With all due respect, this article is Benjamin Fulford. ...How long have yall anons known about Benjamin Fulford? Because I had my short lived ride with him back in 2015.
In my experience, Fulford is well-researched in the field of Deep State/Cabal/New World Order history and current-event-chicanery... BUT Ben Fulford is also always claiming some secret insider knowledge, and he's chock-full of anonymous sources who are constantly making predictions and promises that never pan out.
To guage how accurate Benjamin Fulford's predictions are, simply scroll back to some of his older posts on his site.
As a basic example, here's a 2010 article titled "Illuminati Rule to end this year maybe even this Week"
I am by no means here to bash OP, I just already had my bad experiences hitching wagons with this particular grifter and I don't want to see my fellow anons on GAW have to go down that road and find out for themselves the hard way. Go ahead and read him for info, just ingest major grams of salt while doing so.
Now, all that being said...I too am expecting plenty of major events this summer, I just don't think we'll be able to say things like "Yeah, we took out the Deep State last June, glad that's done with"
I think we are watching an operation that is going to last years...
I think anyone who says the DS will be dismantled anytime soon is at best, ill informed. The DS was built and maintained over centuries. They have many backups, black sites, offshore accounts, etc. It will take decades to root them out. I may not live to see it, but I hope that my grandchildren will one day live in a world free of the deep states and the cabal. I will gladly lay down my life as a meme warrior to make this happen.
I don't think Q ever said it would all be finished in 8 years, I think that's just their general window of time. If it was less than 80 years, I would be surprised.
I hear you in that Rome wasn't built in a day but, you know, it did fall in a day: August 27, 410, BC. Actually it was a 3 day sack but still, things can fall quick. (If all fiat is rendered useless all those backups won't help)
IDK of course, I just know anything is always possible. Thank you for your honor. I also feel this is all for the future of humanity
Their backups aren't just in fiat currency. Lots of Spanish silver, Nazi gold, etc. They've positioned themselves so that if there is a societal collapse, while not ideal, they would still end up on top. But chaos increases risk, so they prefer the slow and steady method, which makes sense if you're able to live beyond 150 years. They think in terms of the long game and so should we.
I imagine in the future, our grandchildren will study out posts in school and trade NFTs about us, like Baseball cards or Pokemon.
It is ended already, now just replay of what happened so public can see. Otherwise what is the point of double. Unless u believe Biden is the real Biden.
I agree. We are in an operation that is ongoing. What has changed is the speed at which things are happening and the Tucker Carlson out at FOX and Don Lemmon out at CNN marks a switching of gears of the deep state. They are removing the far left/right from MSM and bringing everything to the middle. Why would they do this one might ask? I think we are entering a new stage where the left and right "agree" on TV so it appears everything is fine, meanwhile they will stage violence and attacks and blame the right. They will say Tucker (or whomever) is calling for violence and blaming the right so they can shut places like this down and even move to detain or arrest people on the right.
This is the beginning of the purge.
As for Fulford, he has good info but is no insider. He knows what we know and regurgitates it for followers.
I was JUST about to post something along the lines that you have espoused...Thank you...
NOTE: Whatever, the "White Hats" are doing, it is NOT ON ANY TIMELINE and trying to get the date is like trying to hit a moving target with a blindfold on...
Very well said. I too came to a similar conclusion some years ago. If you’ve been down enough rabbit holes digging for truth, you run into Fulford, Simon Parkes, Charlie Ward and a cast of characters best avoided. I still indulge Clif High occasionally, he was among a few others like Thomas Wictor, Rex, Tracey Bean, Brian & Duane Cates and others who shone during the Trump era. Clif was then strong on the jabs which remains for me the singular issue of our times so I stayed with him as the reveal was picking up. Alas, as speculation becomes actual reality, many of these guys have to find more speculation targets. I am enjoying the essays of Miles Mathis (/mileswmathis.com) and Miri (Miriaf.co.uk) at the moment, the former strong on genealogy and fake events, the latter on exposing the asymmetric war, jabs and the dumbness of normies. Hugo Talks and Martin Geddes have moved to Telegram. Geddes is a prolific even if mysterious writer on substack, and of course substack is in and of itself a new frontier in the essay wars.
