Thank you for that answer! I had previously considered polling regarding trust in media and trust in government as possible metrics, but had trouble reconciling how 16% of Americans could have trust in the government, but 32% had trust in media. 32% trust might suggest it's a partisan thing, but that 68% distrust is awfully close to Juan's 72% awake estimate.
So why is trust in government lower? Because it is possible to distrust the government without believing they are part of a giant global Satanic cabal, whereas anyone that trusts the media pretty much by definition cannot be aware of the cabal, because the media covers for them. I think that last 8-12% is going to be a very hard nut to crack because they're largely Democratic partisans at this point..
I was able to find this from SSA and they're showing in 2020 it is about 22% of men and only 13% of women will die before 65, so more like 1 in just shy of 6.
Prior to the vaccines do you have any idea what percentage of Americans would die before age 65? Nearly 1 in 3.
If Xi coming is all it takes I think the taxpayers should give him a nice Penthouse and invite him for Sunday dinner every week.
Surely anyone who knows what happened to President Kennedy or has paid attention to recent events had already realized that. Godspeed Mr. President, may God protect you in your mission.
Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!
-Hoban Wash Washburne
Uhhhh, you skipped the massive leaps:
- We can sequence AND MODIFY HUMAN DNA now
- The microprocessor which enables AI
- Quantum computing
That is pretty good for 70 years.
The most baller move would be if he nominated himself to be his own VP. That actually fits Trump well, especially given the shit sandwich he got last time.
That way when you're in a collision and the power source gets punctured instead of burning to death in a lithium fire you get bombarded with neutrons and possibly contact the radioactive walls of the plasma vessel and you get to die an even more agonizing death! And yes, I'm mostly joking, the fusion reaction stops producing neutrons very very quickly once it is stopped (and presumably they'd have an acceleration sensor and perhaps some others to stop it in the even of a collision).
They certainly believe they won't face any consequences, and so far basically none of them really have.
Judge Merchan rules that inadmissible, gag orders you, and continues on with the sham trial.
Before doing that remove a 3 foot by 3 foot area of the floor in front of the door and then cover it up with a light mat supported by a 3 or 4 balsa wood slats. Then dig the same 3x3 hole in the basement about 20 feet feet and pour an uneven concrete floor. Congratulations, you just created the human version of a mouse trap.
I asked how you measure "normies waking up". If you can't measure that you have no way of knowing if you're actually waking them up and have no way to know when you've awoken enough. I suggested election results as a metric, since if you can't get them to change how they vote or show up to vote you either haven't really awoken them or that it doesn't matter that you have if they don't do anything.
So, instead of suggesting I don't see, perhaps you could HELP me by answering my question how we measure normie awakening.
I still don't see a metric for how we track this until perhaps election day, but I don't trust the elections are clean.
Honestly, I think the system is so corrupt at this point unless the military steps in it cannot get fixed by any external force unless it is willing and capable of unleashing massive violence. I think you'd also be surprised if I were to hazard a guess where that violence would be most effective, but obviously I am not suggesting any violence occur.
As far as 6.5 million people seeing this view I count in that number and I highly suspect most of the people that saw this had considerable knowledge already. I don't expect most of the ones that didn't already know this are going to suddenly believe because of some guy they've probably never heard is saying.
As far as reach, Joe Rogan and Tucker reach 10x that view count on certain topics.
I appreciate your question, and your challenge, and it made me think for a bit.
I'm here because most days there are at least a few posts that have meaningful information that I may not have found elsewhere.
But I'm also here because I enjoy frens, like minded individuals that share my basic values and hopes for the restoration of the Republic. And for their wisdom and the connections between events and individuals that either I don't know about or wouldn't have made on my own.
Have I been able to share much? Not as much as I would have liked, as I've only created a few topics that seemed important or of interest. I've been able to confirm a few posts from others and question far more as likely false. But mostly I exist in the domain of what I hope is healthy skepticism, but I fear that gets labeled dooming and perhaps isn't at all helpful, so maybe I should follow grandma's advice and if I don't have something nice to say (positive to ad), just don't say anything. My hope is that my 6400+ updoots means that at least some people have found my input worthwhile or helpful.
Honestly I'd answer those gotcha questions this way:
"Your own poll from xxx doesn't even list that issue as a top concern of Americans, so what possible motivation is there for you to ask about that ahead of these 15 other issues that at least 1% of Americans say are their top priorities? It's because you're biased and aren't interested in having a real debate about the issues that matter"
That would generally be people that engage with insults instead of rebutting points. I basically asserted two things:
- Did Ivan say anything of consequence that we didn't already know?
Should be easy enough for you to tell me what that is and why it makes any difference.
- Did Ivan identify any action that is going to occur to make any of this matter now, after all these years?
Nothing of consequence has happened to any of the people he mentioned, so it should be easy for you to tell me what plan there is to change that.
I'm laughing at the idea of Steve Bannon on a much more powerful transmitter feeding Biden answers.
I gave up about 14 minutes in because it was just a bunch of yapping about stuff we already know about and for which nobody involved has really faced consequences for. Maybe it ended with some plan to actually do something about it, but if anything was going to have been done about it I think they wouldn't have waited 9 years to do it.
They probably won't see it coming because the Union Postal worker didn't deliver it because you lived in a Republican zip code. BTW, that is a joke, but also serious, even though I'm fairly certain you'll vote in person for that very reason.
I don't think your vote is your most powerful weapon, because that requires an honest election and a majority of the other people that vote to agree with you. There are actions that don't require anyone to agree with that that can totally alter the trajectory of an election for instance. Unsurprisingly nearly all these other actions are crimes, so be sure to only act through legal means because you will face God's judgement for your sins.
Exactly, the House (and Senate) have zero ability to prosecute anything and there aren't enough honest and brave Patriots there to do the one thing they could do, which is withhold funding.
He's already wealthy, retired, and 83 years old, realistically what risk does this pose to him?
OK, but do you at least agree the my initial reply to you, linked below, is me mentioning I haven't seen a metric for tracking this (meaning normies that are awake)?
https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1tUlFB8/x/c/4ZBJGwLgcM6