Im not ignoring it. Wars of agression always fail in the end, they are always unsustainable without the hearts and minds of the people invaded. Theres never been an army since the Mongols with the capability to overrun Russiaand that was premedieval. Theres a reason why there is a truism that you never fight a land war in asia.
The fact remains that France was able to conquer all of Europe and most of North Africa and until the Russian winter destroyed Napoleons army most of European Russia. That isnt a measure of a cowardly army. And neither is holding fast during WW1. Facts are hard, gaslighting is easy.
Look up the Battle of Bir Hacheim in the Libyan desert during WW2 and tell me the French are cowards. They single handedly held off the entirety of Rommels offensive force allowing the British to reorganize at El Alamein.
Or read into the Fenchs efforts during the Revolution. We Americans focus on events on this continent but that was truly the first world war. If it wasnt the for the French battling the British around the world this country wouldnt exist.
SMH Americans lack of knowledge of world history is one of our problems.
Im not ignoring it. Wars of agression always fail in the end, they are always unsustainable without the hearts and minds of the people invaded. Theres never been an army since the Mongols with the capability to overrun Russiaand that was premedieval. Theres a reason why there is a truism that you never fight a land war in asia.
The fact remains that France was able to conquer all of Europe and most of North Africa and until the Russian winter destroyed Napoleons army most of European Russia. That isnt a measure of a cowardly army. And neither is holding fast during WW1. Facts are hard, gaslighting is easy.
Look up the Battle of Bir Hacheim in the Libyan desert during WW2 and tell me the French are cowards. They single handedly held off the entirety of Rommels offencive force allowing the British to reorganize at El Alamein.
Im not ignoring it. Wars of agression always fail in the end, they are always unsustainable without the hearts and minds of the people invaded. Theres never been an army since the Mongols with the capability to overrun Russiaand that was premedieval. Theres a reason why there is a truism that you never fight a land war in asia.
The fact remains that France was able to conquer all of Europe and most of North Africa and until the Russian winter destroyed Napoleons army most of European Russia. That isnt a measure of a cowardly army. And neither is holding fast during WW1. Facts are hard, gaslighting is easy.
Look up the Battle of Bir Hacheim in the Libyan desert during WW@ and tell me the French are cowards. They single handedly held off the entirety of Rommels offencive force allowing the British to reorganize at El Alamein.
Im not ignoring it. Wars of agression always fail in the end, they are always unsustainable without the hearts and minds of the people invaded. Theres never been an army since the Mongols with the capability to overrun Russiaand that was premedieval. Theres a reason why there is a truism that you never fight a land war in asia.
The fact remains that France was able to conquer all of Europe and most of North Africa and until the Russian winter destroyed Napoleons army most of European Russia. That isnt a measure of a cowardly army. And neither is holding fast during WW1. Facts are hard, gaslighting is easy.