There is a difference between doing the science, and taking things at face value ("trusting the science") in fact, "trusting the science" is closer to biden replacement theory than not. No forensics, no real data points, just fantastical assumptions based on images - generally decades apart. Any criticism against the trendy assumption gets down voted, any real evidence which goes against the trendy assumption is ignored.
I have conducted a thorough evaluation of the claims regarding the identity of the individual in question and have found no conclusive forensic evidence to support the notion that they are not the same person as in the 1980s. On the contrary, there is compelling forensic evidence to suggest that they are indeed the same individual. Thus, unless there is verifiable forensic evidence to the contrary, any claims suggesting otherwise are purely speculative and not grounded in reality. In the realm of this particular subject, such assertions can be likened to baseless conjecture akin to beliefs held by flat earthers, lacking substantial evidence.
I don't see what's wrong with this. If you purchased strawberries and some went bad in your fridge what do you do? Throw it all out or just remove the bad ones? I remove the bad ones and eat the good ones. When the farmers pick the berries and some are bad what do you think they do?
What's wrong with this? There is no issue here. They are 10 months apart but the comments say they are 10 months old. So what exactly is the issue other than the post was regurgitated. It's not as though it's being passed ad completely new, with new comments
I see, yes makes sense, I will likely homeschool or pay for a private teacher to come to my house.