Reason: None provided.
LoL. "Private company"
Yes, it is, now. But a private company violating the Constitution on the government's behalf is the government violating the Constitution.
Also, we need to enshrine in the Constitution that any publicly held company is at the privilege of and adherent to the Constitution.
1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original
LoL. "Private company"
Yes, it is, now. But a private company violating the Constitution on the government's behalf is the government violating the Constitution.
1 year ago
1 score