It’s more of a strawman of a libertarian view. It’s just squid Ink because he has no good justification for denying the election interference, which can be a pretty general concept. And to your point, he’s being snarky about nationalizing twitter without acknowledging that the twitter files show their censorship boards were already infiltrated by dozens of agents from fbi, dhs, and cia.
I'm fundamentally libertarian in principle, but the thing about "actual libertarians" is they ignore OTHER principle/context. Take free trade. OK great, IF every country involved has the same rules. Borders, ok but you can't let just ANYONE in. So this guy argues it's capitalism "as intended" yet there's a vastly bigger picture that invalidates that argument (that would be a good argument absent that context/reality).
And yeah, to your to your point, he seems oblivious to the fact that what's going on here is VASTLY not capitalism, so there is also that.
Right, basically, "libertarian" is too loose so it has to have qualifiers. They let anyone from anarchists (the fastest path to statism) to borderline neocons in because "mUh LiBeRtY"
“Look handshake” kek
It’s more of a strawman of a libertarian view. It’s just squid Ink because he has no good justification for denying the election interference, which can be a pretty general concept. And to your point, he’s being snarky about nationalizing twitter without acknowledging that the twitter files show their censorship boards were already infiltrated by dozens of agents from fbi, dhs, and cia.
I'm fundamentally libertarian in principle, but the thing about "actual libertarians" is they ignore OTHER principle/context. Take free trade. OK great, IF every country involved has the same rules. Borders, ok but you can't let just ANYONE in. So this guy argues it's capitalism "as intended" yet there's a vastly bigger picture that invalidates that argument (that would be a good argument absent that context/reality).
And yeah, to your to your point, he seems oblivious to the fact that what's going on here is VASTLY not capitalism, so there is also that.
I make the distinction that I’m a libertarian nationalist who believes in borders.
Most of the pseudo-libertarian big tech excuses are out the window because the major social media platforms were created by DARPA.
Right, basically, "libertarian" is too loose so it has to have qualifiers. They let anyone from anarchists (the fastest path to statism) to borderline neocons in because "mUh LiBeRtY"