1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

I.e. YOLO your HODL up by 50%.

MOOOOOOOOOOON

If the market works how they say it works, you don’t have 80% buy 20% sell and the price drops by half.

RIGGED

VOTE COUNTS DON’T GO DOWN OR VERTICALLY UP

RIGGED RIGGED RIGGED RIGGERS GONNA RIG

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I’m not either. Kinda refuse to claim a “denomination”, just ideas.

The days they did do just seem to have been a practice. I don’t know how they go t to that, but it strikes me as a good one.

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://biblereasons.com/reasons-for-fasting/

Not mentioned is that the commandment for the Day of Atonement is to fast. “Afflict yourselves”.

Leviticus 23:26-32.

To be clear, I am a Christian who believes most of the Old Testament should still be followed (some parts can’t be), and that while following it does not earn salvation (that’s done through grace), not following it sure seems to eventually lead to condemnation (per looking around at anything right now).

Early Christians fasted because the Old Testament commands us to fast, and they followed what it said, including Jesus himself, who was called by John, “the Logos made flesh”. The Logic of creation itself.

https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/69513/when-did-the-early-church-begin-and-end-their-twice-weekly-fasts#69519

As with the drops of this board, don’t take my word for it but confirm things for yourself by researching the scriptures and other primary sources.

Edit: also it was wednesdays and fridays but that was just what they did, not proscribed.

5
AmateurExpert 5 points ago +5 / -0

Some might call the annual fast.. “Day of Atonement”.

Just throwing it out there.

Biblically proscribed by God himself, who is just, righteous, and all scripture is breathed by inspiration of God, and profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, and instruction in righteousness.

Life in abundance.

Christians all used to fast twice a week - Tuesdays and Thursdays, I believe it was.

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah “don’t trust AA” seems like the way to go

Doesn’t mean I’m right but lots of signs on that one.

3
AmateurExpert 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol gotta love the downvotes lately. KEEP CRYING, EVIL ONES.

Kinda nice to see that one in a way though. I wasn’t 100% positive I wasn’t going too far on some comments or something, and I may have yet done so, but they’re downvoting prayer groups.

Somebody is obviously just mad about truth and righteousness at that point.

Downdoot armor on!

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, so how do you DRS, stepwise, if the GME is in an IRA?

It sounds like it requires setting up a holding corporation, but the specifics aren’t clear. That’s not exactly the sort of thing that your everyday crayon eating ape does.

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish search worked within posts too, rather than just in topics, but I found it:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1W5hXnU/ufo-seen-over-nyc/

I don’t have an argument for why I think this, and the reasons aren’t coming to mind at the moment. Just had a major issue, little bit rattled. It may come to me later.

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yes but the million dollar question is are AMC buys retarded or yolo?

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Common law isn’t the overwhelming set of case law they make it out to be. It’s much more simple. Case law is involved, and in a court setting having some idea of it would be required, but it need not be known beforehand.

You might check this out, it’s British but if it works for them it should work for us, as we have more protections and empowerment than they do.

https://www.commonlawconstitution.org/resources

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Common law isn’t legalese. Anyone can learn it with some effort.

Legalese legalese is a bit more like software development. Common law is more founded on calling things by their proper names and learning some principles and court mechanics.

Having examples doesn’t hurt.

5
AmateurExpert 5 points ago +5 / -0

I wish I’d bought Bitcoin at $2.15, yet here we are.

3
AmateurExpert 3 points ago +3 / -0

You don’t own downloaded switch games.

Nintendo has the legal right to turn them off.

Just a heads up.

13
AmateurExpert 13 points ago +13 / -0

Right is wrong. Health is sickness. War is peace. Taxation is civil. Poison is medicine. Men are women.

FJB.

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

All’s I know is that Martin Geddes has been making headway in the UK, and they’re worse off than we are. (His cases are all over his substack)

They do have rules in their system that for some reason or another they do appear to be bound to follow. It just has to be done correctly, so they don’t file valid charges against the action itself, and one has to be ready for counterattacks when one does it.

Ephesians 6:16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.

Does “fiery darts” refer to tortious barbs, among other things? Is lawfare new? Were the men accusing the woman to be stoned to death accusing her to avoid being stoned themselves over their mutual guilt? The dead tell no tales.

If you want a book, I’ve found one, but it’s quite large.

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not sure what you’re getting at with all that comment, other than gray being hard to read and no source provided, but I agree on the source. Will take a look at adding it.

4
AmateurExpert 4 points ago +4 / -0

Have we looked into filing lawsuits against them yet?

To be clear, I haven’t done any digging on it in a month myself.

view more: Next ›