Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Yeah, we’re still the anti-science conspiracy theorists who merely “disagreed” with what was going on, but had no scientific basis for it.

We didn’t like what was happening, but were too stupid to use fancy words to express ourselves, so we caveman grunted our way over to the witch doctor who told us the virus was a secret extra terrestrial invasion.

This is yet another “the moron science deniers got lucky and guessed right” article, right along with Scott Adams’ narrative.

In actuality, the opposite happened.

We, with guidance from ACTUAL experts, did our own actual analysis to scientifically support the lab leak theory, the efficacy and harm of masks, the ability for HCQ and Ivermectin to promote cell oxygen uptake, the reasons why ventilators wouldn’t work, antibody dependent enhancement, etc.

They labeled actual science as a conspiracy theory.

In short, WE were the ones with the “proper lexicon” and they were the ones too stupid to follow it, so they reactively labeled everything they didn’t understand as conspiracy.

So, I’m not going to be happy until they admit not just that they were wrong, but that they were actively swindled by a tyrannical government that they support and continue to support, and denied the ACTUAL science.

They need to admit that WE are the science now.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Yeah, we’re still the anti-science conspiracy theorists who merely “disagreed” with what was going on, but had no scientific basis for it.

We didn’t like what was happening, but were too stupid to use fancy words to express ourselves, so we caveman grunted our way over to the witch doctor who told us the virus was a secret extra terrestrial invasion.

This is yet another “the moron science deniers got lucky and guessed right” article, right along with Scott Adams’ narrative.

In actuality, the opposite happened. We analyzed Wuhan to conclude that it leaked from a lab. We analyzed the US funding and timing of release to conclude that we may have intentionally leaked it.

We researched HCQ and Ivermectin and the mechanisms of them in promoting cell uptake of Zinc delivery to aid in recovery of respiratory disease, and analyzed why force feeding oxygen via ventilators not only wouldn’t work, but would cause more deaths.

We analyzed the mRNA vaccine and, with guidance from the actual creator of the platform, we were the ones warning of antibody dependent enhancement.

We researched Remdesivir’s openly available data showing 25% organ failure and a less than 10% increase in recovery from severe COVID - way less than even the lowest Ivermectin studies.

They labeled actual science as a conspiracy theory.

In short, WE were the ones with the “proper lexicon” and they were the ones too stupid to follow it, so they reactively labeled everything they didn’t understand as conspiracy.

So, I’m not going to be happy until they admit not just that they were wrong, but that they were actively swindled by a tyrannical government that they support and continue to support, and denied the ACTUAL science.

They need to admit that WE are the science now.

1 year ago
1 score