Snippets from #4771
QAnon leaders look to rebrand after tech crack downs
The shift in tactics comes the same week as Twitter released new data stating that their ban on QAnon-related accounts was severely limiting the reach of the conspiracy theory.
OVER THE TARGET.
Sooooo much linguistic manipulation in these few words.
QAnon leaders look to rebrand after tech crack downs
Leaders? What leaders? Amazing how the MSM was able to locate Q's 'leaders' when I haven't seen hide nor hair of any leaders in my (admittedly beginner level) research thus far. Sort of like their convenient anonymous sources.
The [Q's] shift in tactics...
Are they attempting to say the Q movement is weak and will bend to their propaganda? I haven't seen that. I have seen Q suggesting to spread the message without labeling it as coming from Q drops, thus allowing others to analyze the info without being influenced by the negative spin the MSM is laying down. That seems smart, not weak.
...Twitter released new data...
I don't think it's outrageous to say we should treat any data released by Twitter with high suspicion.
... their [Twitter's] ban on QAnon-related accounts...
They tout their censorship as a good thing. It certainly speaks to Twitter's 'integrity' when you look to see what they censor/remove and what they let stay up.
...severely limiting the reach of the [Q's] conspiracy theory.
Their message is certainly consistent. There is a highly coordinated effort between social media and the MSM to link QAnon with the nebulous & negative concept of 'conspiracy theory'.
OVER THE TARGET.
I have said this before, but it's worth repeating. I'm not big on hidden meanings, conspiracy theories, etc. But I have definitely noticed a DIRECT CONNECTION between how loudly the deep state/social media/MSM sources squawk and how much they want to keep something hidden or buried.
This is my personal meter for how much to seriously consider Q's messages. And since the smear campaign against QAnon has ramped up so spectacularly, I have to conclude that Q most likely really is OVER THE TARGET.
Snippets from #4771
QAnon leaders look to rebrand after tech crack downs
The shift in tactics comes the same week as Twitter released new data stating that their ban on QAnon-related accounts was severely limiting the reach of the conspiracy theory.
OVER THE TARGET.
Sooooo much linguistic manipulation in these few words.
QAnon leaders look to rebrand after tech crack downs
Leaders? What leaders? Amazing how the MSM was able to locate Q's 'leaders' when I haven't seen hide nor hair of any leaders in my (admittedly beginner level) research thus far. Sort of like their convenient anonymous sources.
The [Q's] shift in tactics...
Are they are attempting to say the Q movement is weak and will bend to their propaganda? I haven't seen that. I have seen Q suggesting to spread the message without labeling it as coming from Q drops, thus allowing others to analyze the info without being influenced by the negative spin the MSM is laying down. That seems smart, not weak.
...Twitter released new data...
I don't think it's outrageous to say we should treat any data released by Twitter with high suspicion.
... their [Twitter's] ban on QAnon-related accounts...
They tout their censorship as a good thing. It certainly speaks to Twitter's 'integrity' when you look to see what they censor/remove and what they let stay up.
...severely limiting the reach of the [Q's] conspiracy theory.
Their message is certainly consistent. There is a highly coordinated effort between social media and the MSM to link QAnon with the nebulous & negative concept of 'conspiracy theory'.
OVER THE TARGET.
I have said this before, but it's worth repeating. I'm not big on hidden meanings, conspiracy theories, etc. But I have definitely noticed a DIRECT CONNECTION between how loudly the deep state/social media/MSM sources squawk and how much they want to keep something hidden or buried.
This is my personal meter for how much to seriously consider Q's messages. And since the smear campaign against QAnon has ramped up so spectacularly, I have to conclude that Q most likely really is OVER THE TARGET.