Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: Math skillz not up to par

At the risk of being accused of dooming/low energy/"shut up contrarian!", I'm going to apply some skepticism here:

This dude's presentation is hot garbage. Sorry. It has got to be said. He has no idea what his narrative is supposed to be. His slides are all out of order. He's trying to make links of clues and it's just a confused mess. He asks questions, let's go to this... then he completely changes tack and starts talking about something else. He has few clear links to follow this trail through Q posts. And his confirmations are a confused mess of numerology. If you're going to do a decode, you need to show people the logical flow from link to link.

SerialBrain2 on Reddit used to do proper decodes. He'd walk you through step by step with his decodes, showing clear links from step to step, and he used consistent methodology. That's key. If you encode something, you use a set of rules. When you decode it, you'd need to use the same set of rules.

This "decode" is a disjointed mess. Sometimes he's using caps --> gematria. He's selective about what he picks too. HEART is in all caps but he does no gematria on that. He simply word searches Q posts to find #634 and calls that confirmation. He pulls in Dan Scavino's TS post. Fair enough, but why? And he picks that one still out of the whole video and calls it confirmation. Typically we'd be supplied with a time stamp for something like that. Where in the video right? Nothing. No link. Adding up numbers to get the marker 9 was a big one for me. It is incredibly easy to find things that reduce to it. Tomorrow's date is 1/12/23: 1+1+2+2+3. Look, I found Marker [9]. It's habbening tomorrow! Or was that 1/3/23? Or 1/21/23? Or 1/1/2023? Inconsistent methodology and sloppy use of numerology.

Maybe he's got a partial decode. I'm open to the possibility, but I think his conclusions are unsupported. I'm not a fan of the datefagging. Trump says he's not using Twitter, only his own Truth Social now. We just got an 11.3 from Elon Musk last week. Others still think it refers to a legal code. But this guy says move the punctuation to 1/13, then change the whole calendar system we're using because of a completely unlinked comment about putting Christ back in Christmas, ignore the year (we'll just fill in the blanks whenever it happens, right? No need to confirm that in our datefagging), et voila! Barack Obama perp walked on Friday! See? Q told us all along! /cynicism.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

At the risk of being accused of dooming/low energy/"shut up contrarian!", I'm going to apply some skepticism here:

This dude's presentation is hot garbage. Sorry. It has got to be said. He has no idea what his narrative is supposed to be. His slides are all out of order. He's trying to make links of clues and it's just a confused mess. He asks questions, let's go to this... then he completely changes tack and starts talking about something else. He has few clear links to follow this trail through Q posts. And his confirmations are a confused mess of numerology. If you're going to do a decode, you need to show people the logical flow from link to link.

SerialBrain2 on Reddit used to do proper decodes. He'd walk you through step by step with his decodes, showing clear links from step to step, and he used consistent methodology. That's key. If you encode something, you use a set of rules. When you decode it, you'd need to use the same set of rules.

This "decode" is a disjointed mess. Sometimes he's using caps --> gematria. He's selective about what he picks too. HEART is in all caps but he does no gematria on that. He simply word searches Q posts to find #634 and calls that confirmation. He pulls in Dan Scavino's TS post. Fair enough, but why? And he picks that one still out of the whole video and calls it confirmation. Typically we'd be supplied with a time stamp for something like that. Where in the video right? Nothing. No link. Adding up numbers to get the marker 9 was a big one for me. It is incredibly easy to find things that reduce to it. Today's date is 1/11/23: 1+1+2+2+3. Look, I found Marker [9]. It's habbening today! Inconsistent methodology and sloppy use of numerology.

Maybe he's got a partial decode. I'm open to the possibility, but I think his conclusions are unsupported. I'm not a fan of the datefagging. Trump says he's not using Twitter, only his own Truth Social now. We just got an 11.3 from Elon Musk last week. Others still think it refers to a legal code. But this guy says move the punctuation to 1/13, then change the whole calendar system we're using because of a completely unlinked comment about putting Christ back in Christmas, ignore the year (we'll just fill in the blanks whenever it happens, right? No need to confirm that in our datefagging), et voila! Barack Obama perp walked on Friday! See? Q told us all along! /cynicism.

1 year ago
1 score