-
I went in for a yearly checkup with my doctor.
-
Me: I caught covid about a month ago
-
Dr. did you get a PCR test when you had symptoms?
-
Me: No.
-
Dr. Then how would you know you had covid.
-
Me: I was around someone with covid, I then had the same symptoms of covid such as loss of smell and taste.
-
Dr.: You should get the vaccine then.
-
Me: I have natural immunity now, I no longer need the vax.
-
Dr: The vaccine is better than natural immunity.
-
Me: Explain to me, biologically - how you could claim any vaccine could produce a stronger immune system than the virus itself.
-
Dr.: ...
-
Me: Even a perfect vaccine could only produce an immune response equal to the virus with the hope that the vaccine would have less risk associated than catching the virus.
-
Dr. You should still get the vaccine because we don't know how many antibodies your body produced, if you get the vaccine your body can then produce more antibodies to protect you from covid.
-
Me: 🔥 Now that I have natural immunity, I am much less likely to get bad symptoms from covid (just like the vaccine claims to do) if I catch it again. 🔥
-
Dr.: ...
-
Me: 🔥 This means there isn't really any benefit to getting the vaccine versus just waiting to get the virus again, there is actually now an added risk of getting a side-effect from the vaccine.🔥
-
Dr.: But you might not have even had covid.
-
Me: Well then give me an antibody test for covid.
-
Dr.: Well the antibody tests aren't as accurate as the PCR tests are. Antibody tests arent determinative if you have covid, PCR tests are.
-
Me.: The PCR tests are not accurate and should not be used to diagnose covid.
-
Dr.: ... Okay we can do the antibody test.
-
Test comes back positive.
I Shut My Vax-Pushing Dr. Up!
ℹ️ ⚔️ Info Warfare ⚔️ ℹ️
This is good article is from Sept 12, I just read through it.
It goes into some detail about how, and why the vaccine is shutting down our immune system. It is the first article that actually shows the mRNA code and how it was modified to keep the vaccine from being destroyed when injected, and suggest the designers should have considered the question:
"but what would be the consequences of switching off that important early warning system?"
It also goes on the talking about the reason we are beginning to see cancers that were in remissions killing people.
Summary:
Summary
Changes to key parts of the mRNA code in SARS-CoV-2 vaccines may be causal in changing the innate immune response via toll-like receptors. Toll-like receptors are important components in defence against infection and downstream effects may also include inhibition of CD8 T cell response. CD8 is a vital part of the immune system’s ability to eradicate infection and cancer. Those changes may be reflected in recent reactivated Varicella Zoster infections although specific mechanisms are unclear at the moment. Anecdotal reports of significant uptick in cancer presenting to medical consultants may be consistent with aberrant toll-like receptor and dendritic cell changes leading to an inhibition of the anti-cancer CD8 effector response. Further data are required but the prospect of an altered CD8 response to infection and cancer is very concerning and should prompt urgent investigation.
One might be forgiven for asking: surely someone must have cautioned against doing that? And isn’t that why new drug/vaccine products are supposed to be thoroughly tested before they are given to large populations?
Thanks for this. I’ll look into it in the AM. I stoped reading covid stuff when the vaccines became a bigger issue. Much appreciated
Sure.
Mike Yeadon - I trust him first and foremost. You don't work in pharma/biotech for this long and throw away your entire career unless you've seen some things that you know are abhorrent. The way he speaks about other R&D scientists, the FDA, and companies tells me he has a lot of experience and reached the same conclusions I do.
Bret Weinstein - (believe it or not). He talks about, and does a good job dancing around, some of the oddities of COVID going back to Feb/March 2020. He initially pointed out the codon issue furin cleavage site on the spike protein. (TLDR: this is a statistical indicator it was modified in the lab). Seeing how batshit scared and hesitant he became when talking about the vax issues on his Darkhorse podcast and to Joe Rogan, he knows what's up.
Pretty much everyone at Americas Frontline Doctors: Simone Gold, Pierre Kory, Stella Immanuel. Simone Gold referenced an article published in Lancet that was used as proof that HCQ was ineffective. I looked up the articles she mentioned in both her symposium. She wasn't lying
As far as MDs, they're about 10% hit, 90% miss. If they mention using steroids or NSAIDs for treatment of COVID, you should run. Any MD should be presenting evidence like a scientist, not a school teacher. If don't understand it, look it up and train yourself to understand as much as possible. So if they talk down to you, find a new one.
Anyone remember the Anon from this board that posted about a family member/friend dying from cancer after taking the vaccine? This explains a lot
You may have inadvertently stepped into a rabbit hole here: Acknowledgments This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants AI060505, AI50484, and DE14825. Hello NIH and Bayhe-Dole Act
I don't understand much about the Bayhe-Dole Act from what I've just read.
One thing that struck me was this statement: “asserts that university research is ‘skewed’ toward marketable products and not basic research”
Yeah I’m not too familiar either but I was fixated on the author of your article and the number of patents tied to his name.. and the suspicious relationship to Moderna. Look how long ago his research was.
Look how long ago his research was.
Does research results on targets that do not change over time have a shelf life.
I have an encyclopedia set from the 1800's. I can look up information on the chemical element Iron, and the 1800's information is still valid. It's still atomic number 26 after all these years.