Oh, yes, my mistake. I saw the name started with 'S' and was similar length, so assumed it was the other one from the conversation.
- It's showing a knuckle and two fingers on the hand holding the mask in the leftmost image.
- The left sleeve and back of the left hand are clearly visible at the same time as the hand holding the mask in the second image on the left.
- The left hand is moving away from the hand holding the mask.
Given those observations, you might just be able to imagine those are two different hands.
Umm... Yes, you do see both hands at that moment. Here's the proof. (Image)
At 0:34 you can see both of his hands. The mask is in his right hand, while the palmed object is still in his left as it moves toward the boy.
It certainly wasn't his mask. He was hiding something in his palm, behind the mask that was tucked under his forefinger, visible at 0:27. At 0:34, you can see him move the mask into his right hand with the mystery object still in his left palm to be given to the boy.
It looks fairly stiff and/or thick, maybe a military patch. (Which would be cool to receive clandestinely from a president.)
I've noticed this too. You'd think they'd be tripping over themselves to get the word out if there was the possibility of fraud in favor of Trump. Instead, we hear nothing or outright denial.
It's a shame the sheep don't see that. Might be a good topic to slip in a red pill.
It's the same vaccine. It was developed by Janssen, which is a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.
Two witnesses stated that the accuser talked about framing someone famous for settlement/blackmail. The judge limited how much of that was allowed to be known by the jury, if I recall correctly.
That's right. The numbers being used are based on unreliable data and shouldn't be used to draw any other conclusions.
Apparently, yes, you are. Among those ~6% with only Covid-19 on the death certificate, there may have been other factors involved in the death that weren't listed. Among the other ~94%, Covid-19 may not have actually been involved in the death. What the CDC says is the only thing that can be proven to be factually correct, and is entirely related to what is on the death certificates.
“only 6% of all coronavirus deaths were completely due to the coronavirus alone” is what The Gateway Pundit says the CDC said.
"For over 5% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate." is what the CDC actually said.
I think this is the original source. The website looks different from what I remember at the time, though.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/health_policy/covid19-comorbidity-expanded-12092020-508.pdf
Here is a different source with more data.
The "6% died FROM Covid" has always been a misuse of the stats. It was always about comorbidities and death certificates. There's no way to know with certainty, definitely not a year later, what the actual cause of death was.
It's from misunderstanding the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871. I have no idea how sovereign citizens ended up being taken even remotely seriously. Q researchers should be smarter than that.
-
Make sure "complicit" means what you think it does.
-
The average Chinese citizen has no idea about tyranny.
-
You're setting up a false dichotomy, either through dishonesty or foolishness.
-
Get off your high horse about insults after writing: "What an incredible middle finger to the people attempting to fight back against an oppressive regime you fail to comprehend."
What in the world does the hive mind have to do with being complicit in crimes? Did your brain break?
Yes, I did. Did you read it?
You clearly continue to miss the point. They aren't coerced to be like pack animals; it's how they live. The person extends to the family, the family extends to the community, the community extends to the region, and the region extends to the country. A "loss of face" to ANYTHING Chinese is a loss of face to THE Chinese; it's personal. They're one and the same to them.
(I'm completely fine with that part of their culture, by the way. It's just something of which to be aware when dealing with them. Very few will really be allies.)
Also, nobody said they're complicit in the crimes of the CCP. You're creating your own logical fallacies.
There's a lot of talk of "they're dangerous" and "they'll become violent" regarding non-leftists lately. It sounds like they're trying to get gullible people to become violent themselves as a twisted sort of self-preservation. Add in a little critical race theory and you're creating an easy path to genocide.
It seemed strange to me too when I was proofreading it. But that's really how they act; almost like the Borg.
Maybe there's a message there? It's a lot to read through, but I think I'll start looking for links between WWG1WGA and China.
Sure, pretend the hive mind defensiveness is not all over Weibo or WeChat. Pretend people on the streets aren't fussing about the latest "insult to China" they heard from state media. Pretend they're all well-intentioned and just scared to speak out. What a load of crap. As I said above, it's part of the culture. WWG1WGA is as natural as breathing to them.
Regarding China, something to note is just how strong the hive mind is there. Any criticism against anything related to China or a Chinese person is taken personally by everyone there who learns about it. They may not have been part of anything virus-related, they may even passionately hate the CCP, but they'll fight like mad to defend it. It's just part of the culture. There's several videos from Westerners in China that cover the topic if you're interested.
When it really matters, I think it's safe to say that there are virtually no Chinese allies. Although, I do agree with your point about antagonism not being good.
It's dangerous and irresponsible if you suggest they can do something that's part of their job. Mr. FBI is a stooge.
The new rules ban county clerks from allowing access to voting machines unless that person has passed a background check and is performing a task with authorization from either the county clerk or Griswold’s office. The rules also require that person to be either an employee of the county clerk’s office or Griswold’s office, an election judge or an employee of a company that provides voting machines to that county.
Gatekeeping and guaranteed conflict of interest. Perfect.
Your interpretation is that he wadded up something in the mask, which remained in his left hand to be passed to the boy, correct? What do you suppose the black object which is labeled "mask" in the images is? You can see in the images that it's slowly moving down and left, while the emerging left hand is quickly moving down and right.