They falsely represented the research as being done by the presenter. They spliced in images from an unrelated study about a meth addict right-handed woman's brainscan.
Here's the likely culprit for the fake ass video: https://www.wanttoknow.info/health/funvax_fundamentalist_vaccine
M'kay. Since you're addicted to shifting the point and refusing to admit an obvious fake, we're done here. I enjoyed watching you dodge and deflect, though.
They falsely represented the research as being done by the presenter. They spliced in images from an unrelated study about a meth addict right-handed woman's brainscan. Here's the likely culprit for the fake ass video: https://www.wanttoknow.info/health/funvax_fundamentalist_vaccine
The time stamps of the images uploaded to the PPT reference studies that happened AFTER the fake 2005 overlay timestamp on the video: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-funvax-pentagon-briefing-on-removing-the-god-gene-hoax.317/
If you can't admit this is fake, there's nothing else to talk about.
The video is possibly fake. VMAT2 isn't.
VMAT2 can be found in several medical journals.
M'kay. Since you're addicted to shifting the point and refusing to admit an obvious fake, we're done here. I enjoyed watching you dodge and deflect, though.