There'd be a beautifully symphonic disparity between Trump's Eagle Scout purchase being blocked by a 4473 from political prosecution and Hunter's abject, treasonous, drug-addled, felonious lifestyle getting a total pass from the law as it's administered.

And yet, both of their 2nd amendment rights were clearly violated.

Another fun precedent that could be set here: is it ok to lie to the government when it's committing an unconstitutional act, as Hunter did?

===

Hunter could be a foundation for fixing a lot of issues because he's a sort of worst case scenario, but aside from the treason no one was really hurt by what he did.

Put another way: There is no emotional component for conservatives w/respect to Hunter. Thus neither side is going to be motivated to offer a mOar-government response here.

Normally the cabal orchestrates situations so that at least one side is advocating for mOar government with an emotional charge involved. When the "Hunter" card is played, both sides diffuse and the court can do its thing.

There'd be a beautifully symphonic disparity between Trump's Eagle Scout purchase being blocked by a 4473 from political prosecution and Hunter's abject, treasonous, drug-addled, felonious lifestyle getting a total pass from the law as it's administered.

And yet, both of their 2nd amendment rights were clearly violated.

Another fun precedent that could be set here: is it ok to lie to the government when it's committing an unconstitutional act, as Hunter did?