There was a website a few years ago that compiled all the research on ivermectin into one place, does anyone remember?
🚨🚨🚨 I would like to request that you renounce #2 and IMMEDIATELY stop this spread of misinformation. Here are the receipts. I don't need to tote my credentials but this is medical nonsense.
I clicked and was met with the most clickbait-y site ever. The "treatment" is a 72 hour fast with supplements? WTF? It said a Doctor Recommended it? Turns out, the website is quoting Dr. Makis?? Who is this man? Clicking the link of his name leads to the worst personal website ever, with a bio of: "Canadian physician with expertise in Radiology, Oncology and Immunology. Governor General's Medal, University of Toronto Scholar. Author of 100+ peer-reviewed medical publications." 100 papers??? Wow? What's he done? I searched PubMed for his publications... they are all papers from his imaging as a radiologist. He literally does scans and writes about the images with really no broader conclusions or active involvement other than that. So this guy is overinflating nothing. Has he done papers about covid? Yes...but it is something is off, and the reason he is involved is very clear soon. Consider the following which is at the BOTTOM of the article: https://ibb.co/NS31x1k Note that all of a sudden they are selling a product to you.
Dr. Makis and the whole linked article based the "science" of this treatment, from a "paper" by a Dr. Mccullough linked here: https://www.jpands.org/vol28no3/mccullough.pdf
This is literally the stupidest thing I've ever read. It is two pages long. Is has some nice fun diagrams to look at to confuse normies but it is a big nothing burger. THIS is the second page linked here for convenience, read the discussion and conclusion: https://ibb.co/WyrcJdj
The conclusion basically says "Ha! Nothing!" And the entire paper NEVER mentions fasting at all. Why? They'd be laughed out of the medical journal.
At the very bottom of the second page, under disclosures, says Dr. Mccullough is salary compensated and owns equity in part of the company selling the "Spike Protein Support."
This is medical misinformation and chicanery designed to sell a product and every statement on that page has money behind it. Also I would like to drop the perfunctory message emphasizing the importance of proper research.
Edit: Can someone verified on Twitter message VigilantFox this?
I was listening to NPR today just because I occasionally like to listen to what obviously directed garbage they spew, and today they said something about voting ONLINE in the future.
Hey, I'm not the one that downvoted you, I just wanted to clarify because a week ago I saw the same copy paste and it weirded me out and I almost said something but didn't. So when I saw it a third time, I asked. I just had to check it out because reading the exact phrase again was just odd. I agree with your message and I understand using previous contentions in future arguments on the same topic when they are good arguments!
From their "terms and conditions" page: https://humanmeatproject.com/terms-and-conditions/
1.1 Our role
The Human Meat Project merely provides conceptual artwork. The project and website (www.humanmeatproject.com) contains pages featuring information on the art project, participants’/donators’ information, terms and conditions, consent rights and privacy rights, but the existence of these pages on the Website or Paper form does not and is not intended to be act in a real life nor deliberately/attempting to break the UN and any legal constitution law existing worldwide. Human Meat Project is a conceptual art project to give an understanding of the importance of accepting any services’ policy and agreements.
Who knows if they're hiding behind calling it art but here's what they say themselves.
Dude, three times now I've been reading posts and you're copy-pasting your same poetic everywhere. Do you do that for convenience because you don't want to type or you feel your points are good, or?
Literally stuff on this post is word for word all in your history
Think for yourself, and question.
Your last sentence should start: "With my current understanding of technology, . . . "
Today is 11/29/22 correction
Excellent data gathering and analysis