Under the Obama plan, the entire ME was to be destabilized either thru radical Shia factions or the Muslim Brotherhood which are primarily Sunni. The MB is heavily imbedded within the US government or leverages influence through numerous NGOs. Iran has its own influencers within the government to lobby behind the scenes. China is also there through United Front little pink efforts. Obama is a communist and is a Muslim sympathizer. Communists often align with radical Islam - it serves their purposes. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Iran is just another chess piece on the board but it has aspirations of being a major player. Obama's, and now Biden's, ME policy has been a disaster and events taking place there currently are a result. The DS has been quietly financially supporting the efforts behind the scenes as you state. A nuclear armed Iran acts as a counterbalance so nobody will be able to threaten this chess piece. NK is the same.

There are a lot of moving pieces to this picture and many players - both in front and operating behind the scenes all jockeying for position. Who really funds Iran? Yes, there is US DS involvement, but are there others? Who stands to lose if a proposed economic corridor is established from India to the EU by way of SA and Israel? China and Russia are sputtering while West Pacific nations are on the rise. India especially has potential if they can solve their infrastructure issues. Who loses? China, Russia, and Iran are looking at their own economic corridor. China is investing in a couple of proposed corridors through Belt and Road. A corridor established by more Western leaning nations threatens this plan. This is why the Abraham Accord had to be blown up - but is it? Remember, what is said publicly may not necessarily be the truth of what is really occuring behind the scenes. China's current economic position could bring all these plans to an end and without China, Russia can't stand alone. Why did Iran stir up the pot now? Iran saw the prospect of being sidelined instead of being a major player. The problem with creating loose cannons is they don't always go off on cue when being activated.

The bottom line is always power and money. Follow the money and you will usually get your answers.

Under the Obama plan, the entire ME was to be destabilized either thru radical Shia factions or the Muslim Brotherhood which are primarily Sunni. The MB is heavily imbedded within the US government or leverages influence through numerous NGOs. Iran has its own influencers within the government to lobby behind the scenes. China is also there through United Front little pink efforts. Obama is a communist and is a Muslim sympathizer. Communists often align with radical Islam - it serves their purposes. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Iran is just another chess piece on the board but it has aspirations of being a major player. Obama's, and now Biden's, ME policy has been a disaster and events taking place there currently are a result. The DS has been quietly financially supporting the efforts behind the scenes as you state. A nuclear armed Iran acts as a counterbalance so nobody will be able to threaten this chess piece. NK is the same.

There are a lot of moving pieces to this picture and many players - both in front and operating behind the scenes all jockeying for position. Who really funds Iran? Yes, there is US DS involvement, but are there others? Who stands to lose if a proposed economic corridor is established from India to the EU by way of SA and Israel? China and Russia are sputtering while West Pacific nations are on the rise. India especially has potential if they can solve their infrastructure issues. Who loses? China, Russia, and Iran are looking at their own economic corridor. China is investing in a couple of proposed corridors through Belt and Road. A corridor established by more Western leaning nations threatens this plan. This is why the Abraham Accord had to be blown up. China's current economic position could bring it all to an end and without China, Russia can't stand alone. Why did Iran stir up the pot now? Iran saw the prospect of being sidelined instead of being a major player. The problem with creating loose cannons is they don't always go off on cue when being activated.

The bottom line is always power and money. Follow the money and you will usually get your answers.

Under the Obama plan, the entire ME was to be destabilized either thru radical Shia factions or the Muslim Brotherhood which are primarily Sunni. The MB is heavily imbedded within the US government or leverages influence through numerous NGOs. Iran has its own influencers within the government to lobby behind the scenes. China is also there through United Front little pink efforts. Obama is a communist and is a Muslim sympathizer. Communists often align with radical Islam - it serves their purposes. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Iran is just another chess piece on the board but it has aspirations of being a major player. Obama's, and now Biden's, ME policy has been a disaster and events taking place there currently are a result. The DS has been quietly financially supporting the efforts behind the scenes as you state. A nuclear armed Iran acts as a counterbalance so nobody will be able to threaten this chess piece. NK is the same.

