). We will see how situation will develop.

Based on the fact he is doing some things which could be highly considered Q proofs here.

Come on, whole our side thing is because we believe in Q proofs being legit, and not being some kind of cabal manipulation over us - isn't it?

I would like conclusive 100% undeniable proof about operation being legit to throw it to normies to make them see it or if not to be calm everything will be all right at the end. I have my doubts about Q too,I never were hiding it.

But we don't have conclusive undeniable proofs now.We don't have conclusive undeniable leaks who is who.Sorry.All we really have are our guesswork,Q posts and incidents looking highly related to Q posts,things we call "Q proofs" here

Looking at things we have it is highly probable Musk can be defactor if Q is legit. Is that true ? I don't know. I'm not even 100% sure Q is reliable.

I got interesting material from u/Jacobin on conspiracies win. Article by Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule: "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures".

Q can be against cabal - or against us.

Based on the fact he is doing some things which could be highly considered Q proofs here.

Come on, whole our side thing is because we believe in Q proofs being legit, and not being some kind of cabal manipulation over us - isn't it?

I would like conclusive 100% undeniable proof about operation being legit to throw it to normies to make them see it or if not to be calm everything will be all right at the end. I have my doubts about Q too,I never were hiding it.

But we don't have conclusive undeniable proofs now.We don't have conclusive undeniable leaks who is who.Sorry.All we really have are our guesswork,Q posts and incidents looking highly related to Q posts,things we call "Q proofs" here

Looking at things we have it is highly probable Musk can be defactor if Q is legit.

Based on the fact he is doing some things which could be highly considered Q proofs here.

Come on, whole our side thing is because we believe in Q proofs being legit, and not being some kind of cabal manipulation over us - isn't it?

I would like conclusive 100% undeniable proof about operation being legit to throw it to normies to make them see it or if not to be calm everything will be all right at the end. I have my doubts about Q too,I never were hiding it.

But we don't have conclusive undeniable proofs now.We don't have conclusive undeniable leaks who is who.Sorry.All we really have are our guesswork,Q posts and incidents looking highly related to Q posts.

Looking at things we have it is highly probable Musk can be defactor if Q is legit.

Based on the fact he is doing some things which could be highly considered Q proofs here.