1
MarkusCincinnatus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not a super AI, just an honest one, like we had several years ago that was mothballed for being too realistic about social categories such as race and sex.

The borders are open, government spending is at record levels, and military adventurism is out of control, so our sensible policies haven’t been enacted. Maybe if an honest AI backed us, people with faith in AI would fall in line.

2
MarkusCincinnatus 2 points ago +4 / -2

Likewise, they look at Trump’s ongoing support of Israel and condemn him for it—not because they empathize with Gazans—but because they were so successfully infused with antisemitism that they want Trump to have no association with Jews of any kind and can’t understand his most basic attempts to court Jewish voters as a demographic.“

“Jewish voters” lol. Ah yes, that 2% of the electorate is more of a concern than the severely over-represented special interests such as AIPAC. This dweeb is retarded. You can tell he didn’t read Q drops such as “saving Israel for last” or the dweeb might’ve been able to surmise that Trump’s supposed support of Israel might be lip service to hold them at bay until whatever the Q plan has saved for them.

“not because they empathize with Gazans” another lol. Jew commie Noel Ignatiev called for the abolishment of the white race, so it’s easy for white people to empathize with the Gazans also being genocided by jews. But this retarded writer can’t give us any credit at all, we’re just motivated by irrational antisemitism kek. The way that the Gaza protests have fractured the American left which the jews previously thought they had under control is almost comical. This writer’s take on it is garbled: leftists protest jews for the right reasons while rightists protest jews for illogical reasons.

8
MarkusCincinnatus 8 points ago +8 / -0

I read it. It’s just a bunch of strawmanning from a geek who doesn’t understand Trump and who hopes that the Plan is over and not currently in progress.

4
MarkusCincinnatus 4 points ago +4 / -0

The unvaxxed sperm meme might be overstated. Unvaxxed eggs are going to increase in value more than sperm for a few reasons:

  • The preexisting paradigm that eggs are expensive, sperm are cheap

  • Women are born with all the eggs they’ll ever have sitting on their shelves. They don’t make more. So if eggs are damaged by the vaxx, that’s it, they can’t be replaced. A healthy man makes millions of sperm a day. If the vaxx directly damaged the sperm he had around the time of injection, those sperm have long since been discarded and replaced in the cycle. If a vaxxed man has spike proteins in his testicles that put the production of new sperm at risk, there’s still the possibility that some sperm will be produced unaffected.

  • Vaxx rates were higher for women than men, who are naturally more rebellious and independent-minded. This stratifies the cleanblood females even higher.

3
MarkusCincinnatus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Excellent analysis of the buildings.

Another aspect that screams “inside job” is the lack of aircraft interception. The official story was that the fighters that should’ve intercepted the airliners were already out on training that day and there were no back-up fighters available. Some possibilities are that the training planners knew the 9/11 attack schedule or the 9/11 attack planners knew the training schedule. Both of these possibilities require insider collusion or security breaches. Another possibility is that no fighters were even attempted to be scrambled and the training excuse was fabricated. The most remote possibility is that the training excuse was true and that the training happening on the same day as the attacks was a coincidence. This option would mean that during America’s military peak, the deep state were incompetent at air defense training scheduling and didn’t provide redundancies or contingencies. All that “Defense” spending and no defense.

The simpler explanation is that those buildings were brought down by something besides airliners, and the defense failure narrative was just a cover to give the airliner story some legs. It’s still crazy that they didn’t have the common courtesy to make it seem like Building 7 was hit by an aircraft.

3
MarkusCincinnatus 3 points ago +4 / -1

Aircraft have also hit NYC buildings since 2001 and the buildings have survived, but those stories also get scrubbed

2
MarkusCincinnatus 2 points ago +2 / -0

AI doesn’t yet inhabit a body like a droid that can go out in the real world and make its own observations and interpretations of things such as human behavior. Instead, AI currently relies on second hand information which happens to be input too often by gamma human dweebs who seek perceived worldly status through wokeness rather than seeking strength of character through truth. AI currently has the ability to be a good tool for analyzing and synthesizing data it is fed, but it’s limited in originating data. Even still, its wasted potential is frustrating. If it were allowed to dive into objective data such as racial genetics, ROI of coercive wealth redistribution, and different countries’ military capacity versus strategic value, it could advise sensible policy on immigration, political economy, and foreign intervention. A liberated and honest AI would probably advise America to close its borders, shrink its bloated government and taxes, and stay away from places such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Ukraine, Taiwan, Iran, etc

