Your interpretation is flawed. You draw certain assumptions and conclusions based on your own narrow perspective, and even go on to mind-boggle yourself with those posited 'explanations'.

You therefore interpret (other) people's approach as "overlooking" and "make excuses for" Musk, and you post a rather flimsy and denigrating strawman reason "just (aka only) because....", which is really a sad (sorry to say this) liberal tactic of belittling those you disagree with by positing a superficial reasoning for them making choices and having a positive view about someone you think is reprehensible.

Take what you've written here, and substitute TRUMP for MUSK, switch the examples around appropriately, and tell me how this line or argumentation differs from what the Liberal pundits and propaganda machine say about people who support Donald Trump.

"It's really worrying that people are willing to overlook Trump's obvious criminality and make excuses for him, just because he appeals to their racist tendencies".

If you cannot see the overwhelming similarity, then I don't know what to say.

Also, ask whether you aren't doing exactly what you assert (accuse, really) those who see Musk differently to you, aka as a positive actor in this war, of doing?

Do you overlook and ignore the positive impacts that Musks actions and engagement in the information war are having, simply because to even look at those and question them objectively would contradict your view that he's "not a white hat"? Are you "making excuses" for ignoring those positive impacts by pointing to what you consider proof of moral corruption?

You even go on to assert that the ONLY reason people see Musk's role positively or might consider his role a positive one (aka different to your obvious opinion and view) is "just because (he) trolls liberals occasionally on Twitter/X".

Are you unable to consider that some people might be looking at the Musk issue through a different prism to yours, one that has some value, one that might offer a different conclusion?

Again, swap Musk for "DJT" here and ask yourself, why do I see things this way, and why am I asserting that "the only reason people" would do "willing to overlook and make excuses" (which is really a derogatory characterization and has a clear negative nuance) is because (extremely superficial reason).

I'd like to challenge you to think about this for a bit. We're all anons here. We're all (well, most of us) intent on expanding our thinking processes, of working through the fog and the fumes of the disinformation and programming we've been subjected to for decades. Well, that requires a certain amount of dispassionate reflection on HOW we ourselves think and approach what is happening.

Most of we anons are highly moral people, and have high standards. But we are also thinking people who make an effort to see through the fog to find truth. And, many of us understand all too well about the flaws in human nature, including our own.

I don't have any issue with you having a different opinion Re: Elon Musk, but the line of reasoning and argument you make in your comment here leaves some doubt (to me, anyway) about how far you are thinking about your OWN reasons and views and possibly biases in arriving at your conclusions.

A final note:

If God was unable to work through even (very) flawed people at times, neither you, nor I, nor anyone else would be here.

Maybe Musk is a bad guy, or maybe he isn't. Maybe he's a very flawed individual who nonetheless is trying to do positive things for humanity, DESPITE his own mistakes and flaws. Or maybe he a closet satanist who is going to lead the world to the NWO by decieving everyone.

If its the latter, he's doing a CRAP job, because the level of exposure he is driving directly into normie world Re: govt (and intel agency) influence and manipulation of social media (i.e twitter) is frankly unparalleled. Could the Freedom Caucus in the House being exposing weaponization of govt as much as they are if not the for entire Twitter Files Musk thing? (no).

Now, he's directly exposing a massive organization (which many anons AND others know is extremely shady if not a direct CIA/Mossad asset) directly working to manipulate and control social media and not just twitter.

We can argue about what impact these things are actually having, but the fact of him doing them is not speculation. It's actual.

I suggest that maybe your fellow anons actually have good reasons for seeing Musk from a different angle to you, as opposed only doing this because "he trolls liberals on Twitter occasionally".

Just my $0.02.

Your interpretation is flawed. You draw certain assumptions and conclusions based on your own narrow perspective, and even go on to mind-boggle yourself with those posited 'explanations'.

You therefore interpret (other) people's approach as "overlooking" and "make excuses for" Musk, and you post a rather flimsy and denigrating strawman reason "just (aka only) because....", which is really a sad (sorry to say this) liberal tactic of belittling those you disagree with by positing a superficial reasoning for them making choices and having a positive view about someone you think is reprehensible.

Take what you've written here, and substitute TRUMP for MUSK, switch the examples around appropriately, and tell me how this line or argumentation differs from what the Liberal pundits and propaganda machine say about people who support Donald Trump.

"It's really worrying that people are willing to overlook Trump's obvious criminality and make excuses for him, just because he appeals to their racist tendencies".

