1
UltraMagaOK 1 point ago +1 / -0

iRobert Posted May 30, 2024 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

I’m rioting now. If anyone wants to join me, just pick up a red, white, and blue, clown costume from Party City and head to D.C. Save up feces to smear around inside all the federal buildings we will be breaking into. Oh, and hang Mike Pence!

1
UltraMagaOK 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not any kind of marxist but this is terrifyingly retarded: Hagee’s book “Jerusalem Countdown,”...asserts that a U.S.-Israel war against Iran is both biblically prophesied and necessary to bring about the battle of Armageddon and the Second Coming.

3
UltraMagaOK 3 points ago +3 / -0

Iron Maiden - Revelations begins with a section of one of his poems.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aV472oGEQw

O God of earth and altar, bow down and hear our cry, our earthly rulers falter, our people drift and die; the walls of gold entomb us, the swords of scorn divide, take not thy thunder from us, but take away our pride.

1
UltraMagaOK 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you mean the actual books? I told you I know persistent trails have been seen since before jets so I think that covers it. Your point is actually that your sources don't mention that persistent trails are historically rarer than non-persistent therefore it's bullshit? That's funny.

3
UltraMagaOK 3 points ago +3 / -0

I will say what I have seen and that's about it as far as 'claims.' Do you know what the Appleman chart is? It tells you the specific conditions under which the different types of contrails will or will not be possible. Nasa said non-persistent trails were rare and persistent trails were rarer still in their study on contrails. I have not had a link to that info for a long time but they definitely stated it. All anyone would have to know is the temp and humidity relative to ice in the flight path and check it against the appleman chart to predict the outcome.

2
UltraMagaOK 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm trying to let you know I understand persistent trails have been around since before the jet age. Notice I said the old fashion kind Almost always were non-persistent. There is an old nasa study that spells it out that persistent trails are rarer than non-persistent. All I am saying is after 1998 Persistent trails became ubiquitous. They went from see em once in a great while, not every day, not every week to see them every day, all day by the dozens if not hundreds. While Non-persistent trails did not go up much by the way.

5
UltraMagaOK 5 points ago +5 / -0

I did and you said it's wrong haha. Persistent contrails and Non-Persistent contrails. The old fashioned kind almost always dissipated at a distance you could see behind the plane therefore they were Non-Persistent contrails. I asked my mom about it when I was a kid. Why are there those white marker lines that disappear going behind the jets sometimes?

4
UltraMagaOK 4 points ago +4 / -0

Okay, if you are confirming it then I guess it must be true. They don't use barium or anything other than good old cloud-seeding shit. No sarcasm: It could be just more high flying planes that fly in the 'always persistent trails' section of the Appleman chart. They could be drones for all anyone knows. Something is up with the persistent trails though. I will stand by that.

5
UltraMagaOK 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sorry, I'm not making it clear. There are both persistent and non-persistent contrails known to exist. One of them dissipates in about a minute. The other lasts indefinitely. Any guesses as to which is which?

8
UltraMagaOK 8 points ago +8 / -0

You made the claim. How do you know there are no metal aerosols in "geoengineering?"

4
UltraMagaOK 4 points ago +4 / -0

They can but persistent trails used to be rarer than non-persistent. Now they are much more common than non-persistent. I understand non-persistent to mean dissipates within 90 seconds and usually less.

4
UltraMagaOK 4 points ago +4 / -0
  • [Cloud Seeding] This is the most common thing that people claim is "chemtrails"

I don't think I have ever seen cloud seeding in Michigan but I have seen persistent trails up to the hundreds almost every day during the bush/obama years. In the 45 era they were noticeably down.

9
UltraMagaOK 9 points ago +9 / -0
  • too many people confuse geo-engineering with "chemtrails"

But "geoengineers" have proposed spraying 'aerosols' high in the atmosphere to reflect sunlight, counteracting global warming.

2
UltraMagaOK 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd say that's quite an understatement. I think there ought to be a mountain of research in a continuous chain going back to the time of O'Shaughnessy in the 19th century.

If you learn about this one thing then you learn something about virtually all the countries (the 186 parties.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_Convention_on_Narcotic_Drugs

The Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 is an international treaty that controls activities of specific narcotic drugs and lays down a system of regulations for their medical and scientific uses; it also establishes the International Narcotics Control Board. Condition: 40 ratifications Effective: 13 December 1964 (original text); 8 August 1975 (as amended in 1972) Parties: 186 (as of 2022) Signed: 30 March 1961; 8 August 1972 (amendment)

https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/commissions/CND/Mandate_Functions/Scheduling.html

The Commission on Narcotic Drugs is mandated to decide on the scope of control of substances under the three International Drug Control Conventions, namely:

the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol;
the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971; and
the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988.

States parties to these conventions are required to ensure that the respective mandatory control measures are applied to substances listed in the schedules for the 1961 Convention, the schedules of the 1971 Convention and the tables for the 1988 Convention which are annexed to these conventions. During its sessions, the Commission on Narcotic Drugs decides on proposals to add substances to, or to transfer or delete substances from the schedules/tables. The schedules/tables entail different levels of control measures.

1
UltraMagaOK 1 point ago +1 / -0

I see it confirms he was a sex offender. Are you saying read between the lines or is there more info I didn't notice?

view more: Next ›