This does seem like a deflection from the blatant malpractice of using Remdesivir at all. Any plaintiff would have to prove, that the Remdesivir their loved one had was tainted with the glass, and that would seem to be very limited, and possibly not possible, which would leave all the people killed from Remdesivir, which was known to kill people, but given by the doctors anyway, without recourse.
This does seem like a deflection from the blatant malpractice of using Remdesivir at all. Any plaintiff would have to prove, that the Remdesivir their loved one had was tainted with the glass, and that would seem to be very limited, and possibly not possible, which would leave all the people killed from Remdesivir, which was known to kill people, but given by the doctors anyway, without recourse.
It seems to me that glass particles may act similarly on the organs as Remdesivir. The case smells to me.