Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Sigh, sometimes, I wonder if I should even bother pointing it out....

Schwab is such an evil creature, that he's the clickbait artist's wet dream.

The tweet here has: "SOURCED from a clickbait site" all over it.

But almost NONE of the comments here even question it. Sauce (of the assertions)? None.

In fact, if you track the actual tweet down, You'll see a relevant community note pointing out that Schwab says no such thing in the tweeter's own material (videos etc).

The fact that this is so obviously clickbait (persuasive assertions feeding directly into emotionally triggering subjects and biases but with no real, solid saucing or basis beyond "assertion") and no one here even bothers to question - I always find that disconcerting.

To the extent that GAW pedes fail to man up and start actually applying some Q-ish methods (checking emotional reactions, applying logic, research, verification, empirical review, and a focus on INTEGRITY of information), well, we're part of the problem that we purport to actually want to solve.

https://twitter.com/MattWallace888/status/1682998836690599938

200+ upvotes, 63 comments, almost ZERO vetting, questioning, or application of critical thinking to the actual post.

Sigh.

It's going to be a loooong 2nd half of 2023.

303 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Sigh, at some point I just think: "Maybe I should just give up."

Schwab is such an evil creature, that he's the clickbait artist's wet dream.

The tweet here has: "SOURCED from a clickbait site" all over it.

But almost NONE of the comments here even question it. Sauce (of the assertions)? None.

In fact, if you track the actual tweet down, You'll see a relevant community note pointing out that Schwab does no such thing.

The fact that this is so obviously clickbait (persuasive assertions feeding directly into emotionally triggering subjects and biases but with no real, solid saucing or basis beyond "assertion") and no one here even bothers to question it is disconcerting.

To the extent that GAW pedes fail to man up and start actually applying some Q-ish methods (checking emotional reactions, applying logic, research, verification, empirical review, and a focus on INTEGRITY of information), well, we're part of the problem that we purport to actually want to solve.

https://twitter.com/MattWallace888/status/1682998836690599938

200+ upvotes, 63 comments, almost ZERO vetting, questioning, or application of critical thinking to the actual post.

Sigh.

It's going to be a loooong 2nd half of 2023.

303 days ago
1 score