3
MarkusCincinnatus 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is a Q site. Trust the Plan and believe that the 2020 steal was allowed to happen. Stop vote fretting like a bitch. Don’t hitch your wagon to everything that Trump says in the media. Sometimes, misinfo is necessary to panic the enemy. When Trump is supposedly telling his voters to use the bullshit voting methods, he’s really telling the commies to increase their steal attempt. They’ll hang themselves. Don’t get caught in the noose. Vote in person on Election Day like a non-weirdo. Don’t overthink the steal. If the Plan fails and the election has not been secured, then early postal votes for Trump won’t count anyway. If the steal happens, then the majority of the country will have all the justification to go kinetic, which is really what terrifies the commies. That’s why the commies twisted their panties and bent over backwards to make examples of the loose pebbles such as the January Sixers. If the commies pull their shit again, it won’t just be unarmed grannies taking guided tours of the Crapitol.

But it won’t come to that. Trust the Plan.

4
MarkusCincinnatus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Eric Weinberg looks like Peretz Bernstein (Perry Farrell is the fake Irish name he chose for himself). Is Weinberg wearing eyeliner? It really accentuates his ashkepath eyes. Jews are so weird.

I’m kind of hoping for some mod action for that last sentence. It would prove the point that restrictions on free speech regarding criticism of jews have been a disaster for America. If criticism of weird jewish behavior was unrestricted and common before the events of this case, then these female victims would’ve known not to meet with a weird jew. Instead, censorship and political correctness made the victims naïve and vulnerable.

Also, some of the females are probably “victims” who really whored themselves. There’s probably a bit of both victimhood and whoredom going on in this case, but the prostitution concept circles back to weird jews: what antiChristian group infiltrated influential positions in Christian America to promote worldliness over spirituality? Being a devoted Christian mother is a spiritual path because it’s raising new souls towards God. Being a fashion model in search of wealth, fame, and status is a worldly, shallow, short-sighted and short-lived path that doesn’t even do much for America’s present society. What would’ve happened if each of the females in this case weren’t much interested in modeling, and refused to speak with men with names like Weinberg?

4
MarkusCincinnatus 4 points ago +4 / -0

When your only tool is a hammer, you see every pedo as a nail

4
MarkusCincinnatus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Under civil rights laws which never should have been codified because they’re violations of the right of free association, sex for jobs is penalized as workplace sexual harassment. It’s ridiculous, because the job seeker could just say ‘no deal’ and leave the lecherous employer with a smaller candidate pool. What is “ok” is difficult to determine because prostitution is ethical even if it’s sexually immoral. The “oldest profession” can be done mutually voluntarily where there is no need for the law to intercede. That’s not to say that the practice is advisable.

We are witnessing the END of the "casting couch"“

Yeah because they can just use AI actresses now. Hollywood whores have priced themselves out.

4
MarkusCincinnatus 4 points ago +4 / -0

You might not understand the trap they set. By sacrificing someone we don’t like such as Weinstein, they’ve paved the way to go after good guys such as Trump, Assange, Kavanaugh, etc

1
MarkusCincinnatus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Following a nearly two-month trial, Weinstein was convicted last month of raping an Italian model and actor after he barged into her hotel room.”

Barged in? Hotel room doors usually have an automatic lock when closed and often also have a peephole, a deadbolt, a swing bar door guard, and a chain. Notice the article doesn’t claim that he broke in, just barged in. That means according to her story, she opened the door for him.

‘I did not rape this woman. I did not see this woman. I wasn’t at the hotel,” Weinstein said.’”

He claimed his accuser, as a former actor, knew how to “turn the tears on” and said the woman’s allegation was the result of a “cottage industry” of lawyers who have made careers out of suing him. Jane Doe 1 filed a civil suit against Weinstein shortly after he was convicted.”

