That's precisely the question. Why is there no consequence? Or is there? I've learned that if you can't file a lawsuit against an entity that has immunity, you attempt to separate the individual from the immune entity. In order to pursue a lawsuit against the individual, the identity of the individual(s) is need. Was the individual representing and acting in the trust and capacity of the agency or were they acting in the interests their own personal agenda? Does the agency approve of this individual's behavior? If this can't be achieved through FOIA and other mechanisms, then the next best tactic is to file a lawsuit against the unscrupulous practice of the attorney representing the agency. Someone must always pay for bad behavior and evil.

That's precisely the question. Why is there no consequence? Or is there? I've learned that if you can't file a lawsuit against an entity that has immunity, you attempt to separate the individual from the immune entity. In order to pursue a lawsuit against the individual, the identity of the individual(s) is need. Was the individual representing and acting in the trust and capacity of the agency or were they acting in the interests their own personal agenda? Does the agency approve of this individual's behavior? If this can't be achieved through FOIA and other mechanisms, then the next best tactic is to file a lawsuit against the unscrupulous practice of the attorney representing the agency. Someone must pay for bad behavior and evil.

That's precisely the question. Why is there no consequence? Or is there? I've learned that if you can't file a lawsuit against an entity that has immunity, you attempt to separate the individual from the immune entity. In order to pursue a lawsuit against the individual, the identity of the individual(s) is need. Was the individual representing and acting in the trust and capacity of the agency or their own agenda? Does the agency approve of this individual's behavior? If this can't be achieved through FOIA and other mechanisms, then the next best tactic is to file a lawsuit against the unscrupulous practice of the attorney representing the agency. Someone must pay for bad behavior and evil.

That's precisely the question. Why is there no consequence? Or is there? I've learned that if you can't file a lawsuit against an entity that has immunity. You separate the individual from the immune entity. In order to pursue a lawsuit against the individual, the identity of the individual(s) is need. Was the individual representing and acting in the trust and capacity of the agency or their own agenda? Does the agency approve of this individual's behavior? If this can't be achieved through FOIA and other mechanisms, then the next best tactic is to file a lawsuit against the unscrupulous practice of the attorney representing the agency. Someone must pay for bad behavior and evil.

That's precisely the question. Why is there no consequence? Or is there?