You’re repeating yourself. You said that a q post with the word qanon contradicts previous posts but I’m asking you how does it contradict the previous post.
I’ll tell you how it doesn’t by correcting your understanding:
In one post, Q is validating “QAnon” as being a thing and another Q post they denied “QAnon” as being a thing.
That’s false. Q specifically says in u/#q4881
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
He tells you 1) yes it is a thing and 2) this is what that thing is.
Please link the post number that contradicts what I said.
E: to use a different subject:
- unicorns don’t exist.
- a unicorn looks like a horse with a spiraled horn on his forehead.
Both statements are true. If you hear someone say they saw a unicorn, you know they’re full of shit. If the media is talking about qanon, you know they’re full of shit.
You’re repeating yourself. You said that a q post with the word qanon contradicts previous posts but I’m asking you how does it contradict the previous post.
I’ll tell you how it doesn’t by correcting your understanding:
In one post, Q is validating “QAnon” as being a thing and another Q post they denied “QAnon” as being a thing.
That’s false. Q specifically says in u/#q4881
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
He tells you 1) yes it is a thing and 2) this is what that thing is.
Please link the post number that contradicts what I said.