2
Katrina241 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amen. Drive it home like a golf ball.

3
Katrina241 3 points ago +3 / -0

Aug 14, 2022 <<< Excelsior! Animated Moving Pictures, Hollywood, CA 1976 –

"This is one of many Dough Boy commercials that I have animated from 1971 to 1985. This one was produced at Gene Warren’s stop motion effects studio where I worked for 6 years. I built the armature and body for this stop motion puppet and the replacement heads were made by Wah Chang. The first shot in the commercial of the Dough Boy and lady was an optical split screen that was done at Modern Film Effects in Hollywood."

Noticing the date here. What would induce someone who created an animation in 1976 to wait until 2022 to post a comment/clip on it? I submit as an answer 'the need for a backstory on a story going forward'.

I do think you have just uncovered our perp though. Good work.

4
Katrina241 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not the place fren, simply not the place and I'd like to ask you to remove your post of your own volition. It's better in the long run if you do it.

2
Katrina241 2 points ago +2 / -0

My interpretation of her clip here is that illegals will be able to use this claim, 'they thought/felt they were US citizens' when challenged regarding voting in US elections.

18 U.S. Code § 611 - Voting by aliens https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/611

Look here under part 3.

b)Any person who violates this section shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than one year, or both. (c)Subsection (a) does not apply to an alien if— (1)each natural parent of the alien (or, in the case of an adopted alien, each adoptive parent of the alien) is or was a citizen (whether by birth or naturalization); (2)the alien permanently resided in the United States prior to attaining the age of 16; and (3)the alien reasonably believed at the time of voting in violation of such subsection that he or she was a citizen of the United States.

This is how they are going to get away with it in November.

7
Katrina241 7 points ago +7 / -0

Many are going to say we already have this embodied in the 10th Amendment, but obviously there are problems using the 10th A. legally, or we wouldn't need an amendment. I'm not smart enough to understand why.

Tenth Amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

edited to add that I don't think that the 10 Amen. is weak or has problems. I suspect Massie wants to nail the right to grow foodstuff specifically for something he sees coming in the political pipeline. As bad as it is, it's going to get worse.

1
Katrina241 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think he's engaged adeptly in The Art of War.

Appear weak when you are strong.

2
Katrina241 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's stumbling and fumbling so badly.

When the camera was panned in on him, just before he took the stand initially, his chair was quivering wildly. I have no idea how a foot or leg movement can create such intense chair movement. It's obvious he's feeling the weight of defending the indefensible.

1
Katrina241 1 point ago +1 / -0

Put this outfit in your lineup as well.

https://freeheirloomseeds.org/

I ordered 54 seed packets and 'donated' $40, or $0.74 a packet.

They have a very large selection, all heirloom.

2
Katrina241 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes indeed. He is MAGA blessed with maleness!!

4
Katrina241 4 points ago +4 / -0

I want to updoot this but I can't because score won't let me.

Why do my G/A posts [from my bookmarked site] now show as a score sub channel? I can't seem to get back to the G/A home base.

2
Katrina241 2 points ago +2 / -0

Comment plucked from another forum. Thank you Anon,

"I bet Fani has BaD Credit.

Abandoned her home

pays cash

has others book travel for her on their credit cards.

She's probably a bad credit risk"

4
Katrina241 4 points ago +5 / -1

Lips and tongue just aren't matching up with the audible speech. Manipulated clip...but why?

-1
Katrina241 -1 points ago +5 / -6

Your take is every bit as speculative as any other.

You presuppose that's what Bolton means by the comment, but it is not 'clearly' defined as that in the comment itself.

It takes as much waffling to arrive at your conclusion as to arrive at the 'idea' he might be referencing the idea Trump is currently serving [in some capacity] in a second term.

I lean toward "military is in control" because Trump doesn't want the results of 2020-2024 as a part of his legacy.

Does the military "lean" on Trump for advice?

Absolutely!

view more: Next ›