1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just making sure people are aware the image is AI Generated. Nothing against the content though just making sure no one mistakenly spreads it as real.

0
NOT_ADMIN 0 points ago +1 / -1

Truth is always the best in these situations

21
NOT_ADMIN 21 points ago +21 / -0

look at the other guys feet, whats going on here

2
NOT_ADMIN 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is normal, The jury doesn't need to specify the exact crime generally. They just need to agree that a crime of the same category happened.

12
NOT_ADMIN 12 points ago +12 / -0
  • Why have I not heard of this fruit the article asks. I have. Its a common fruit to consume in Mexico and Vietnam/Taiwan.
  • does this fruit actual kill cancer cells? I don't know.
  • interestingly though, Mexico, Vietnam and Taiwan are not high in cancer dispite agent orange in vietnam. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_cancer_rate
1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is a difference between doing the science, and taking things at face value ("trusting the science") in fact, "trusting the science" is closer to biden replacement theory than not. No forensics, no real data points, just fantastical assumptions based on images - generally decades apart. Any criticism against the trendy assumption gets down voted, any real evidence which goes against the trendy assumption is ignored.

0
NOT_ADMIN 0 points ago +1 / -1

I have conducted a thorough evaluation of the claims regarding the identity of the individual in question and have found no conclusive forensic evidence to support the notion that they are not the same person as in the 1980s. On the contrary, there is compelling forensic evidence to suggest that they are indeed the same individual. Thus, unless there is verifiable forensic evidence to the contrary, any claims suggesting otherwise are purely speculative and not grounded in reality. In the realm of this particular subject, such assertions can be likened to baseless conjecture akin to beliefs held by flat earthers, lacking substantial evidence.

-11
NOT_ADMIN -11 points ago +3 / -14

Same person. Replacement Theory is just as dumb as flat earth

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is actual a historical rational as to why they are the authority on demonic possession and exorcism

5
NOT_ADMIN 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's funny, but feels forced, like a deep stater pandering

2
NOT_ADMIN 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you not find it odd that the police are investigating what potentially may be themselves? Also it was within the headquarters. Meaning there has to be a recording.

15
NOT_ADMIN 15 points ago +15 / -0

Where is an offical government link to the source documents? Or at least some reputable source that we can have some level of confidence that it's real and not manipulated.

view more: Next ›