His other point was that they didn’t care about getting lower court arguments thrown out in order to rush it to SC...which makes ZERO sense because SC considers what was presented at the ACTUAL CASE when deciding to take an appeal of a case or not.
That doesn’t make any sense....how were they going to “get through it quickly” without showing their actual evidence if they had it? Weather it be a criminal infraction or not?
His other point was that they didn’t care about getting lower court arguments thrown out in order to rush it to SC...which makes ZERO sense because SC considers what was presented at the ACTUAL CASE when deciding to take an appeal of a case or not.