Yes, this is Gates’ sophomoric spin: With better health, people in poor countries will make more rational decisions and stop having them babies in hopes a few survive. It’s utter BS. There is no mathematical calculus going on in those countries. It is instead cultural, where people in those countries like sex as much as other humans do but they do not believe in killing unborn children like Bill Gates wishes them to do.
The radical Left won't allow for peace. The protests on college campuses right now is priming the pump. Setting the pace, establishing the tone. Hollywood and celebrities will encourage protests which will become violent so they can accuse the Trump Admin of being Nazis interfering with free speech.
Ironically, its exactly what they think January 6 was, but they will take it up a thousand notches and actually commit violence, then declare that government efforts to stop them is contradicting the Right's stance on January 6 political speech.
Dude, come on. I hadn’t heard of this either and I often come here for my news. Not hard to link to a source because anons all too often get caught up in unsupported notions. Which reflects badly on all of us. Lay off the guy asking for sauce.
Everyone knows Trump wins in a fair election. The Left will not fight fair. They will need to do something to change the outcome. And they have no problem with any circumstances, whether it is destroying the country, killing millions of people, you name it.
The first season of Reacher was great. The second season made me think the franchise is done. And that was largely due to Ritchson’s poor acting.
I was going to at least give any new season a fighting chance. No more. He is dead to me like Sean Penn or Robert DeNiro or Alec Baldwin.
The elements necessary to winning a defamation case are:
1. A statement of fact was made, and it was made to someone else (Kari admits this)
2. The statement was false (Kari does not admit this, it is now the plaintiff's burden to prove that the statements were false)
3. Kari was negligent or acted with absolute malice in determining the truth of the statement (Kari denies this so again the plaintiff would need to prove this)
4. The statement caused some demonstrable damage (Kari also denies this, so again the plaintiff will have to prove it)
There is no way the plaintiff gets a directed verdict here.
They raided him for two reasons. One, to get almost half the voters to see him as a dangerous criminal. Two, to make him establish on the record that he does not have the most damaging material about the deep state. They think that will prevent him from later using that damaging material because he will be admitting that he's lied under oath and they will prosecute him fiercely for it.
Of course, when he is next inaugurated, he will be able to play all his cards and they can't then question where he got the damaging material. He'd have new access all over again, and he'd further pardon himself for having had it all that time if need be.
The US also destroyed the pipeline, which is universally known by now. That’s a huge terrorist act right there, with untold billions in economic damage.
Russia has shown remarkable restraint by not retaliating in some way. And now this. I imagine Putin will need to retaliate now. And Biden deserves the blame for whatever comes next.
After the Democratic National Convention has chosen its nominee, if Biden were to drop out, the DNC leadership gets to unilaterally decide on the successor. I promise you that’s what will happen.
The largest owner of Raytheon is Dennis Washington and he’s a conservative who is a seven figure donor to DJT’s campaign.