There are a lot of moving pieces to this picture and many players - both in front and operating behind the scenes all jockeying for position. Who really funds Iran? Yes, there is US DS involvement, but are there others? Who stands to loose if a proposed economic corridor is established from India to the EU by way of SA and Israel? China and Russia are sputtering while West Pacific nations are on the rise. India especially has potential if they can solve their infrastructure issues. Who loses? China, Russia, and Iran are looking at their own economic corridor. China is investing in a couple of proposed corridors through Belt and Road. A corridor established by more Western leaning nations threatens this plan. This is why the Abraham Accord had to be blown up. China's current economic position could bring it all to an end and without China, Russia can't stand alone. Why did Iran stir up the pot now? Iran saw the prospect of being sidelined instead of being a major player. The problem with creating loose cannons is they don't always go off on cue when being activated.

The bottom line is always power and money. Follow the money and you will usually get your answers.

Under the Obama plan, the entire ME was to be destabilized either thru radical Shia factions or the Muslim Brotherhood which are primarily Sunni. The MB is heavily imbedded within the US government or leverages influence through numerous NGOs. Iran has its own influencers within the government to lobby behind the scenes. China is also there through United Front little pink efforts. Obama is a communist and is a Muslim sympathizer. Communists often align with radical Islam - it serves their purposes. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Iran is just another chess piece on the board but it has aspirations of being a major player. Obama's, and now Biden's, ME policy has been a disaster and events taking place there currently are a result. The DS has been quietly financially supporting the efforts behind the scenes as you state. A nuclear armed Iran acts as a counterbalance so nobody will be able to threaten this chess piece. NK is the same.

There are a lot of moving pieces to this picture and many players - both in front and operating behind the scenes all jockeying for position. Who really funds Iran? Yes, there is US DS involvement, but are their others? Who stands to loose if a proposed economic corridor is established from India to the EU by way of SA and Israel? China and Russia are sputtering while West Pacific nations are on the rise. India especially has potential if they can solve their infrastructure issues. Who loses? China, Russia, and Iran are looking at their own economic corridor. China is investing in a couple of proposed corridors through Belt and Road. A corridor established by more Western leaning nations threatens this plan. This is why the Abraham Accord had to be blown up. China's current economic position could bring it all to an end and without China, Russia can't stand alone. Why did Iran stir up the pot now? Iran saw the prospect of being sidelined instead of being a major player. The problem with creating loose cannons is they don't always go off on cue when being activated.

The bottom line is always power and money. Follow the money and you will usually get your answers.

Under the Obama plan, the entire ME was to be destabilized either thru radical Shia factions or the Muslim Brotherhood which are primarily Sunni. The MB is heavily imbedded within the US government or leverages influence through numerous NGOs. Iran has its own influencers within the government to lobby behind the scenes. China is also there through United Front little pink efforts. Obama is a communist and is a Muslim sympathizer. Communists often align with radical Islam - it serves their purposes. Iran is just another chess piece on the board. Obama's, and now Biden's, ME policy has been a disaster and events taking place there currently are a result. The DS has been quietly financially supporting the efforts behind the scenes as you state. They want a nuclear armed Iran to act as a counterbalance so nobody will be able to threaten this chess piece. NK is the same.

There are a lot of moving pieces to this picture and many players - both in front and operating behind the scenes all jockeying for position. Who really funds Iran? Yes, there is US DS involvement, but are their others? Who stands to loose if a proposed economic corridor is established from India to the EU by way of SA and Israel? China and Russia are sputtering while West Pacific nations are on the rise. India especially has potential if they can solve their infrastructure issues. Who loses? China, Russia, and Iran are looking at their own economic corridor and China is investing in a couple of proposed corridors through Belt and Road. A corridor established by more Western leaning nations threatens this plan. China's current economic position could bring it all to an end and without China Russia can't stand alone. Why did Iran stir up the pot now? Iran saw the prospect of being sidelined instead of being a major player. The bottom line is always power and money. Follow the money and you will usually get your answers.