If you cannot see the overwhelming similarity, then I don't know what to say.

Also, ask whether you aren't doing exactly what you assert (accuse, really) those who see Musk differently to you, aka as a positive actor in this war, of doing?

Do you overlook and ignore the positive impacts that Musks actions and engagement in the information war are having, simply because to even look at those and question them objectively would contradict your view that he's "not a white hat"? Are you "making excuses" for ignoring those positive impacts by pointing to what you consider proof of moral corruption?

You even go on to assert that the ONLY reason people see Musk's role positively or might consider his role a positive one (aka different to your obvious opinion and view) is "just because (he) trolls liberals occasionally on Twitter/X".

Are you unable to consider that some people might be looking at the Musk issue through a different prism to yours, one that has some value, one that might offer a different conclusion?

Again, swap Musk for "DJT" here and ask yourself, why do I see things this way, and why am I asserting that "the only reason people" would do "willing to overlook and make excuses" (which is really a derogatory characterization and has a clear negative nuance) is because (extremely superficial reason).

I'd like to challenge you to think about this for a bit. We're all anons here. We're all (well, most of us) intent on expanding our thinking processes, of working through the fog and the fumes of the disinformation and programming we've been subjected to for decades. Well, that requires a certain amount of dispassionate reflection on HOW we ourselves think and approach what is happening.

Most of we anons are highly moral people, and have high standards. But we are also thinking people who make an effort to see through the fog to find truth. And, many of us understand all too well about the flaws in human nature, including our own.

I don't have any issue with you having a different opinion Re: Elon Musk, but the line of reasoning and argument you make in your comment here leaves some doubt (to me, anyway) about how far you are thinking about your OWN reasons and views and possibly biases in arriving at your conclusions.

A final note:

If God was unable to work through even (very) flawed people at times, neither you, nor I, nor anyone else would be here.

Maybe Musk is a bad guy, or maybe he isn't. Maybe he's a very flawed individual who nonetheless is trying to do positive things for humanity, DESPITE his own mistakes and flaws. Or maybe he a closet satanist who is going to lead the world to the NWO by decieving everyone.

If its the latter, he's doing a CRAP job, because the level of exposure he is driving directly into normie world Re: govt (and intel agency) influence and manipulation of social media (i.e twitter) is astonishing. Could the Freedom Caucus in the House being exposing weaponization of govt as much as they are if not the for entire Twitter Musk thing? (no).

Now, he's directly exposing a massive organization directly working to manipulate and control social media and not just twitter).

We can argue about what impact these things are actually having, but the fact of him doing them is not speculation. It's actual.

I suggest that maybe your fellow anons actually have good reasons for seeing Musk from a different angle to you, as opposed only doing this because "he trolls liberals on Twitter occasionally".

Just my $0.02.

Your interpretation is flawed. You draw certain assumptions and conclusions based on your own narrow perspective, and even go on to mind-boggle yourself with those posited 'explanations'.

You therefore interpret (other) people's approach as "overlooking" and "make excuses for" Musk, and you post a rather flimsy and denigrating strawman reason "just (aka only) because....", which is really a sad (sorry to say this) liberal tactic of belittling those you disagree with by positing a superficial reasoning for them making choices and having a positive view about someone you think is reprehensible.

Take what you've written here, and substitute TRUMP for MUSK, switch the examples around appropriately, and tell me how this line or argumentation differs from what the Liberal pundits and propaganda machine say about people who support Donald Trump.

"It's really worrying that people are willing to overlook Trump's obvious criminality and make excuses for him, just because he appeals to their racist tendencies".

If you cannot see the overwhelming similarity, then I don't know what to say.

Also, ask whether you aren't doing exactly what you assert (accuse, really) those who see Musk differently to you, aka as a positive actor in this war, of doing?

Do you overlook and ignore the positive impacts that Musks actions and engagement in the information war are having, simply because to even look at those and question them objectively would contradict your view that he's "not a white hat"? Are you "making excuses" for ignoring those positive impacts by pointing to what you consider proof of moral corruption?

You even go on to assert that the ONLY reason people see Musk's role positively or might consider his role a positive one (aka different to your obvious opinion and view) is "just because (he) trolls liberals occasionally on Twitter/X".

Are you unable to consider that some people might be looking at the Musk issue through a different prism to yours, one that has some value, one that might offer a different conclusion?

