No one said it was a singular person... can one not say that someone is something without the assumption that others cannot be that thing? Bro... I am not new to this.. I am well aware Q is not one person. Are you willing to do your homework? You don't know who she is
I'm sorry that I am a handshake account ahah, I only joined this forum a month or so ago, but I am not new to Q. I have followed Q and a woman named Tore for quite a while... if you do not know Tore she is well worth looking into. You are going to put me on blast for this, but I am willing to say this with a clear conscience: Tore is Q. I promise if you dig you will realize, she hinted to her listeners today, truly an epic weekend, my friend.
Go listen. You will soon find out! https://www.radio.com/podcasts/tore-says-show-32690
everyone relax. while this may provide some additional color to what we already know about the event being staged, this isn’t some sort of damning evidence. listen to him, it’s pretty much all conjecture aside from the fact that he is an elected official. not everyone is in the know about everything... stay focused on what matters- what needs to be shown has already been collected ?ncswic
What puzzles me is why he says “QAnon”. Also, why is he saying that “most of these people are special operations types”, that doesn’t sound informed or realistic at all. What is this general’s credibility. I obviously trust Q, but I don’t trust people who claim they know who it is, pretty much no matter what. lmk if this is wrong tho...
You will not be disappointed. Heads on GAW and Q researchers (myself included) in general are a little to heavy on the distrust and light on the verify portion of “distrust but verify” which is sad. I would never have ever hazarded to say that I even have the slightest idea who any of Q is, but that has changed, and for very good reason.