Well, I don't know. I've been pondering this very thing. PP's research does basically depend on an axiom - essentially that with all this stuff put into place, surely something has resulted from it. All of it is (an admittedly vast amount of) documentation of things in place that COULD lead to an outcome, not actual "here we see Trump is doing this" "the military is doing that" etc.
These guys are saying they have the evidence/documentation for a contrary take on how this is actually going - things that are apparently actually happening. I suppose we will see if one or the other ends up right, or elements of both (or potentially, of course, neither).
Edit: Interestingly, it was brought up in thread here:
Does this throw a wrench in Patel’s Research ?
Well, I don't know. I've been pondering this very thing. PP's research does basically depend on an axiom - essentially that with all this stuff put into place, surely something has resulted from it. All of it is (an admittedly vast amount of) documentation of things in place that COULD lead to an outcome, not actual "here we see Trump is doing this" "the military is doing that" etc.
These guys are saying they have the evidence/documentation for a contrary take on how this is actually going - things that are apparently actually happening. I suppose we will see if one or the other ends up right, or elements of both (or potentially, of course, neither).
Edit: Interestingly, it was brought up in thread here:
https://truthsocial.com/@patelpatriot/posts/108830463668983381