Bullshit. I'm doing other things. If it takes 5 seconds to do a search, the fucko asking for it can do it.
Edit: Plus, seriously, everyone here that asks for "sauce" - if they don't get it, and are incurious enough they just say "ah ok I didn't get sauce moving on" - they probably shouldn't be here. (If it was something obscure, hard to find, really wild assertion, etc, then yes, the bar would be higher for some sauce and I would expect/provide it.)
Learn to help yourself instead of this entitled bullshit. I've had this same argument several times (probably more than once with q-a) and my stance remains the same.
I agree with you on a lot of things and I disagree on a lot of things, but this is way off the mark.
If you make a claim, be prepared to provide the source for that claim. This is part of the scientific method, and it is also a part of any form of legitimate debate.
If you don't have the time to provide any sources, don't snap at them for asking. You don't even need to respond.
Often, someone else will provide the source in your stead if you're too busy or can't source it.
No, everyone always says this but, shit, if someone didn't sauce it (edit: again excepting wild things that might be hard to find or whatnot, not trivial top-of-search stuff) I wouldn't say "give me sauce" I'd look it up right away (assuming I cared) if nothing else to prove them wrong.
Take 5 seconds to search it it's all over. Come on.
This is not the proper response, if it takes 5 seconds to write that comment, you can post a link instead.
Don't be rude. If you don't want to be helpful, then don't reply.
Bullshit. I'm doing other things. If it takes 5 seconds to do a search, the fucko asking for it can do it.
Edit: Plus, seriously, everyone here that asks for "sauce" - if they don't get it, and are incurious enough they just say "ah ok I didn't get sauce moving on" - they probably shouldn't be here. (If it was something obscure, hard to find, really wild assertion, etc, then yes, the bar would be higher for some sauce and I would expect/provide it.)
Are you here to be a conduit of information or to impede flow? You said it took FIVE SECONDS to find it. That's not some doctoral thesis.
Do what you like, I'm just saying it's not helpful.
Could you find the link and post it instead?
I did, and it took 5 seconds-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOgHkdrxuT0
Search engine used was https://swisscows.com and search terms as follows -
Andrew Tate dad CIA
Learn to help yourself instead of this entitled bullshit. I've had this same argument several times (probably more than once with q-a) and my stance remains the same.
I agree with you on a lot of things and I disagree on a lot of things, but this is way off the mark.
If you make a claim, be prepared to provide the source for that claim. This is part of the scientific method, and it is also a part of any form of legitimate debate.
If you don't have the time to provide any sources, don't snap at them for asking. You don't even need to respond.
Often, someone else will provide the source in your stead if you're too busy or can't source it.
No, everyone always says this but, shit, if someone didn't sauce it (edit: again excepting wild things that might be hard to find or whatnot, not trivial top-of-search stuff) I wouldn't say "give me sauce" I'd look it up right away (assuming I cared) if nothing else to prove them wrong.
Gave it the 5 minutes.........
He's a chess master
You shut your mouth when you’re taking to me!