This should be easily verified by the SC's own publications.

Edit:

Incorrect. It has NOT been accepted for a hearing. It has been accepted to the docket (it has been docketed) which by and large has nothing to do with the virtues of the case. Being docketed simply means that the clerks of the court have accepted registration of the case as one that the court will CONSIDER whether to take or not (whether to move to an actual hearing or not).

On the docket, it shows it has been "distributed for conference", meaning the court will discuss it on Jan 6 and decide IF it warrants a hearing or not - whether they will hold an actual hearing it or not.

Docket:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html

Note: We don't have to always simply accept what people say, but easy basic research can be done to actually find out for ourselves. That's actually what Q exhorted anons to do, while also emphasizing "be careful who you follow"!!

This should be easily verified by the SC's own publications.

Edit:

Incorrect. It has NOT been accepted for a hearing. It has been accepted to the docket (it has been docketed) which by and large has nothing to do with the virtues of the case. Being docketed simply means that the clerks of the court have accepted registration of the case as one that the court will CONSIDER whether to take or not (whether to move to an actual hearing or not).

Docket:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html

Note: We don't have to always simply accept what people say, but easy basic research can be done to actually find out for ourselves. That's actually what Q exhorted anons to do, while also emphasizing "be careful who you follow"!!

This should be easily verified by the SC's own publications.