You seem to be suggesting that we should not trust Benjamin Fulford. I very much agree with this sentiment. The problem I have with your statement however is twofold:
It suggests (implicitly) that there are others that we can trust.
It suggests that the rhetoric and the conclusions (what you are calling "predictions") are important parts of someone's research.
Research is not about "trust." Trust is the opposite of Critical Thinking. Commonly there is a problem in the general application of the word "trust" with not appreciating what it means to listen to someone v. trusting them.
If you listen to what someone has to say, you can see what facts they state, what analysis they give, and what rhetoric they use to persuade beliefs (propaganda). Everyone uses all three of those things in any investigatory report. It is essential to be able to separate these out from anyone's presentation. Every presentation (report) of an investigation has these three components that have (imo) the following hierarchy of importance (2 and 3 are both "analysis" but separated for a reason):
The evidence someone provides, and their sources (to see if they have presented their evidence in context) are the most important part of any report.
Secondary is their analysis (logic).
Next in line is their conclusion (the end of analysis). Conclusions are so far down the list because they rely on axioms. However, many of the axioms that are relied on in an argument are not explicitly stated. Rather people rely on what is "common knowledge" or "what is obvious." These injected but not stated axioms are so common in our method of reporting (in all areas, including in science), that it is essential to learn the skill of rooting out these hidden axioms in order to advance your own investigation. They are the largest flaw in any report, and where the most fuckery is hidden (intentional or not).
Last on the list of importance for any report is a persons rhetoric AKA propaganda; the words laid on top of analysis and evidence to attempt to sway the audience to a particular belief. Beyond just swaying belief, a persons rhetoric can be used to bridge the gaps of evidence and logic and is often misleading. I'm not saying it's always bad, or even intentional, but it's always there, and is the least important part of what anyone has to say.
Thus, there is nothing wrong with listening to Benjamin Fulford, or anyone else in an investigation. The caution is the same for this person as it is for anyone. Listen, separate out the statements of facts, the sources, what can be corroborated, etc., from the logical analysis, and finally from the rhetoric added on top.
This applies to every single source of information, no matter what their name is, or what side of the fence they land on, and is an essential skill for any investigation.
With all due respect, this article is Benjamin Fulford. ...How long have yall anons known about Benjamin Fulford? Because I had my short lived ride with him back in 2015.
In my experience, Fulford is well-researched in the field of Deep State/Cabal/New World Order history and current-event-chicanery... BUT Ben Fulford is also always claiming some secret insider knowledge, and he's chock-full of anonymous sources who are constantly making predictions and promises that never pan out.
To guage how accurate Benjamin Fulford's predictions are, simply scroll back to some of his older posts on his site.
As a basic example, here's a 2010 article titled "Illuminati Rule to end this year maybe even this Week"
https://benjaminfulford.net/2010/01/04/illuminati-rule-to-end-this-year-maybe-even-this-week/
I am by no means here to bash OP, I just already had my bad experiences hitching wagons with this particular grifter and I don't want to see my fellow anons on GAW have to go down that road and find out for themselves the hard way. Go ahead and read him for info, just ingest major grams of salt while doing so.
Now, all that being said...I too am expecting plenty of major events this summer, I just don't think we'll be able to say things like "Yeah, we took out the Deep State last June, glad that's done with" I think we are watching an operation that is going to last years...
When I post these links I usually refer to him as "Ben Full-of-it".
Ben Fulford complete report 17-4-23:
https://files.catbox.moe/da0cj2.pdf
In German with videos:
https://liebe-das-ganze.blogspot.com/2023/04/benjamin-fulford-wochenbericht-vom-17.html
thanks for the heads up fren
I think anyone who says the DS will be dismantled anytime soon is at best, ill informed. The DS was built and maintained over centuries. They have many backups, black sites, offshore accounts, etc. It will take decades to root them out. I may not live to see it, but I hope that my grandchildren will one day live in a world free of the deep states and the cabal. I will gladly lay down my life as a meme warrior to make this happen.
That’s why Q plan is 8 years.
