I suspect this shit has been in tribunal since just before the 20th, probably about the last time Pelosi acted as speaker of the house without a speaker pro tempura.
You cannot try a case in both SCOTUS and tribunal, so they don't really have an option. Hence the "moot" comment last time and the lack of comment this time. They would say something if they wanted to shut us down.
Yes. I think that's an astute and reasonable (well, as reasonable as anything can be these days!) description of what's indeed likely taking place, a more specific explanation of the ongoing mechanism that I more vaguely referenced as "the plan" in my attempt below to logically determine just what the bleep is going on.
"Double Jeopardy." I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure that would qualify as being tried for the same crime twice.
So it one or the other at a time, and since SCOTUS refused the Tribunal can start, or the Tribunals had already started and that's why they couldn't take the case. Given the "moot" comment, that feels right. Lack of standing or being disqualified is very different than "moot." The word moot means either:
a) A subject is debatable
b) A subject is disputed
That's uh, not how one would describe a case being tossed out of court without a hearing. It must be debated/disputed elsewhere is my thought.
Both sides don't want it getting out. DS needs to do crisis control and save as much as they can before it all falls apart, so they are strongly motivated to make things appear normal.
Our side just wants to keep people calm. We would win if things got violent, but that's not how we want it.
If the SCOTUS is trying to piss me off, they are succeeding....
I suspect this shit has been in tribunal since just before the 20th, probably about the last time Pelosi acted as speaker of the house without a speaker pro tempura.
You cannot try a case in both SCOTUS and tribunal, so they don't really have an option. Hence the "moot" comment last time and the lack of comment this time. They would say something if they wanted to shut us down.
Although allow me give you a wee bit of grief for your (likely the fault of damn autocorrect) reference to the "speaker pro tempura ?." ?
Unless that was your subtle way of suggesting that Nancy and the Democrats are going to get fried! In which case, bravo! ?
You are right. This is improper. There's no way Nancy Pelosi is as useful as a tempura. At least with that one can get a meal.
Definitely tempura>dried out roast beef
Hahaha...thanks for the chuckle!
Thanks for the chuckle! I wish they would serve tempura, I'll take the shrimp! Hee hee! Stupid autocorrect has made me say the wildest things.
Yes. I think that's an astute and reasonable (well, as reasonable as anything can be these days!) description of what's indeed likely taking place, a more specific explanation of the ongoing mechanism that I more vaguely referenced as "the plan" in my attempt below to logically determine just what the bleep is going on.
It checks out - Piglosi looks to be both battered and deep fried...
Mmm, tempura
So good! Shrimp especially.
they would wait until it’s been exhausted civilly before anything, but now that the civil court route is done they sure can now if they wanted
I hope you are correct....
how do you know you can't try a case in both SCOTUS and tribunal?
"Double Jeopardy." I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure that would qualify as being tried for the same crime twice.
So it one or the other at a time, and since SCOTUS refused the Tribunal can start, or the Tribunals had already started and that's why they couldn't take the case. Given the "moot" comment, that feels right. Lack of standing or being disqualified is very different than "moot." The word moot means either: a) A subject is debatable b) A subject is disputed
That's uh, not how one would describe a case being tossed out of court without a hearing. It must be debated/disputed elsewhere is my thought.
Who is this attorney of Trump's?
Let’s say this is true it would have to entail so many people knowing this how is it possible no one has leaked
Both sides don't want it getting out. DS needs to do crisis control and save as much as they can before it all falls apart, so they are strongly motivated to make things appear normal.
Our side just wants to keep people calm. We would win if things got violent, but that's not how we want it.
"Military is the only way"
I gave up on the government quite a while back, somewhere around Iran Contra if I remember correctly.....
Yeah, but I only started sobering up around that time. Shall we say, "comfortably numb" ruled the day....
They already did that.
The "rioters" aimed for the wrong group of people to intimidate I guess.