1
teleomorph 1 point ago +1 / -0

Recounts also count who was voted for, not just total number. That's why recounts in Maricopa, Fulton and elsewhere confirmed vote totals for Trump and Biden. The problem was that hundreds of thousands of those counted ballots were fraudulent (phantom voters, out-of-state, etc.).

5
teleomorph 5 points ago +7 / -2

Correct.

Whoever posted, upvoted and stickied this never took a biology or chemistry class in high school.

4
teleomorph 4 points ago +4 / -0

"2020+ safeguarded."

Apparently not.

1
teleomorph 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now you are just willfully ignoring the things I said while also offering your personal interpretation of scripture (incorrect interpretation I might add).

"There is no prayer or spiritual experience outside of Him."

Loads of prayers are made to Mary and hundreds of saints. That doesn't mean they are put on higher pedestal than Jesus.

And to say there is no such things as spiritual experience (experience of spirits and spiritual nature) that doesn't include Jesus is just so patently absurd and incorrect and only shows you've probably never had a spiritual experience or connected to spiritual nature.

"The Bible gives us everything that we need for faith and godliness."

That's sad if you are limited to only the book and not the universe of spiritual understanding and knowledge that lies within and without that Jesus refers to. There was no book for the first few centuries and no single agreed upon text for the next thousand years. Are you saying every Christian for the first few centuries had no access to "faith and godliness" and truth?

Honestly your worldview sounds pretty shallow and close-minded and judgmental. Not very Godly.

Angels (the name means "messengers") can speak to us and we can speak to angels and learn from them. There's nothing wrong with that in and of itself. It doesn't remove Jesus from the throne or contradict any of the teachings.

As long as we are shrewd about which spirits, angels, and aspects of nature are benevolent, deceitful, or merely neutral, there's nothing wrong with interacting them, should the opportunity arise.

1
teleomorph 1 point ago +1 / -0

When I said "uniqueness" of Christ/Christianity I was implying the Exclusionary Principle of Christianity. That He is the narrow door to true salvation and no one and nothing else is.

I never said salvation was attainable through other means or entities. Just that one can incorporate them into the whole cosmic landscape that includes Jesus without discounting his words and the gospels.

The bible clearly elaborates other aspects of the spiritual world which one can interact with. Various hierarchies of elohim which includes numerous categories of benevolent non-human spiritual beings; form cherubim and seraphim to archangels and the Hosts of Heaven, or the Four Living Creatures who are covered in eyes.

And interfacing with these beings through prayer and altered states is also affirmed by the myriad Old and New Testament examples of prophesy and encounters made during dreams and fasting.

Nothing I said is mutually exclusive with Christ's teachings.

1
teleomorph 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's what I implied when I said "uniqueness" of Christ/Christianity.

I never said "salvation" was attainable through other means or entities. Just that one can incorporate them into the whole cosmic landscape that includes Jesus without discounting his words and the gospels.

The bible clearly elaborates other aspects of the spiritual world which one can interact with. Various hierarchies of elohim which includes numerous categories of benevolent non-human spiritual beings; form cherubim and seraphim to archangels and the Hosts of Heaven, or the Four Living Creatures who are covered in eyes.

And interfacing with these beings through prayer and altered states is also affirmed by the myriad Old and New Testament examples of prophesy and encounters made during dreams and fasting.

So you are clearly mistaken. Nothing I said is mutually exclusive with Christ's teachings.

1
teleomorph 1 point ago +1 / -0

And how is any of that "mutually exclusive according to Jesus", with anything I said?

17
teleomorph 17 points ago +17 / -0

Same. I'm Christian without formal religion.

Non-denominational Christian while also engaging with shamanism and utilizing Shaiva Hinduism.

I'm not one one those New Age "Christ Consciousness" or "Christ was just another ascended master" types. I do understand and accept the uniqueness of Christ and the teachings of the gospels, but for me, that is not mutually exclusive to a more encompassing spiritual cosmology.

1
teleomorph 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Q never identified as Q clearance Patriot. "

That is literally how Q introduced themselves in the first line of their first post.

"Q called those who asked Q questions...”anons”. Words matter."

People who post on the chans have been referred to as "anons" for 20 years now.

Get off your high horse, noob.

2
teleomorph 2 points ago +2 / -0

Relax. That's just what we originally called this anon who identified as Q Clearance Patriot. QAnon. Like FBIAnon, WhiteHouseAnon, and many other whistleblowers on 4chan before Q.

5
teleomorph 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah everybody called it 'QAnon" at first. Just like we called all previous 4chan whistleblowers: WhiteHouseAnon, FBIAnon, etc.

Q, like everybody else on the chans, is anonymous, and therefore an 'anon'.
QAnon is the label WE gave to them.

Referring to them as QAnon is normal chan-speak.

3
teleomorph 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Military has all the fraud evidence and they will show the American people,"

Yeah, just gotta wait till they're finished releasing all the ICE detainees and let China invade Taiwan. And not before we kick off some more conflicts in Syria and Iraq, and let hundreds of thousands in the energy sector get laid off.

Sorry for being sarcastic, but this idea that the military is just waiting for something if they do indeed have all the evidence AND aren't also traitorous, is getting harder to believe as this admin rapidly affects catastrophic sweeping changes in the real world.

-1
teleomorph -1 points ago +2 / -3

"Trust Wray" almost balances out all 'q proofs' as evidence that Q was a scam.

There is, and never has been, anything trustworthy about Wray. He is our direct enemy and let's us know over and over again. (and no, it's not a 'cover', he really is our enemy.)

2
teleomorph 2 points ago +2 / -0

Third option is that the plan was real, but thrown off the rails by the events at the Capitol and how media/gov were able to spin it into the worst terrorist attack in US history.

-2
teleomorph -2 points ago +2 / -4

Pompeo is currently discussing with Mnuchin invoking the 25th amendment to oust POTUS.

I'm skeptical he really is a "good guy".