I don't think Q ever said it would all be finished in 8 years, I think that's just their general window of time. If it was less than 80 years, I would be surprised.
I hear you in that Rome wasn't built in a day but, you know, it did fall in a day: August 27, 410, BC. Actually it was a 3 day sack but still, things can fall quick. (If all fiat is rendered useless all those backups won't help)
IDK of course, I just know anything is always possible. Thank you for your honor. I also feel this is all for the future of humanity
Their backups aren't just in fiat currency. Lots of Spanish silver, Nazi gold, etc. They've positioned themselves so that if there is a societal collapse, while not ideal, they would still end up on top. But chaos increases risk, so they prefer the slow and steady method, which makes sense if you're able to live beyond 150 years. They think in terms of the long game and so should we.
I imagine in the future, our grandchildren will study out posts in school and trade NFTs about us, like Baseball cards or Pokemon.
It already has lasted years.
I did a quick count and Fulford has more than 50 "ENDING SOON" style articles from the last decade.
50, so far.
It is ended already, now just replay of what happened so public can see. Otherwise what is the point of double. Unless u believe Biden is the real Biden.
I agree. We are in an operation that is ongoing. What has changed is the speed at which things are happening and the Tucker Carlson out at FOX and Don Lemmon out at CNN marks a switching of gears of the deep state. They are removing the far left/right from MSM and bringing everything to the middle. Why would they do this one might ask? I think we are entering a new stage where the left and right "agree" on TV so it appears everything is fine, meanwhile they will stage violence and attacks and blame the right. They will say Tucker (or whomever) is calling for violence and blaming the right so they can shut places like this down and even move to detain or arrest people on the right.
This is the beginning of the purge.
As for Fulford, he has good info but is no insider. He knows what we know and regurgitates it for followers.
What? How can anyone be skeptical of a guy with connections to dragon families and M15 choosing to make bitchute videos in a kimono?
I was JUST about to post something along the lines that you have espoused...Thank you...
NOTE: Whatever, the "White Hats" are doing, it is NOT ON ANY TIMELINE and trying to get the date is like trying to hit a moving target with a blindfold on...
Very well said. I too came to a similar conclusion some years ago. If you’ve been down enough rabbit holes digging for truth, you run into Fulford, Simon Parkes, Charlie Ward and a cast of characters best avoided. I still indulge Clif High occasionally, he was among a few others like Thomas Wictor, Rex, Tracey Bean, Brian & Duane Cates and others who shone during the Trump era. Clif was then strong on the jabs which remains for me the singular issue of our times so I stayed with him as the reveal was picking up. Alas, as speculation becomes actual reality, many of these guys have to find more speculation targets. I am enjoying the essays of Miles Mathis (/mileswmathis.com) and Miri (Miriaf.co.uk) at the moment, the former strong on genealogy and fake events, the latter on exposing the asymmetric war, jabs and the dumbness of normies. Hugo Talks and Martin Geddes have moved to Telegram. Geddes is a prolific even if mysterious writer on substack, and of course substack is in and of itself a new frontier in the essay wars.
You seem to be suggesting that we should not trust Benjamin Fulford. I very much agree with this sentiment. The problem I have with your statement however is twofold:
Research is not about "trust." Trust is the opposite of Critical Thinking. Commonly there is a problem in the general application of the word "trust" with not appreciating what it means to listen to someone v. trusting them.
If you listen to what someone has to say, you can see what facts they state, what analysis they give, and what rhetoric they use to persuade beliefs (propaganda). Everyone uses all three of those things in any investigatory report. It is essential to be able to separate these out from anyone's presentation. Every presentation (report) of an investigation has these three components that have (imo) the following hierarchy of importance (2 and 3 are both "analysis" but separated for a reason):
Thus, there is nothing wrong with listening to Benjamin Fulford, or anyone else in an investigation. The caution is the same for this person as it is for anyone. Listen, separate out the statements of facts, the sources, what can be corroborated, etc., from the logical analysis, and finally from the rhetoric added on top.
This applies to every single source of information, no matter what their name is, or what side of the fence they land on, and is an essential skill for any investigation.