Again, swap Musk for "DJT" here and ask yourself, why do I see things this way, and why am I asserting that "the only reason people" would do "willing to overlook and make excuses" (which is really a derogatory characterization and has a clear negative nuance) is because (extremely superficial reason).

I'd like to challenge you to think about this for a bit. We're all anons here. We're all (well, most of us) intent on expanding our thinking processes, of working through the fog and the fumes of the disinformation and programming we've been subjected to for decades. Well, that requires a certain amount of dispassionate reflection on HOW we ourselves think and approach what is happening.

Most of we anons are highly moral people, and have high standards. But we are also thinking people who make an effort to see through the fog to find truth.

I don't have any issue with you having a different opinion Re: Elon Musk, but the line of reasoning and argument you make in your comment here leaves some doubt (to me, anyway) about how far you are thinking about your OWN reasons and views and possibly biases in arriving at your conclusions.

A final note:

If God was unable to work through even (very) flawed people at times, neither you, nor I, nor anyone else would be here.

Maybe Musk is a bad guy, or maybe he isn't. Maybe he's a very flawed individual who nonetheless is trying to do positive things for humanity, DESPITE his own mistakes and flaws. Or maybe he a closet satanist who is going to lead the world to the NWO by decieving everyone.

If its the latter, he's doing a CRAP job, because the level of exposure he is driving directly into normie world Re: govt (and intel agency) influence and manipulation of social media (i.e twitter) is astonishing. Could the Freedom Caucus in the House being exposing weaponization of govt as much as they are if not the for entire Twitter Musk thing? (no).

Now, he's directly exposing a massive organization directly working to manipulate and control social media and not just twitter).

We can argue about what impact these things are actually having, but the fact of him doing them is not speculation. It's actual.

I suggest that maybe your fellow anons actually have good reasons for seeing Musk from a different angle to you, as opposed only doing this because "he trolls liberals on Twitter occasionally".

Just my $0.02.

Your interpretation is flawed. You draw certain assumptions and conclusions based on your own narrow perspective, and even mind-boggle yourself with those.

You therefore interpret (ALL) people's approach as "overlooking" and "make excuses for" Musk, and you post a fake, strawman reason "just because" which is really a sad (sorry to say this) liberal tactic of belittling those you disagree with by positing a superficial reasoning for them making choices and having a positive =view about someone you think is reprehensible.

Take what you've written here, and substitute TRUMP for MUSK, switch the examples around appropriately, and tell me how this line or argumentation differs from what the Liberal pundits and propaganda machine say about people who support Donald Trump.

If you cannot see the overwhelming similarity, then I don't know what to say.

Ask whether you aren't doing exactly what you assert (accuse, really) those who might see Musk differently, aka as a positive actor in this war, of doing?

Do you overlook and ignore the positive impacts that Musks actions and engagement in the information war are having, simply because to even look at that objectively would contradict your view that he's "not a white hat"? Are you "making excuses" for ignoring those positive impacts by pointing to what you consider proof of moral corruption?

You even go on to assert that the ONLY reason people see Musk's role positively or might consider his role a positive one (aka different to your obvious opinion and view) is "just because (he) trolls liberals occasionally on Twitter/X".

Are you unable to consider that some people might be looking at the Musk issue through a different prism to yours, one that has some value, one that might offer a different conclusion?

Again, swap Musk for "DJT" here and ask yourself, why do I see things this way, and why am I asserting that "the only reason people" would do "willing to overlook and make excuses" (which is really a derogatory characterization and has a clear negative nuance) is because (extremely superficial reason).

I'd like to challenge you to think about this for a bit. We're all anons here. We're all (well, most of us) are intent on expanding our thinking processes, of working through the fog and the fumes of the disinformation and programming we've been subjected to for decades. Well, that requires a certain amount of dispassionate reflection on HOW we ourselves think and approach what is happening.

I don't have any issue with you having a different opinion Re: Musk, but the line of reasoning and argument you make in your comment here leaves some doubt (to me, anyway) about how far you are thinking about your OWN reasons and views and possibly biases in arriving at your conclusions.

A final note:

If God was unable to work through even (very) flawed people at times, neither you, nor I, nor anyone else would be here.

Maybe Musk is a bad guy, or maybe he isn't. Maybe he's a very flawed individual who nonetheless is trying to do positive things for humanity, DESPITE his own mistakes and flaws.

And maybe your fellow anons actually have good reasons for seeing Musk from a different angle to you, as opposed only doing this because "he trolls liberals on Twitter occasionally".

Just my $0.02.