See, this here is what's called a straw man argument. Nobody here is arguing that environmental inputs are irrelevant to homosexuality. But you are making the opposite argument, that homosexuality is universally due to environmental inputs. You really need to up the nuance in your thinking.
See? This right here is what happens when people refuse to rebut published research and data. Don’t take it out on me; rebut the data. Until then, I don’t care about why you think you like fucking other dudes.
See, this here is what's called a straw man argument. Nobody here is arguing that environmental inputs are irrelevant to homosexuality. But you are making the opposite argument, that homosexuality is universally due to environmental inputs. You really need to up the nuance in your thinking.
See? This right here is what happens when people refuse to rebut published research and data. Don’t take it out on me; rebut the data. Until then, I don’t care about why you think you like fucking other dudes.
I really ROFL'd at the idea of you having "thinking" let alone "nuance."
I've been voluntarily celibate for years. You should really stop assuming.
You've not provided any data either. One article published by an organization with a vested interest in the outcome isn't data. It's polemics.
“Waah I don’t like it so it doesn’t exist”.
Thank you for clarifying your position.