Actually, I was just trying to understand the content and get to the correct info. I’ve seen this exact thing happen before where a Trump supporter posted a video highlighting a high end car set to a Phil Collins song (“In the Air Tonight”) that contained a lot of exciting content in it and the poster(s) kept claiming that it was a Trump campaign ad - but it wasn’t. I see this as being the very same situation.
The Crokin post specifically says this video is a Trump campaign video, but it’s NOT. Implying that President Trump formally created this as a campaign ad and authorized it is totally different than re-posting a ‘fan fiction’ type of video (which is what this definitely looks like).
Also, Crokin said that the Trump-posted “campaign video” (which it’s not) contained a multitude of various envelope recipients at the GHW Bush funeral within it, but it didn’t - it only showed Hillary.
There are several glaring inaccuracies going on with Crokin’s post and massive numbers of readers/viewers watching it will be interpreting it the wrong way on multiple levels, and then those people will also be spreading it around even more with countless more people being misled.
Here’s an example of this: https://t.me/SpyGateDown/30983
It may not make any difference to you, but it does to me. I’m not accusing anyone of bad intentions, but mis-labeling it as a Trump campaign video is definitely misleading, and so are the other inaccuracies in her post.
Actually, I was just trying to understand the content and get to the correct info. I’ve seen this exact thing happen before where a Trump supporter posted a video highlighting a high end car set to a Phil Collins song (“In the Air Tonight”) that contained a lot of exciting content in it and the poster(s) kept claiming that it was a Trump campaign ad - but it wasn’t. I see this as being the very same situation.
The Crokin post specifically says this video is a Trump campaign video, but it’s NOT. Implying that President Trump formally created this as a campaign ad and authorized it is totally different than re-posting a ‘fan fiction’ type of video (which is what this definitely looks like).
Also, Crokin said that the Trump-posted “campaign video” (which it’s not) contained a multitude of various envelope recipients at the GHW Bush funeral within it, but it didn’t - it only showed Hillary.
There are several glaring inaccuracies going on with Crokin’s post and massive numbers of readers/viewers watching it will be interpreting it the wrong way on multiple levels, and then those people will also be spreading it around even more with countless more people being misled.
It may not make any difference to you, but it does to me. I’m not accusing anyone of bad intentions, but mis-labeling it as a Trump campaign video is definitely misleading, and so are the other inaccuracies in her post.
Actually, I was just trying to understand the content and get to the correct info. I’ve seen this exact thing happen before where a Trump supporter posted a video highlighting a high end car set to a Phil Collins song (“In the Air Tonight”) that contained a lot of exciting content in it and the poster(s) kept claiming that it was a Trump campaign ad - but it wasn’t. I see this as being the very same situation.
The Crokin post specifically says this video is a Trump campaign video, but it’s NOT. Implying that President Trump formally created this as a campaign ad and authorized it is totally different than re-posting a ‘fan fiction’ type of video (which is what this definitely looks like).
It may not make any difference to you, but it does to me. I’m not accusing anyone of bad intentions, but mis-labeling it as a Trump campaign video is definitely misleading.