1
Mr_A 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lots of double agents out there. Who's to say Ariel isn't right about his tactics, except that Flynn is flushing out paytriots as his deal to help WH? Lots of possibilities once you get into spy vs spy...

1
Mr_A 1 point ago +1 / -0

What kind of square sponge do you find at a bikini bottom? And what is Squid-ward spoken backwards, and what does his face look like? And why is there a squirrel named Sandy Cheeks?

There's plenty of strange messaging in Spongebob, regardless of gayness.

2
Mr_A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you. Much appreciated.

4
Mr_A 4 points ago +4 / -0

How is your sister now? Do you have tips or guides for successfully dealing with schizophrenia? I am going through this now with a recently-diagnosed family member.

2
Mr_A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't know. Congress specifically gave them an incredibly wide scope of operations, so there's lots of reasons not to like the CFPB in terms of government overreach, but I don't think that part was challenged in this case; just the funding mechanism which is rather unique.

3
Mr_A 3 points ago +3 / -0

No sweat.

It's a screwy arrangement for the CFPB regardless, and it deserves to be highlighted. It's a little like saying "we establish agency X and it will be funded by the bounty of the forest," meaning they've delegated the funding to a random variable. Except the Fed has infinite money, so not so random.

I think Congress routinely gives agencies separate funding mechanisms, like allowing the FDA to raise money from drug approval fees (*cough, cough ... drug approval application expenses.) On the other hand the Post Office has to beg Congress every time they raise the price of a stamp, or at least they used to.

Theoretically Congress set the boundaries of the CFPB's powers when it was established. In reality they gave them an open field with lots of latitude. Thinking about it, their purview is so large I wouldn't even be surprised if this agency started messing around with Gamestop.

4
Mr_A 4 points ago +4 / -0

Your headline is wrong. No they didn't bypass Congress nor is a precedent set up to bypass Congress.

Congress itself established it that way (and therefore they weren't bypassed), and the Supremes simply agreed that it was okay despite the unusual structure that Congress had established.

I'm no fan of the CFPB, but that's beside the point.

8
Mr_A 8 points ago +8 / -0

And dey are words dat fight Dems!

2
Mr_A 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe this is largely true, but ... how do you prove a negative, especially with all the thick chaff thrown about in the info wars?

I've seen some documentation of the fakery, especially early on in each op, but it's hard to take a firm stand without being on the ground. Got anything more solid, or just the sauce of logic?

2
Mr_A 2 points ago +2 / -0

All of these had early signs of being complete fabrications ... but proving a negative is difficult, so the vigilant have largely stayed quiet.

Not to mention that any fake mountain seems to require at least a molehill of truth for the illusion, AND a lot of extras to push the story. So I'm inclined to believe that it's all fake, but without trusted real-time cameras and witnesses, getting verifiable truth is a real issue.

3
Mr_A 3 points ago +3 / -0

Your breakdown of the division is wrong: it's not the internet generation, it's that some are awake and some are asleep. Bill Cooper ("behold a pale horse") was pre-internet, but awake big-time. Being younger means the mind, like the body, has less ingrained habits, but there are plenty of boomers and older than boomers that are glued to the Q movie, or even above it and all the other movies.

1
Mr_A 1 point ago +1 / -0

Social media has tremendous benefits, independently of the echo chambers and mental doom funnels that are out there.

Not only has Q alluded to the advent of worldwide connectivity being key to taking control from the cabal, but it also makes repairing your car and finding good recipes a lot easier! Soon we'll be doing easy accessory installs to the flying cars ...

7
Mr_A 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thanks for sharing. Good find, and good sharable quotes.

0
Mr_A 0 points ago +1 / -1

Anyone know what the final part of that clip is from? The dude who looks like Newsome but has a voice closer to Pacino?

view more: Next ›