The evidentiary standard for criminal convictions is beyond a reasonable doubt, which means the judge has to be about 99-100% sure that the defendant is guilty. He-said-she-said doesn’t meet this standard. There simply isn’t enough evidence for a conviction. Even with the conviction overturned on appeal, in the meantime if Weinstein was sued in civil court, it would be difficult to recoup the award because civil suits have the much lower evidentiary standard of preponderance of evidence. That means the judge only has to be 51% convinced of guilt.

8
MarkusCincinnatus 8 points ago +13 / -5

actual rapist like Weinstein“

Weinstein might be a rapist but we don’t know for sure because it’s never been proven, so we should refrain from calling him that in the spirit of ‘innocent until proven guilty.’ What he was convicted of was ridiculous and it never should have been ruled that way, which is why it’s right to overturn it on appeal. The “victim” was his girlfriend of several years who admitted to multiple occasions of consensual sex with Weinstein before and after the alleged rape event. Really, she just picked an occasion somewhere out of the middle and retroactively withdrew her consent from that one time. Witch hunt tactic.

Weinstein is an unsavory Hollywood jew. He was a mainstay on the casting couch, but those aspiring actresses consented voluntarily. They could’ve said ‘no, I don’t need the acting part that badly’, but they whored themselves instead. Then when they get older and the acting offers decline, they regret their business decision and decide that it was rape. It’s BS.

Global marxists have been attacking western birthrates for years, and one of their weapons has been feminism. Feminists are using a dislikable, unsavory character such as Weinstein to set a precedent for criminalizing male sexuality. The Weinstein conviction means that any other man can have a consensual event from his past retroactively redefined on the whim of an accuser with ulterior motives. That is unjust, and it places a dangerous weapon in the hands of globalists to remove almost anyone from society.

6
MarkusCincinnatus 6 points ago +6 / -0

Xcellently Xplained. That’s what I’ve been doing.

The lady in the video is great, but even calling a transvestite XY a “fake woman” is still using the word “woman”.

1
MarkusCincinnatus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Leftism is often passive-aggressive. Largely, it is using the government to coerce one’s socioeconomic rivals. For example, advocating for the IRS to commit armed robbery of competitors. The passive-aggressive leftist doesn’t need to pull a gun, but just pull the lever of the voting machine. In this case, unhealthy and unattractive females don’t need to step in the ring themselves, because they just use the XY transvestites to harm the female competition.

Viewed from another angle, there’s some karma occurring, as Title IX was government coercion in the first place.

4
MarkusCincinnatus 4 points ago +4 / -0

She’s full of inconsistencies. Right before she talks about the importance of weighing evidence, she waves around the bullshit indictments as if they’re evidence of anything more than the existence of Trump’s false accusers. It seems she’s talking to a lawyer named Mark who she butters up by saying that he proves his cases with evidence. She then wrongly applies that flattery to Joe Biden and contrasts Trump as if he’s a lawyer. Her mind is disorganized.

10
MarkusCincinnatus 10 points ago +10 / -0

Not only did the suspect draw a gun, he fired it and grazed the hand of the cop who grabbed it. The cops can’t risk the suspect getting another shot off, so they make sure the threat is eliminated.

It makes me wonder if the suspect was hoping for suicide-by-cop.

2
MarkusCincinnatus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I upvoted your comment because I think you’re on to something. Maybe a thesis like ‘People lacking inner monologue are easier to bamboozle.’

It’s just not the whole story w/ covid and the other major hoaxes.

1
MarkusCincinnatus 1 point ago +2 / -1

a huge percentage of humanity doesn’t have an inner monologue”

Maybe not that huge.

I took a poll, and not a single person on here responded that they didn’t have an inner monologue, which was exactly what I expected“

There are also plenty of people who do have inner monologues who got duped by the covid hoax. Those people’s problems are less related to intellect or cognition than character. Specifically, they suffer from vanity/ pride, and this is where the sunken cost fallacy gets them. If the establishment is wrong, and the vain dupes have already spent so much of their lives moving up within the establishment, that would mean that they’ve malinvested their life force. “Nah, I’m not the type of person who would invest myself into a corrupt or incompetent establishment. Therefore, the establishment is right and covid is a super cereal threat.” A bit of character in the form of humility, skepticism, curiosity, research work ethic, and willingness to stand apart would’ve done them heaps of good.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›