Discernment is the key. I just don't think Snopes would have confirmed something derogatory to the power elites unless there was absolutely no way to do it. Pictures aren't word salads. If they are credited to someone and in the public domain in real time Snopes doesn't have much to work with.
Yeah looking at it the first time I thought it was photoshopped also.... I reverse image search and everything I saw makes me think it's real. I even tried cutting them out and searching, nothing pops up.
Looks shopped to me. They aren't looking at him they are looking off to his left.
Wow, and thanks. Ever skeptical, I stand corrected.
This is the perfect GA interaction. Assertion-> counter->more sauce->admittance of error-> gracious reply
Glad you're here, but please don't be one of "those" that only believes something is true if Snopes "confirms" it. Unplug from the matrix
Discernment is the key. I just don't think Snopes would have confirmed something derogatory to the power elites unless there was absolutely no way to do it. Pictures aren't word salads. If they are credited to someone and in the public domain in real time Snopes doesn't have much to work with.
If anything, that would give me reason to doubt it, lol.
Snopes is no arbiter of truth...not one bit.
That proves it's shopped for me.
A fact check? C'mon, man.
Yeah looking at it the first time I thought it was photoshopped also.... I reverse image search and everything I saw makes me think it's real. I even tried cutting them out and searching, nothing pops up.
It’s not.