Yeah very doable but I think we may want to prepare for the possibility that Trump is not on the ballot as an R and we have to do write-ins.
TBH it makes so much sense that I'd be shocked if that wasn't the outcome.
Firstly, it's important for conservatives to understand that the Republican party is filled with traitors. Not just in the sense of policy, but genuine McCain grade treason is widespread. White hats need people to understand that voting is not enough, and that we need to take the reigns of our government rather than deferring.
Secondly, voting machine fraud is still out there. Hand counts are the only way to ensure a fair vote. Forcing all Trump voters to do a write-in makes that easy to accomplish.
The RNC kicking Trump off the ballot accomplishes both these tasks.
Good Change = GC
GC = FBI General Counsel
Maybe wants us to read up on the history of the General Counsel position? It's pretty juicy:
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/20/fbi-discrimination-case-00087650
And looks like some of what's going on is being covered up as a sexual harassment/discrimination sort of thing, rather than the more likely explanation of white hat vs. cabal turf war.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_E._Caproni
Looks like a man.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_L._Wainstein
Preceded them and was one of the people who stated Trump was unfit to serve.
Larry R. Parkinson has no info.
Howard Shapiro -- ok this one is interesting. He tipped off the Clintons about an investigation into them and was subsequently fired.
https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/05/21/email/shapiro.fbi/
His quote in leaving was also fascinating, why did he emphasize the women in the FBI first?
"It was a privilege to have worked with Louie Freeh and the fine women and men of the FBI."
Richard J. Salgado -- was interim, is it this guy? https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/10-31-17%20Salgado%20Testimony.pdf
Thomas Collingwood -- not seeing anything interesting, seems to have left after 9/11
Beyond that things start to get blurry to the point that the AI might be making people up...
Carlisle Hubbard?
Herman Phleger?
I've been following the DNC machinations in response to the timing of their convention relative to Ohio election law and basically from an event planning standpoint it's not possible to move the convention. People have hotels & flights book, catering, etc.
What they ended up doing was scheduling an online meeting in advance to nominate their POTUS candidate. So something like that could be done.
It's a pander op.
There was probably a legitimate bill brought forward that the cabal needed to railroad so they initiated this pander op. Look for recently sidelined LA bills and you'll likely see what they really feared.
If you look to the precedent Russia set in Chechnya I think you can feel good about the prospects of Russia/Ukraine relations long term, though it'll be grim in the early days.
Watching footage of the cities after combat--there is nothing left...
Not sure why folks are cheering here unless they expect the state to use their tax dollars to take this all the way to the Supreme Court for a new precedent...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_v._Graham
The Court concluded that because "requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments in public school rooms has no secular legislative purpose," it is unconstitutional.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemon_v._Kurtzman
The three parts of the Lemon test are Purpose, Effect, and Entanglement. Has LA satisfied those?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCreary_County_v._American_Civil_Liberties_Union
What is the primary purpose here? What nuance is the bill adding that it won't be shot down legally? Does this legislation give you good "feels" and make you angry when you see it questioned? If so it's likely that you're being emotionally manipulated away from things the cabal doesn't want you focused on.
Why is LA pursuing this instead of other low hanging fruit like pride or BLM flags in public spaces?
Why are LA conservatives pursuing legislation that they know will give their constituents "the feels" but will almost certainly be shut down?
Fund raising? Division? Running out the clock on real legislation? What should they have been working on that they brought this up instead?
Think. Liberals aren't the only demographic that can be emotionally manipulated.
Washington Post has a shockingly good, old school HTML breakdown of the case.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/pjones/keystories.htm
yawn