Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I’ve always wondered if there’s a behind the scenes conflict between Charles and William. I think all the bad PR Charles had before the queen died (about money laundering etc) was instigated by the queen because she didn’t want him on the throne but was powerless to act other than to obliquely pressure him to abdicate. When Diana was killed the queen took a very prominent hand in Williams upbringing, more so than his father. I got the impression she was more influential on him than anyone else and that he may play dutiful son but keeps his father at arms length. I always wondered if the queen was a figurehead of the masons (could not lead as she was female) and was basically silenced about stuff by the cabal taking out Diana - their highest profile “star”. There have long been rumors that Diana was somehow connected to journalist Jill Dando who was murdered around the time of Diana’s death. The theory is that dando got wind of the high profile pedo networks and was digging into it and Diana had found information also. Interestingly Jill Dando’s fiancé at her death - Dr Alan Farthing - went on to become one of the Royal Physicians. Convenient eh? If the queen was in charge of the cabal why did they seem to try to pressure her to disrupt Brexit by snaring her idiot son and grandson? I think the queen was urged to speak out against Brexit by Cabal via Markles snaring her stupid grandson but the queen didn’t do it. That pissed them off and plus then I think markle (who -as a former yacht girl working via soho house which is owned by Ron Burkle and she was also very close with JohnFitzpatrick who’s a major democrat donor and she bas been in the orbit of the Clinton foundation and Obama for years - was sent in as a honeypot influence agent) jumped the fence and went off the rez by marrying the dimwit thinking she could parlay the exposure into long term financial power because being mata hari has a shelf life that she was fast aging out of

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I’ve always wondered if there’s a behind the scenes conflict between Charles and William. I think all the bad PR Charles had before the queen died (about money laundering etc) was instigated by the queen because she didn’t want him on the throne but was powerless to act other than to obliquely pressure him to abdicate. When Diana was killed the queen took a very prominent hand in Williams upbringing, more so than his father. I always wondered if the queen was a figurehead of the masons (could not lead as she was female) and was basically silenced about stuff by the canal taking out Diana - their highest profile “star”. I think the queen was urged to speak out against Brexit by Cabal via Markles snaring her idiot grandson but she didn’t do it. That pissed them off and plus I think markle (who was sent in as a honeypot influence agent) jumped the fence and went off the rez by marrying the dimwit thinking she could parlay the exposure into long term financial power because being mata hari has a shelf life that she was fast aging out of

1 year ago
1 score