6
TSearch 6 points ago +6 / -0

I agree. This isn’t about setting a precedent to try DS operators in Civilian Courts, it’s about making it clear the civilian court system is not functioning. That was the purpose of the two Durham prosecutions as well.

If and when these people face justice it will be in front of a military tribunal. It may never be made public, but there will need to be some explanation for their absence from public life.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even though I think you’re right, it still saddens me to see how deeply corrupted our country and some of our fellow citizens have become. I guess we aren’t quite down to the 4% to 6% who can’t be saved, but we have to be close.

I find myself thinking about post 3728 and believe the fact President Trump continues fighting this fight and risk his fortune and freedom, is and will continue to open people eyes.

u/#q3728

13
TSearch 13 points ago +13 / -0

Thank you for this succinct explanation. Here’s my question:

An NDA is a legal agreement. NDA’s are a common practice in business and politics. NDA’s are legal. So where is the unlawful means here?

NDA’s are a legal document; therefore, a legal expense.

Legal expenses are tax deductible.

The FEC found no grounds to “charge” or punish President Trump for this matter, nor did the DOJ. So how can this be perceived as violating a federal law?

1
TSearch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Either way you look at it, someone is floating a trial balloon. It doesn’t make a lot of sense that the DS is floating this as Putin’s idea. But, maybe they’re smarter than I think.

4
TSearch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Putin is a smart operator. He knows Zelensky’s handlers will likely say no. Then, every additional inch of territory Russia claims from that point forward will be the their fault. And, we can’t dismiss the possibility this is pretending to be weak to tempt the west into sending even more unfortunate Ukrainian men to be slaughtered.

13
TSearch 13 points ago +14 / -1

If my memory is correct the Dems, at different times, held Bill Barr, Wilbur Ross, Dan Scavino, and Mark Meadows in contempt of Congress. The DOJ refused to indict them and enforce the Congressional Contempt charges. The Dems, to my memory, did not even suggest arresting them and holding them.

This is a scenario where I think Kash is suggesting ineffective tactics. Forcing a Constitutional crisis where SCOTUS may likely rule against Congress and in favor for f the Executive Branch would help the Dems. It is far better to try this in the Court of Public Opinion where people clearly see the double standard.

If SCOTUS cites a technicality that favors the Biden Administration it would undermine the argument we have a two-tiered Justice System.

This is definitely a case where optics wins the day.

2
TSearch 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you read through the drops, NCSWIC, is often in response to cabal moves and countermoves. It appears post 2494 was the first time it was used and that post drives home the idea we will take our government back.

4
TSearch 4 points ago +4 / -0

The only hope for the Ukrainian people is that President Trump is re-elected.

If this war continues to grind on Ukraine will, in many ways, cease to exist. A generation of Ukrainian men have been sacrificed by the NWO. Russians will be sent to rebuild the country and 10 to 15 years from now Ukraine will be inhabited by an ethnic Russian majority.

1
TSearch 1 point ago +1 / -0

My observation would be dismissed by lefties as anecdotal, but having encountered this multiple times, I believe it is valid. Over the last 20 years I have lost count of the young women who regretted putting off having children. Some delayed the decision based on their career goals and some on the belief they hadn’t found the right guy.

And, to be fair, I’ve also known more than a few guys who claimed to be avowed bachelors until they started closing in on their 40th birthday. Then, suddenly, they started taking stock of their life and realizing what was missing.

I think what the left fears is human nature, human instinct. Absent the leftist social engineering pressures people will instinctively revert back to earlier social models. They will marry earlier and have children earlier. And, these two things will result in them becoming conservative earlier.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think we all spend way too much time trying to figure out why these people say the things they do. And, we lose sight of the fact that outside the Anon community most people couldn’t care less about Halper-Hayes and Flynn.

I just think it’s a waste of precious time hanging on what every role player is saying. Watching President Trump plow through all this lawfare reassures me that Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming. I can wait for the final credits to roll to sort the role players out.

31
TSearch 31 points ago +34 / -3

I’m at a point where I don’t care about what she is saying or what General Flynn is saying. Neither one of them are operating inside President Trump’s inner circle. They both strike me as people trying hard to stay relevant in a Post Trump/Q reality.

That doesn’t make them necessarily good or bad, just irrelevant.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +5 / -2

I might be way off base, but I think the answer to this riddle of saving Israel for last is biblical. I don’t know what the answer is exactly, I just think it is somehow based on the Israel God intended versus the Israel of today. But, there will always be an Israel.

4
TSearch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks! I have a cold frame where I managed to keep a mix of greens, including spinach, growing through the winter. This sounds like the perfect recipe for what will probably be the final harvest before they all bolt and start flowering.

4
TSearch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sounds delicious. I’m curious when you say lard because I know in French it means something similar to American bacon. And, for us it means a cooking fat rendered from pork, I think the French word for that is saindoux.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Always think narrative. It’s not what RFK Jr. will actually do, it’s what the DS and the mockingbirds want us to believe. They want to create the narrative that RFK Jr. hurt President Trump more than Biden to make the 2024 rig plausible.

4
TSearch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can someone explain to me how a bill that tries to nationalize abortion would be constitutional? The Dems mantra is they will codify Roe. If Roe was repugnant to the constitution, wouldn’t a codification be equally repugnant?

6
TSearch 6 points ago +6 / -0

The underlying pretense in this article is that elections are not rigged; therefore, the reason someone gets elected is totally dependent on them as a candidate.

The narrative being set here is that even President Trump knows Kari Lake can’t win, so if they successfully rig Arizona again, normies accept the result. The other part of the narrative is her losing candidacy will be the reason President Trump narrowly loses Arizona as well.

Additionally, as always, the DS is trying to create division within MAGA.

NCSWIC

1
TSearch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have one problem with this poll, if taken at face value, 39% is still a long way from getting to only 4% to 6% being lost forever. Hopefully this poll is as skewed as the 2020 poll that said Biden would win Wisconsin by 17 percent.

6
TSearch 6 points ago +7 / -1

Your post caused me to have a curious thought. Is RFK Jr. really just controlled opposition on the topic of vaccines? Is he there to give people the illusion that someone on the left is fighting for them, yet, all the while the number of mandatory vaccinations and vaccines in total continue to increase?

I’m curious how much money he’s raised off his vaccine opposition? And, how often he’s actually won any kind of victory over a vaccine mandate or manufacturer?

15
TSearch 15 points ago +15 / -0

Thanks for posting this, it’s encouraging to know there is a generation coming up who still appreciates this beautiful country.

view more: Next ›