my intended premise was that the current campaign of bioweapon-engineered virus and mRNA injections is not remotely "eugenics" as was suggested; it's demonic levels of evil intended to kill, control, and genetically destroy survivors.
Then leading with the patently false statement "technically, eugenics is a biological improvement by selecting for better attributes like we do with agriculture and animals" is probably not the right approach. Yeah - technically, but the "technically" drops the important context that is the rest of the definition of the word.
I'm against arguments starting with a flawed premise and going from there.
my intended premise was that the current campaign of bioweapon-engineered virus and mRNA injections is not remotely "eugenics" as was suggested; it's demonic levels of evil intended to kill, control, and genetically destroy survivors.
Then leading with the patently false statement "technically, eugenics is a biological improvement by selecting for better attributes like we do with agriculture and animals" is probably not the right approach. Yeah - technically, but the "technically" drops the important context that is the rest of the definition of the word.